IgoPAP wrote: » Are the Law Society aware that the chances of Dublin being reduced to Level 2 by early November is very slim?
Fe1student1234 wrote: » I also got that - don’t see the harm in registering for it - I think it’s more like there’s loads of places to train and ways to do it I registered for it
rightytighty wrote: » Could someone post/PM me a link for this? Would really appreciate!
CiaraND16 wrote: » Just spoke to someone from the law school and they confirmed company contract and EU are same says as October sitting so I presume the rest are the same!
Shonagoring123 wrote: » That doesn’t make any sense if company is on Wednesday 7th and it’s moved to 7th November that’s a Saturday? And if it’s starting on the Wednesday 3rd November company isn’t the first exam so it wouldn’t be on the Wednesday? Can they not just publish a new timetable or people are gonna turn up on the wrong days
Iso_123 wrote: » Is anyone else struggling with constitutional law at the moment? I just can't seem to wrap my head around some of the topics and find it difficult to identify the issues/topics in some of the problem questions! feeling a bit defeated by it!
LS3 wrote: » does anyone have a recent griffith college constitutional manual they could swap with me for any other griffith manual they want?
CMUL wrote: » Definitely dont need the year, god is hard enough remembering the cases. If the case is very well known like a seminal case you could even get away with just the plaintiff e.g. Glencar, McGhee, Fairchild, even Hanarahan I'd say when discussing nuisance. The fact is though for the well known cases you actually know both parties but I think it saves on time. Definitely for EU just the Plaintiff's name is sufficent.
Jenosul wrote: » Hi! Constitution can be overwhelming as the questions are not to a specific topic and can be confusing. I felt this also the last time around. He is a really sound marker. I have been told and found it worked well if I just threw everything at a question in my mind as a list. Eg does separation of powers fit this question? Does Property rights? Does family? etc and say I would argue that property rights are also being infringed upon. If you say I would argue in Constitution you can argue anything! Even write out the list of topics in rough work and if it fits the question in some shape tick it off! I actually used nutshell also when studying and a few extra cases as the manual I was using was not as straightforward with explanations I found. With regards questions I would pay attention to interpretation, referendum the president and AG as these never came up in last sitting! Property rights seems to be a regular as well as sop but personally I am not indept on sop just know the functions and a couple of relevant cases. If I were to learn the full manual I would cry and be overwhelmed. I literally pick a topic and write a brain storm of what know as a way of study. I ready the questions and think could I argue property rights ect I hope this helps. Good luck. I suspect you know more than you are giving yourself credit and it will all come together for you.
Lallers96 wrote: » When you pass an exam do you automatically get your script emailed out or is there a way you can request it? I'd be curious to see what marks I got for each answer
EmmaO94 wrote: » Will be very interesting to hear Government's take on the NPHET recommendations - if they go along with them, November exams are out of the question!!
ruby1998 wrote: » I'm not able. I could have predicted this surely the Law Society could have also seen this coming.. Probably a cop out but every time something pops up that calls the exam sitting into question, my motivation to study vanishes lol.
IgoPAP wrote: » Looking forward to 25 months time when we finally get the opportunity to sit the exams because the Law Society seem to have a bizarre aversion to remote sittings.
legallyginger wrote: » Exactly the same, I also feel I could have sat more subjects now with the length of time we have and probably will have lucky to even put in 2 hours a day now
