notobtuse wrote: » Of course Chris Wallace was biased against Trump. I called that one. Wallace interrupted Trump something like 35 times. He didn’t interrupt Biden once. Also, Wallace kept pushing left-wing talking points to help Biden out and hurt Trump.
Open the Pubs wrote: » If team Trump was smarter in this campaign, he would have went hard after the Hispanic vote, he's doing quite well there but he could be doing even better with a bit more targeted campaigning. They were/are ripe for the taking, a lot of Latinos in America are conservative especially those who fled failed socialist states like Venezuela and Cuba. I did see Trump was a resounding winner on Telemundo poll on who won the debate, one of the main Spanish channels. Trump was never going to do well with the Black vote. He's tried and he has improved but there was much more scope for growth with Latino voters. Also appears Trump is doing worse with older Americans this time presumably due to Covid pandemic. I think Trump made a mistake sticking with Mike Pence. Pence does nothing for Trumps elections chances. A Nikki Haley or some Latino like Marco Rubio or someone would have been much better.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » He interrupted Trump because he was shouting over Biden when he was trying to answer the question. Should the moderator just left Trump to ramble on and on and on and on and on?
notobtuse wrote: » Come on, man... Biden did the same thing shouting over Trump, and Chris Wallace did the same thing shouting over Trump. The only one that got taken to task over it was Trump.
Deleted User wrote: » I see he mentioned Antifa, but most media are leading with the so called threat from white supremacists. Can you imagine if white groups were carrying on like BLM and Antifa have been this summer. People would be howling from the roof tops. Something very off and sinister about the topics the media are choosing to push.
1800_Ladladlad wrote: » I believe Wallace interrupts the President 75 times but biden only 15 times .......roll in the excuses.https://t.co/frvofUnHT4?amp=1
Tony EH wrote: » If you constantly try to speak over people when it isn't your turn to talk, you will get interrupted by the moderator.
breezy1985 wrote: » Polling is a science and the only kind we have that could "point us to the science that you claim supporters of Trump are ignoring because they do not believe in science"I don't know what else you want are you asking me to find a formula for a chemical compound that can read minds?
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Did you even watch it lol I get it, you're invested at this stage to the point where you cannot bring yourself to say a bad word about trump but the fact is Trump used his usual bully boy tactics to try and shout over both Biden and Wallace and he was handed his ass on a silver plate for it. Maybe in the next debate he will show a bit more decorum and respect for both his opponent and the moderators and let them speak when its their turn. I dont believe he will, I think he is too thick to allow a fair debate but hey, we live in hope.
Silentcorner wrote: » You brought science into this...if you'd said polling data you'd have saved us time. Polling data on this topic is a joke...the data that isn't interfered with for political reasons is all that matters, and I'd imagine, there isn't too much of that out there either!!!
breezy1985 wrote: » Typical it doesn't suit you so it's fake news
Silentcorner wrote: » Stop...you brought science into this, you shouldn't have, lets just let it go.
notobtuse wrote: » Sure did watch it. I know what I saw. Perhaps it's you who are too invested and unable to say a bad word about Biden. The next debate will be hosted by CSPAN. CSPAN's methods on their regular programming won't help anyone out if they follow that format for the debate. What CSPAN does is pose a question and just let the guests talk and say their piece. They don't challenge anyone on lies or inaccuracies. They let it up to the opposing side do that. If that is the case the debate will be little more that R & D talking points, not a debate.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Yes but they are not allowed to just ramble on and talk over their opponent the way Trump tries to. If he does try that again I would expect moderation to call him up on it and you'll be here the following day crying about the unfairness of it.
astrofool wrote: » So what you're saying is that small hand Trump got pwned by big boy Biden? And Biden got away with it! Poor little Donald.
notobtuse wrote: » Hmmm... Only Trump, eh? They both rambled, and Biden stumbled some but didn't across as a total bumbling fool, so his campaign could consider that a win, I guess. Face it Trump got in more clearer statements during the debate, and Biden came across as a shifty politician with mere talking points and no substance. And that might be good to challenge BOTH candidates on some matters, but that's not the way CSPAN rolls.
notobtuse wrote: » Not at all. Trump won the debate with clearer and more precise statements, despite the fact that the deck was stacked against him.
Tell me how wrote: » 200,000 dead from a pandemic he got 3 months notice on. Highest unemployment rate in nearly 100 years. Played for a fool by Kim Jong-Un.Backward steps in environmental issues. Played for a fool by Putin. Stoked the fire of racial division. Played for a fool by Saudi Arabia. WTF would a bad record be?
Trump signs $3B-a-year plan to boost conservation, parks President Donald Trump signed legislation Tuesday that will devote nearly $3 billion a year to conservation projects, outdoor recreation and maintenance of national parks and other public lands following its overwhelming approval by both parties in Congress. Supporters say the Great American Outdoors Act is the most significant conservation legislation enacted in nearly half a century.
Foxtrol wrote: » The deck being the rules that Trump's own campaign agreed to and he tried to ignore last night?
astrofool wrote: » Yes, clearly Fox News thinks he's a loser as well now, and he needs a proud moderator for his next debate so that Biden doesn't bully him as much, poor little Donny!
