Mellor wrote: » It was a boxing match, so not a cross-discipline match for Floyd. Surely you knew that. :eek: So you are saying he was more concerned with Conor’s power than De La Hoya, Marquez, Mosley, Cotto, Maidana, Canelo Alvarez, or Manny Pacquiao. If you say so, but that’s considerably more damning than what I was suggesting.
US2 wrote: » Conor land more shots on Mayweather than nearly every one else Mayweather has faced. Nobody takes punches to the face on purpose.
bmcc10 wrote: » Why not fight Dustin in Ufc and donate the purses to charity?
weldoninhio wrote: » How many other cross discipline fights did he have? He was defensive in the first two rounds so he could gauge McGregors “power” once he realised that McGregor was throwing pillow hands at him he opened up and danced around for a while before finishing it.
LollipopJimmy wrote: » I have been saying for ages now I'd love yo see him fight Dustin. No way Dana let's that happen and he'll never let them fight now just as a massive FU Sake.
froog wrote: » ah come on, you don't think mayweather dragged it out to put on a show??
robwen wrote: » https://twitter.com/Maclifeofficial/status/1310763562223251456?s=19
Mellor wrote: » No I don't. Because it's not some thing he has ever done. He serves him no benefit. If anything he's bets were a bigger factor than putting on a show. Nothing about the early rounds look like somebody putting on a show. He shelled up, and was heavy on defense. That's being cagey and smart, not an exhibitionist. Conor had a small window to win. Floyd was letting that window close. That in itself was an achievement that surprised many reasonable posters.
Ush1 wrote: » He has said in interviews since he made it last to put on a show. Might be posturing, but he's arguably the greatest boxer ever so if anyone can mess around in there...
froog wrote: » the mayweather fight was massive because a good lot of people actually believed mcgregor had a chance.
walshb wrote: » Mayweather still made a fooking meal out of beating him. He actually lost several rounds as well, and only started getting on top when McGregor got tired... For me, Mayweather was the loser here. Taking ten rds to finally stop a complete novice, and looking clumsy and awkward and unsure for large parts of it.. And the fight showed clearly that Conor belongs nowhere near a boxing ring against any decent boxer..
simongurnick wrote: » Dont kid yourself. The fight will be massive.
xtal191 wrote: » Would he even be able promote his Whisky in Saudi Arabia if the fight was there?
rob316 wrote: » It wont be the money maker hes expecting, there will be no circus promo's with Manny, Manny won't be interested in making it look good like mayweather.
walshb wrote: » We know he was the winner officially.. He still looked dreadful in the fight.. Looked even worse in his next outing against the Japanese lad..
Ush1 wrote: » I can assure you, Mayweather was the winner in every conceivable way. He has said in interviews since he made it last to put on a show. Might be posturing, but he's arguably the greatest boxer ever so if anyone can mess around in there...
walshb wrote: » Mayweather still made a fooking meal out of beating him. He actually lost several rounds as well, and only started getting on top when McGregor got tired... For me, Mayweather was the loser here. Taking ten rds to finally stop a complete novice, and looking clumsy and awkward and unsure for large parts of it..