ThewhiteJesus wrote: » So why is no one else printing them, you are wrong, just as they were for doing it. Why pour petrol on a burning fire
Mr. Karate wrote: » Someday the Europeans will regret the day they fell for the "You don't need a gun. We're the Govt. We'll protect you." lie.
suicide_circus wrote: » People are not printing them out of fear brought on by the craven crawling attitudes of people like yourself. The "burning fire" here is the bronze age fanaticism of a fascistic death cult which has no place in the modern world and definitely no place in Europe. These people need our spit in their eyes not out appeasement.
ThewhiteJesus wrote: » Idiotic post, no conflict would ever be resolved with spitting in the oppositions Eye. Negotiations are the only way, look at the north in our country.
Patrick2010 wrote: » Someday Americans will regret all the mass school shootings due to their belief that citizens needed easy access to guns to protect themselves from their government
Mr. Karate wrote: » maybe if the Western Governments weren't hell bent on importing violent people into our Countries then we need easy access to guns.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » When was the last time you felt the need to be armed in Ireland due to "imported violent people"?
mcmoustache wrote: » Back when the Hebdo massacre happened, publications around the world could have helped out by printing the pictures. If you had all major Western media publishing them, it would have made it more difficult to see this as just a Charlie Hebdo thing and moved the target off them somewhat. I understand their fears for their journalists but I think capitulating like that sent the wrong message. That and those cnuts could hardly go after everyone.
Bowie wrote: » Why insult people just to stick it to a minority or murderers? Treat it like the 'N' word. Track down the killers.
Lylah Late Minibus wrote: » Once strolled into an Islamic 'Art Gallery' when travelling in a major int'l city, to pass an hour or two. After 10mins walking inside, disappointed and deflated, realised would have experienced more asthetic visual and sensory pleasure shopping at at DIY depot for monotone navy patterned tiles. On the way out the curator chap at the exit asked 'Did you enjoy the art?'. Had to look at him, look at the gallery signage above the door ('art galllery') and then back at the wall hangings (to make sure there wasn't a trip in the matrix). The least offensive thing could do was to say nothing, shrug the shoulders, and exit with some gusto. Perhaps they can start with simple cartoons, then work up towards Antoni Gaudí or Picasso after a millenia or so.
riffmongous wrote: » I'm calling bull**** on this, there is some amazing Islamic art out there, even any basic carpet will have a detailed design on it. It's just a different style, mostly geometric or calligraphy
TheBlackPill wrote: » The majority tacitly support the islamists. Check out Pew polling and you find majorities support their medieval BS
riffmongous wrote: » I'm calling bull**** on this, there is some amazing Islamic art out there, even any basic carpet will have a detailed design on it. It's just a different style, *mostly geometric or calligraphy*
TheBlackPill wrote: » You'll find a lot of the good art and science comes from the Persia/Shia side of islam, who make up only 10% of the islamic world. The sunni side of islam is a cultural desert.
Mr. Karate wrote: » Every Muslim supports Sharia being implemented in the West. So virtually they all support the terrorists to some degree.
Lylah Late Minibus wrote: » Can't remember the city, one of those places that's not Europe, but still feature in the Eurovision sing-off.
mcmoustache wrote: » Azerbaijan, most likely.
mcmoustache wrote: » Nonsense. Their beliefs range from liberal secular to full-on head-chopper. It varies massively by country.
Deleted User wrote: » I've read some speculative garbage on boards, but this takes the expired cake. I know three people of the muslim faith, all of whom detest ISIS and other terrorist splinter groups. An antagonistic minority is in no way representative of the majority. You "virtually" made up these assertions on the spot.
Lylah Late Minibus wrote: » I'm calling your view as bull**** and indeed unfounded, unreasonable. The gallery 'is/was' as you describe, ALL geometric-calligraphy. This is not high (or even reasonable) art, this is pattern making and squiggles at best, I'm very sorry to say as the experience was 15mins I can't get back.
Mr. Karate wrote: » Every Muslim living in the West has always answered Yes when they're asked if they want Sharia implemented in the West.
Godeatsboogers wrote: » Were you there every time a Muslim was asked? Otherwise that's a seriously ostentatious remark. Replies like this are actually hilarious, just a wild generalization casually implied as fact when the information required to find it as fact is unbelievably out of the scope of anyone's abilities, unless your omniscient? Are you omniscient? Why do you only use your power for things like finding out what every muslim has said when asked a question about sharia law?