ThewhiteJesus wrote: » Say that to families who had loved ones slaughtered like pigs because of those pictures.
Junkyard Tom wrote: » The corporate media? The media owned by billionaires? The media whose journalists prostitute themselves to corporate power? The corporate, billionaire owned, hack media, is 'left wing'?
RandomName2 wrote: » Well the media tends to be more left wing than right, I think that's a given. But there's no cover up of this story at all. It's not a massive story (nobody is dead.. yet at any rate), but it's well reported. The fact that it is Islamic terrorism is not in dispute either. Ya what? Some people just want to watch the world burn, and making excuses for them is doing the devil's work. The Charlie Hebdo massacre was only one of dozens ISIL inspired attacks in France. I suppose the Bataclan theater should not have shown public support for Israel. The Hypercacher kosher supermarket should not have been allowed to have provocative Jewish products. The Toulouse and Montauban shootings was in retaliation for the provocative ban on wearing religious clothing, and also because of the presence of Jews in France. The Nice attack was generally due to the provocative French bombing of ISIL targets. The perpetrator of the Paris bomb plot (who eventually went on to behead a priest in a church in Normandy) was motivated by.. the provocative presence of French people.
Pkiernan wrote: » Who'd have thoughts that the suspects would have been 18 year old immigrants from Pakistan? Everyday normal people paying the price for left wing guilt complexes.
GT89 wrote: » Mainstream media not reporting on this much there's a surprise
Mr. Karate wrote: » Someday the Europeans will regret the day they fell for the "You don't need a gun. We're the Govt. We'll protect you." lie.
bobbyy gee wrote: » I wonder were the smart to print the same cartoons again
ThewhiteJesus wrote: » I disagree, Charlie hebdo should never have printed those incendiary pictures
RandomName2 wrote: » Well the media tends to be more left wing than right, I think that's a given..
Deleted User wrote: » The ould meat cleavers of peace again. It's a price worth paying for kebabs am I right?!
Junkyard Tom wrote: » I suppose if your social media feed is populated by reactionary headbangers who jump on every incident to fill your brain with 'the world is ending' hysterics then it would appear that the mainstream news-media is involved in some 'leftist' conspiracy, or some mad shit like that.
Man with broke phone wrote: » He has, but from the Talibans point of view it looks like a violent coup with the democrats stealing power.
Man with broke phone wrote: » If you signed a phone contract with 3 after having an issue with virgin media and virgin media seized all their offices and shops a few weeks later chanting defund the police would you be happy?
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » And for stupidest post of the thread the winner is...... :pac:
[Deleted User] wrote: » Obviously the mainstream media are in collusion with muslim extremists to impose sharia law on us unsuspecting westerners. Better look to the ports, you never know what's stirring inside the cargo bay. You take Dun Laoghaire tonight just in case, I'll keep a watchful eye on Rosslare.
Man with broke phone wrote: » He has, but from the Talibans point of view it looks like a violent coup with the democrats stealing power. A few splinter groups will get out of hand but in the grand scheme of things they will hold tight and see if democracy can happen. If you signed a phone contract with 3 after having an issue with virgin media and virgin media seized all their offices and shops a few weeks later chanting defund the police would you be happy?
artanevilla wrote: » The Taliban don't operate in the middle east.
mcmoustache wrote: » Back when the Hebdo massacre happened, publications around the world could have helped out by printing the pictures. If you had all major Western media publishing them, it would have made it more difficult to see this as just a Charlie Hebdo thing and moved the target off them somewhat. I understand their fears for their journalists but I think capitulating like that sent the wrong message. That and those cnuts could hardly go after everyone.
namloc1980 wrote: » Hang on a second. Didn't Trump proclaim he had a peace deal with the Taliban? Yes he did. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AOLEAm1Si0 Not much of a deal if you are suggesting it's falling apart already. So much for the master dealmaker and his "art of the deal".
Man with broke phone wrote: » Brace yourself from being scared out in crowded events or on the bus to work for a while.