Deleted User wrote: » Harris was always supposed to be the nominee apparently until Tulsi ended her in the debate..Biden was the only one who could take out Sanders..I have a really bad feeling about him and the debates..
Silentcorner wrote: » How do you mean, I'd imagine they'll put everything into ensuring he is ok...
Deleted User wrote: » Yeah, you'd imagine so, but I still reckon he could just blank or short circuit or something and we're all just left looking at someone too old for it..
Deleted User wrote: » Are you pushing the performance enhancing drugs angle? You guys really need to actually consider the nonsense you're spouting.
Silentcorner wrote: » He is a 78 year old man, who is a few weeks into a grueling campaign...I haven't suggested anything of the sort, but if you don't think that his handlers won't be adjusting his schedule, diet and rest in the run up then you really are naive. And so what if they are giving him some chemical to boost him, if someone told me Trump was on something I wouldn't get my knickers in a twist...it's certainly explain how he manages to cover so much ground rallying MASSIVE crowds all over the States seemingly every day all day long...I don't know how he does it!!!!!
namloc1980 wrote: » Trump is 74. This notion that Biden is old and decrepit at nearly 78 but Trump is grand at 74 is just bizarre.
Silentcorner wrote: » You see no difference in energy levels between the two? I mean...it is not really a bizarre to question whether a 78 year old man has the energy to run for the highest office in the world now is it? It isn't bizarre to question whether a 74 year old man has the energy either... Why do ye get so prickly about these obvious things?
namloc1980 wrote: » I'm not at all. You're the one who suggested Biden might not make it through the debate based on what I don't know. We just saw him stand for his entire townhall last week while Trump was very low energy and sat for all of his. Did you watch Trump's extremely low energy speech at the RNC? In more formal structured settings Trump is very low energy. Surely you can see that. Trump's campaign (which you seem enthralled by) is the same each night. He flies in, gets off the plane, gets on stage about 100m from the plane, rambles on about the exact same things to a crowd who cheer no matter what, gets back on the plane and off he goes. Rinse and repeat every night. He seems to feed off the adulation of the MAGA crowds at his rallies and can basically talk about whatever he wants unchallenged. There'll be no crowds at the debates and he will face challenge - I reckon he'll flop badly. Not discounting ridiculous Biden gaffes either.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Harris was always supposed to be the nominee apparently until Tulsi ended her in the debate..Biden was the only one who could take out Sanders.. I have a really bad feeling about him and the debates..
Mic 1972 wrote: » Biden has brain issues, it's a fact There is no hypocrisy and i honestly feel sorry for him but that's the reality
Silentcorner wrote: » You see no difference in energy levels between the two?
DangerScouse wrote: » Trump has tons of energy. He's constantly doing interviews, rallies and events. Biden is hiding in his house and when he's allowed talk by his handlers is looking confused, weak and massively lacking in energy. He was a terrible pick to run for president from the dems.
dwayneshintzy wrote: » Differences in energy;
Outlaw Pete wrote: » If you listened to them you would know they were not merely "potential polluters". No, and this is the problem when you have overreaching legislation as it enables environmentalists and climate change activists to easily dismiss genuine issues. You act as if he repealed the act on his own. He responded to complaints and from what I can see they were genuine. The current administration are concerned about that which deserves to be concerned about also. You saying that what happened has meant industry can pollute with impunity is simply not true as they rolled regulations back, they did not just repeal it and leave nothing in place. New measures are coming too and I'm sure they will alleviate the more genuine of concerns. Like I said, it's rolled back and far from the free for all you're implying there now is.
Cody montana wrote: » And yet Biden is still seen as the favourite. The second part of your post was nonsense btw.
Deleted User wrote: » It's hilarious how they keep posting the 'Biden riding a bike' clip..
DangerScouse wrote: » They really are hopeless. He's riding a bike not climbing Everest. Ah sure leave them to it i say. Trump has the energy that will win him 4 more years and the meltdown come the 4th will be one for the ages. Even better than 2016 in my view
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Care to post a video of Trump doing anything slightly energetic over the last four years? His golfing doesn't count as he is too lazy to walk and uses a buggy. The man sat for his whole town hall, can't even stand for an hour at his rallies without desperately clinging to the podium.
ExMachina1000 wrote: » The difference in the campaigning shows enough. Trump is in a different state every single day. The hard slog. Clocking up the mileage ,visiting businesses and meeting the people. Every single day. Biden on the other hand is at home relying on the media and Michael Bloomberg to promote/buy the election for him. Chalk and cheese.
ExMachina1000 wrote: » The difference in the campaigning shows enough. Trump is in a different state every single day. The hard slog. Clocking up the mileage ,visiting businesses and meeting the people. Every single day.Biden on the other hand is at home relying on the media and Michael Bloomberg to promote/buy the election for him. Chalk and cheese.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w4.vanillicon.com/v2/43d5d8eb6f74f970975eb821385072d4.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/dbba4c22aa1d352d2cdbb076e36aea8c.svg)
