StackSteevens wrote: » Listening to Slimeball Snoddy on Morning Ireland and he's so wrapped up in IRA propaganda that he referred to AGS as the "Irish Constabulary". What a jerk! When he dies, Ireland will be a far better place.
FrancieBrady wrote: » You are typical of the partitionist 'mind' Truth...every single one of the noted partitionists on here had to have comment on the Unquiet Graves programme dragged out of them and it is of the expected simpering apologetic 'der was a few bad apples' variety.
Truthvader wrote: » More drivel. Not supporting(...............)ating their dead in Enniskillen
Odhinn wrote: » The armed struggle was regretably necessary and no amount of hand wringing is going to change that.
Truthvader wrote: » More drivel. Not supporting or rewarding murder and thuggery is unrelated to partition. No-one has to say anything about Unquiet Graves because Boards is not infiltrated by Loyalist criminal supporters glorifying and justifying the murders. Your continual support and justification of the Sinn Fein IRA murder campaign as a "war or conflict" or that the IRA were ever "protecting" Catholics needs to be called out every time. When Catholics actually needed protection in the late 60's it was IRA - I ran away while Catholics did not need protection from 12 year olds in Warrington or people commemorating their dead in Enniskillen
Truthvader wrote: » Nope, it simply wasn't. It was a tidal wave of evil benefitting only Gerry Adams and a couple of chosen associates. For everyone else (including the families of the unfortunates persuaded to starve themselves to death) it brought only suffering
FrancieBrady wrote: » I never supported any murder campaign, war or conflict. Your sanctimonious rubbish will not make that so. Your partitionist selective moral high grounding is disgusting here. 120 died in one small geographical area and you are silent on it. Not because it isn't relevant but because you have no moral courage. It was that lack of moral courage that contributed massively to what happened on this island. As you said, the violence and oppression being inflicted on our people forced the IRA into re establishing them selves because the Irish government, constitutionally mandated to protect their own citizens stood idly by and created the vacuum that the IRA or some other defensive group was always going to fill. Your inability to acknowledge that there is not just ONE side to blame is telling.
Truthvader wrote: » Could go on forever responding to this Sinn Fein IRA cocktail of lies half truths equivocations and justifications. The laughable reference to the IRA as a "defensive group" takes some neck though. What "protection" did anyone need from Tim Parry or the thousands of others going about their daily lives who your heroes decided to murder - often chosen randomly.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Ffs ..more rubbish. Why did 120 have to die as Britain tried to start a bloody civil war? It was always going to go out of control when the two governments responsible criminally abdicated that responsibility. And one of them became am active player in the war/conflict or whatever your bias wishes to call it.
blanch152 wrote: » There isn't a single poster on these boards defending anything that a loyalist terrorist did. There is no need to challenge them. As for moral courage, you equivocate and waffle and dodge the issue of supporting violence because you don't have the moral courage to admit that you support the killing of young children in Warrington, Mullaghmore and elsewhere, that you support the murder of Garda McCabe, that you are indifferent to the suffering of women caused by Sinn Fein and the IRA, that you celebrated the release of his killers, and that you got a good laugh from the Kingsmill bread councillor. Be honest, be upfront and say it like you feel.
Truthvader wrote: » So Britain "tried to start a bloody civil war" now. And we pass on into hyperspace leaving reality far far behind forever.
Truthvader wrote: » Yep. always a bit bewildering when he is on the radio trying to form a coherent sentence. Seemed to be complaining that the Guards failed to show up to shut down a party in Oliver Bond. Maybe they were afraid someone's wife would throw a bottle at them
StackSteevens wrote: » Clearly it remains a core element of SF/IRA doctrine that individuals are never responsible for any actions that they may take and it's always someone else's fault.
FrancieBrady wrote: » You are as complicit in the demeaning and vilification and lies about one community as the British or Unionist ever where. The above is just a stream of lies blanch and you cannot back it up for an iinstance. BTW 'Silence' is just as much an aid to the forces of darkness than support ever was. Why else would you collude with one side and carry out 'at the time' secret attacks? Go on let the forces of the truth at that question unle4ss you wish to be a TruthEvader.
StackSteevens wrote: » Poor auld Snoddy was kept well away from the RTE cameras for the lunchtime news and it was left to the privately educated, articulate, reasonable Harry Potter Eoin O'Broin to make Sinn Fein's case that, as usual, it was all the fault of An Garda Siochana. Clearly it remains a core element of SF/IRA doctrine that individuals are never responsible for any actions that they may take and it's always someone else's fault.
maccored wrote: » christ sake - more high horse bull****
mynamejeff wrote: » its high horse bs to disagree with the terrorist murder of innocents now ?
Truthvader wrote: » Well Francie I did a bit of reading about Unquiet graves and what did I find? Sean Murray the maker of the film was a regular contributor to An Phoblacht back in the day. So hardly ever going to be a reliable source of anything. The narrator Stephen Rea is of course the man who looked at the wretched IRA bomber and killer of Jean McConville, Dolours Price and found love. Who do you expect will take the slightest notice of these sources? I also read a bit more and caught up with the Barron and Cassel reports and you will be delighted to hear that I am suitably outraged that these people, particularly the RUC and UDR (who were supposed to be protecting the public) were let loose on the public and more particularly why both the Irish and British governments have not pursued this relentlessly and chased it down to uncover how high up the criminal murder campaign went AND to imprison those involved. I suppose the reality is that firstly Sean Murrays work is from such a poisoned source that no-one wants to be seen to respond or act on it. That does not explain why no action has been taken before - unless of course the GFA which you continually refer to resulted in a free pass for loyalist criminals as well as your own heroes. If I had my way every one of the Glennane murder mob would be in jail long term - along with Gerry Adams & Co Two other thigs occur 1. If the IRA were actually protecting Catholics as you pretend how did they sit idly by while 120 were killed. Even I would support an armed struggle on that issue. 2. Not one IRA murder, punishment beating or bombing helped a single one of the 120 people murdered by the Glenanne gang. It simply heaped the same misery and injustice on a different 120 people and achieved nothing only suffering. Just because you have suffered injustice it does not entitle you to murder and mutilate other random people
maccored wrote: » its high horse bull**** to pontificate on high about something you've never had to experience first hand
maccored wrote: » it doesnt matter who made the film - what matters is what the people in it admitted to. You sir, have a blatant bias.
FrancieBrady wrote: » The previous police force (RUC) made a good job of undermining itself Mark, did you miss Unquiet Graves and all the other stuff they were involved in. It would be extremely prudent to keep them under constant review, we wouldn't want to stand accused of again ignoring what is going on. Same question for you as blanch, have you ever seen them do this in another investigation. What's the benefit of releasing this information and is it normal policing?
