Bubbaclaus wrote: » It's about ensuring the country still has a minimal amount of function in all the key areas. Also remaining open at level 5 would be hospitals, grocery stores, garda stations, post offices, nursing homes, public transport, GPs, pharmacy, fire stations etc etc. So it is about ensuring that the vital resources in the country continue to function at all times.
ulsen wrote: » As I understand it, the Union has tried to talk with the department, the department has ignored them. Teachers aren't going out on strike straight away, this is to ballot teachers so that the option of going on strike is there if the department of education continue to ignore the unions legitimate concerns.
Bubbaclaus wrote: » I assume there are restrictions on visitors to schools also? I would be astounded if not. Hospitals tend to be quite crowded in certain departments. Particularly in ED. Aren't 30% of COVID cases medical staff?
is_that_so wrote: » Well they'll look a whole lot worse if they ballot for it especially when the rest of the country is working hard together. There's always time for talking. A quote from a man who never gave up! When people are divided, the only solution is agreement - John Hume
rainbowtrout wrote: » Oh there's restrictions on visitors, but are there 500+ people coming and going every day in a nursing home like there is in a school? I doubt it. I couldn't comment on A&E numbers, but anecdotally the numbers visiting A&E plummeted during lockdown. Not sure why you are determined to imply that schools are not a problem.
ulsen wrote: » Optics, and how things look to the rest of the country, doesn't and shouldn't be the concern of the union, especially when it comes to the health, wellbeing and working conditions of it's representatives- teachers. Nicely intended quotes won't get the department of education to talk- unfortunately it takes the threat of strikes or legal action to make the department listen.
Bubbaclaus wrote: » If a secondary school is wedged with 800 pupils and it is being proposed to strike over that, fair enough that there are concerns, but what is the solution?
mirrorwall14 wrote: » And to add, the lack of transparency is horrifying. How many cases were there in the Celbridge outbreak? How many teachers? How many students? What were the systems in place? None of that is published. It’s barely been covered. Compare that to the meat factory wall to wall coverage, add in the drogheda school all being told the app was wrong and it practically feels like a cover up just to make sure we stay at work regardlezz
Mardy Bum wrote: » It is great to see the union actually do its job. Ireland is becoming a corporate state in the same vein as the US so whenever any union puts its a head above the parapet it will be blasted by the full force of the neoliberal regime. Members should hold their heads high. Irish students are among the most literate on the planet and we are producing well rounded individuals who find success across the world. Other sectors in our economy are failing through poor management and leadership (HSE cough).
rainbowtrout wrote: » We don't know that yet. We are only back a three weeks. If a student gets covid, by the time they show symptoms, are tested, and isolate, it will probably be another week before other students show symptoms. Also what has to be taken into account (and isn't) is that many of these students are mixing at lunchtime without masks on, and outside school. Three weeks back is too soon to have any definitive statistics on schools.
Bubbaclaus wrote: » Where am I implying that? Seems you are putting words into my posts that arent there. I haven't seen much in the way of practical solutions being proposed in this thread, which is why I was asking about what proposals people have in the first place. If a secondary school is wedged with 800 pupils and it is being proposed to strike over that, fair enough that there are concerns, but what is the solution?
The_Dazzler wrote: » Been doing that since March in hospital. At least teachers got as few months off. worked from home
Bubbaclaus wrote: » Where am I implying that? Seems you are putting words into my posts that arent there. I haven't seen much in the way of practical solutions being proposed in this thread, which is why I was asking about what proposals people have in the first place.
beauf wrote: » Kids have been mixing since march? Lots of sorts clubs back a decent amount of time. They should know the stats from kids presenting in with symptoms a very long time now. They wouldn't have been stopped back if kids mixing was a significant risk . We've already had cases in schools, tested and returned.
Padre_Pio wrote: » Fortunately, a teacher's job is to teach, not come up with national disease prevention strategies. That's the job of NPHET and the HSE, who have been woefully silent on the matter.
beauf wrote: » Kids have been mixing since march? Lots of sorts clubs back a decent amount of time. They should know the stats from kids presenting in with symptoms a very long time now. They wouldn't have been stopped back if kids mixing was a significant risk .
Bubbaclaus wrote: » I see. So the proposed strike is coming with no solutions? That seems odd to me. Although "that's not my job" does seem to be prevalent in the public sector across the board in Ireland, so not overly surprised to see the phrase popping up here.
Bubbaclaus wrote: » Careful you don't fall off that pedestal. Don't think it is appropriate to be bashing other parts of the public sector on this thread, particularly one that has been front and centre working through the pandemic and putting the wellbeing of others ahead of their own.
amacca wrote: » I hope you are correct I cant logically see how you could be mind you....id have thought they would be a huge risk for causing spread They are more likely to be asymptomatic carriers correct? Then when they go back to their homes with the best will in the world + hygiene one would have to imagine the virus will spread to siblings/parents.....then they bring it with them to other locations etc
beauf wrote: » Have that done that since March? Kids and teens have been hanging around each other all summer. Has it caused a spread. If not why not. We've really only seen an increase since adults increased contact with each. I'm not saying it hasn't happened with younger kids. But its not reflected in the stats. (that we are are aware of).