Bobtheman wrote: » So according to reports we are to be balloted. Have tunned out of Asti events last few years because of the members cowardice. And a lack of leadership from headquarters/SC. I was surprised to hear about a ballot. To me it came out of the blue. I do believe the issues are important. I will vote yes to strike action. I see a ballot being carried 60-40.
acequion wrote: » Y 1.With the highest pupil teacher ratio in Europe, classrooms, even with the supposed metre between desks, are still overcrowded. Corridors, stairwells, yards are still overcrowded despite the very best efforts of everybody and kudos to the kids for their overall maturity. But crowds are crowds. And in every other indoor workplace or public place crowding has been managed for the safety of everybody. Why should those in schools, both pupils and staff, be treated differently?
s1ippy wrote: » I don't anticipate this thread will be used primarily for discussion on the ballot, based on the state of the other threads about teachers, because of the cohort of people who hate them. I reckon this will pass by a large margin. I have only seen a smattering of teachers describing being satisfied with this situation, and even then, a number of those were likely to be the same crowd who come on here to shout abuse at them, impersonating them. Fairly pathetic but that's what you're dealing with. This action is a huge statement. Teachers are obviously educated people, they are looking at the situation and seeing that their environment is completely unsafe. If ever there was a time to stand up and use their unions, it's now. The action taken as a result will undoubtedly reduce transmission and the outcome will be favourable for everyone and the health service to boot. The fact that the current system in place has been allowed is staggering and suggestions to the contrary demonstrate a lack of understanding or wilful ignorance.
Smacruairi wrote: » I'm torn on this one. Id rather a demonstration of something like walking out of the first period of the morning or something to highlight inadequacies and the whole app and close contact fiasco. I'd also prefer they moved to restore pay equalities in light of the fact that we are donning the green Jersey. Just feels like we haven't set the table enough for a strike yet.
The Belly wrote: » When the country is in the state its in and in a government job with benefits it's not the time to strike.
Smacruairi wrote: » Yeah I agree. Though I also think that the govt is a disgrace with its approach to all things educational at the moment. They clearly aren't listening to any advice or assistance from the sector, nor applying WHO protocols either. So what do you do?
s1ippy wrote: » Will the public sector pay increase not restore teachers' salaries too? I know there are about three tiers now, are they going to be equalised? Maybe pay restoration could wait though. It's not my pocket being hit so I know it's easy for me to say but if I were still a teacher, I think my personal priority would probably be to get the school environments up to an adequate standard of safety and enable me to do my job. Again though, I'm not up to speed on the nuance of the pay situation anymore. I just think making it about that minimises the immediate risks posed. Contact tracing issues are an absolute mess though. Definitely 100% keep the app and keep your phone on you at all times, don't let them try and use the excuses. Although I know they banned pokémon go from working in schools so it's not outside the realms of possibility that they do that.
The Belly wrote: » it is a bit of a shambles I don't think they know what they are doing but strike action is not the solution. We don't need a winter of discontent now:)
s1ippy wrote: » Imo the winter of discontent is the hospitals full of school staff which may be on the horizon in the cold months ahead.
The Belly wrote: » nope, that won't happen. it will be ok. But can't have the country come to a standstill overstrikes... And if pay rise doesn't happen so be it.
Smacruairi wrote: » Just seems we are a bit unsure on what our outcome is. Everyone can agree that the social distancing in classes is non existent. So are we looking for half in half out? Certain year groups remotely? Extend the day and double the staff? Just striking because we are not happy just seems to be the message at the moment.
mickdw wrote: » I have sympathy for teachers as government seem to have taken the get on with it approach to teachers while every other area of society seems to be overly regulated. I dont know what the story is re ppe being provided but from the few school staff ive heard interviewed, funding sdems to be good so should stretch to ppe for staff at least. Im all for raising issues with department but this is absolutely the worst time to consider striking. Strike action should be ruled out day one here as there is just too much going down at the minute to add that into the mix.
El Sueño wrote: » <snip response to deleted post>https://www.irishtimes.com/news/education/asti-to-ballot-for-industrial-action-over-covid-19-safety-concerns-1.4359606 On Friday public health doctors who are to the forefront in the fight against Covid-19 said they would ballot for industrial action before Christmas if the Government did not resolve a pay issue . There are also growing tensions between health service trade unions and the HSE over redeployment and working arrangements. Last week, health service trade unions told the HSE that an overall agreement reached earlier this year to facilitate the re-deployment of staff as part of dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic was “null and void”. Unions said they would engage with health service management about individual or collective re-deployment of members on a case- by- case basis. “However, that engagement is conditional on the HSE demonstrating a commitment to appropriate, full, and meaningful engagement and consultation on all matters.” The letter sent this week shows further strains in the relationship between health service unions and management over what they see as a lack of consultation on a number of issues. It looks like they might have some help from GPs in their industrial action. It really shows up the inadequacies of the public service, not from the point of view that individuals aren't good at their jobs or anything, but that they're just shamefully ignored by the government at every juncture if they highlight the issues they face daily. To the point that they actually have to stop working, at the risk of huge disruption. The government is in a really precarious position with these threatened actions.
On Friday public health doctors who are to the forefront in the fight against Covid-19 said they would ballot for industrial action before Christmas if the Government did not resolve a pay issue . There are also growing tensions between health service trade unions and the HSE over redeployment and working arrangements. Last week, health service trade unions told the HSE that an overall agreement reached earlier this year to facilitate the re-deployment of staff as part of dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic was “null and void”. Unions said they would engage with health service management about individual or collective re-deployment of members on a case- by- case basis. “However, that engagement is conditional on the HSE demonstrating a commitment to appropriate, full, and meaningful engagement and consultation on all matters.” The letter sent this week shows further strains in the relationship between health service unions and management over what they see as a lack of consultation on a number of issues.
Anyway, I for one fully support a strike.
Teachers with serious medical conditions being forced into work. Staff not provided with protective gear. Absolutely fa priority testing. Teachers with no IT provided.
It just follows logic.
They surveyed members and the findings were not good so the ball is back in the teachers court
highly1111 wrote: » I'm confused by the purpose of this strike. What exactly do the union want as a result of this?? Is it more funding and more teaching positions? Because as far as I can see it says why we're going to vote but it doesn't say what outcomes we're striking for if that makes sense.
shesty wrote: » That was my reaction to reading about the strike yesterday. I am also wondering why they left it til now.Why didn't they just refuse to return to work?
shesty wrote: » Would have been just as effective, no? I mean intentionally not return, not by choice.
Wanderer78 wrote: » would that have been accepted, by all citizens?