nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

FPL Price Changes 2020/2021

Father Hernandez

Welcome back.

As per previous seasons, a thread to keep track of risers & fallers in Fantasy Premier League.

Generally, http://www.fplstatistics.co.uk/ is the best website to track.

https://www.fantasyfootballfix.com/price/ not bad either, decent for tracking live points during a GW.

We're back!

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

ScummyMan

UP:

Gabriel
Mitchell
Calvert-Lewin
Klich

DOWN:

Willock
Lallana
Giroud
Ziyech
Milivojevic
Walcott
Iwobi
Le Marchand
Johansen
Sessegnon
Gray
Benkovic
Cooper
Forshaw
Milner
Shaqiri
Keita
Matty Longstaff
Mousset
Ings
Boufal
Lamela
Sessegnon
Tanganga
Austin
Snodgrass

gammygils

Tusky wrote: »

What striker would ye recommend for max 6.9? Already have Mitrovic.

Son price drop has screwed me. Was planning on transferring him and Werner for KDB and a 7 striker. Other options is straight swap Aub for KDB.

Chris Wood or Che Adams

FHFC

Trimm Trabb wrote: »

Also 36 price drops and 6 price rises this week by my count.

Maybe all the transfers were being used on City and Utd players who were frozen but I would have thought 6 rises seems less than normal for GW1?

I dont keep the stats any more but I think only 6 rises into GW2 is pretty low. Not extremely low but 8 to 12 more the norm from memory.

And I think you're exactly right on the reason.

The ratio of falls to rises is high as usual.

The Megaphone

Tusky wrote: »

What striker would ye recommend for max 6.9? Already have Mitrovic.

Wilson

Tusky

What striker would ye recommend for max 6.9? Already have Mitrovic.

Son price drop has screwed me. Was planning on transferring him and Werner for KDB and a 7 striker. Other options is straight swap Aub for KDB.

callaway92

The Megaphone wrote: »

Have to say I feel a bit cheated as I wildcarded early and hoped to capitise more on price increases, especially on Bruno & KBD - just so it be more difficult for other players to slot these guys in down the line!

Cheated is Martial not going down in price last season with the mass-selling of him.

Yours above we don’t know yet certain algorithms decisions for players that didn’t play week 1.

The Megaphone

Have to say I feel a bit cheated as I wildcarded early and hoped to capitise more on price increases, especially on Bruno & KBD - just so it be more difficult for other players to slot these guys in down the line!

Shedite27

Trimm Trabb wrote: »

Also 36 price drops and 6 price rises this week by my count.

Maybe all the transfers were being used on City and Utd players who were frozen but I would have thought 6 rises seems less than normal for GW1?

That's fairly standard, everyone moves from the wide selection of week 1 punts to the players that did better in week 1

Benimar

1 up, 1 down for me.

Transfers following a similar pattern to the last number of years, more drops than rises.

Iused2likebusts

3 price drops for me this week saka, son and antonio.

Trimm Trabb

Also 36 price drops and 6 price rises this week by my count.

Maybe all the transfers were being used on City and Utd players who were frozen but I would have thought 6 rises seems less than normal for GW1?

touts

Trimm Trabb wrote: »

So no rises for Utd or City players. Once the deadline passes do you think they'll be starting from 0% or the 99% fplstatistics has them at?

That's pretty much a gift to be honest. I wanted to move Abua to KDB but then needed to move out Alli once it became apparent he wasnt going to be in Mourinho's plans. This early in the game if the usual changes in price happened I'd have been stuck with a useless 0.4 or 0.3 in the bank. Last Sunday looking at the transfers I fully expected Abua to fall 0.1 and KDB to rise 0.2 by now. So instead I can make that move today and have the full 0.5 cash on the bank which opens lots of options depending on how others play this game week. I can honestly say in the years playing this game I can't recall a transfer price change working out so well for me (which probably means I'm about to have a rash of serious injuries and straight red cards over the next two days).

ThunbergsAreGo

[Deleted User] wrote: »

I think it is worth it.

What I call a double ender.

Horrible to lose that 0.1m now and it’s also getting rid of a stinker.

Alli & Vinagre out for a -4 or -8, and avoiding the price drops this early in the season, is a no brainer for me.

Yeah i didn't do it, regret it now, I'll be stuck with him for a few weeks

Trimm Trabb

So no rises for Utd or City players. Once the deadline passes do you think they'll be starting from 0% or the 99% fplstatistics has them at?

shineon23

Irishphotodesk wrote: »

Theres no guarantee vinagre will drop, Jota is currently at the same level and he is rumoured to be joining Liverpool, which should in theory increase his ownership.

I also have vinagre in my team and have also lost 0.1 from mane points drop.

Jota joining Liverpool would decrease his appeal in my eyes.
Where would he fit in to their starting XI in the league?
I doubt he'd be a starter and so not guaranteed his minutes.

Would many have him over
-TAA/Robbo
or
-Salah/Mane (could save 5.6 million and reinvest elsewhere I suppose)

Then its a toss up for a 3rd spot between Jota and another Liverpool defender or Allison.
-Either VVD or Allison would be my pick over Jota.

Could be a case like Shaqiri, solid scorer before joining and now a non-option.
Similar to Bony to Man City, Demba Ba to Chelsea (to a lesser extent).

shineon23

Up

Vardy (£10.1M)
Digne (£6.1M)
Justin (£4.6M)

Down

Son (£8.9M)
Özil (£6.9M)
Torreira (£4.9M)
Nelson (£5.4M)
Guendouzi (£4.9M)
Rüdiger (£4.9M)
Abraham (£7.4M)
Hudson-Odoi (£5.9M)
McDonald (£4.9M)
Knockaert (£5.4M)
Iheanacho (£5.9M)
Thomas (£4.4M)
Firmino (£9.4M)
Lo Celso (£6.9M)
Grosicki (£5.4M)
Antonio (£6.4M)
Felipe Anderson (£6.4M)
Bowen (£6.4M)
Jota (£6.4M)
Vinagre (£4.4M)
Pulisic (£8.4M)
Lejeune (£4.4M)

[Deleted User]

Necronomicon wrote: »

Terrible first TV week for me. My transfer was Martial in, and not wanting to take a hit I watched Alli go down in value. Really wanted Vinagre to make it to the weekend, but looks set to drop tonight. Anyone else in this situation wondering if a -4 is worthwhile to save value? The loss of 0.1 takes so many transfer options off the table. And since he has to go...

Damn it, think I've answered my own question.

I think it is worth it.

What I call a double ender.

Horrible to lose that 0.1m now and it’s also getting rid of a stinker.

Alli & Vinagre out for a -4 or -8, and avoiding the price drops this early in the season, is a no brainer for me.

Irishphotodesk

Necronomicon wrote: »

Terrible first TV week for me. My transfer was Martial in, and not wanting to take a hit I watched Alli go down in value. Really wanted Vinagre to make it to the weekend, but looks set to drop tonight. Anyone else in this situation wondering if a -4 is worthwhile to save value? The loss of 0.1 takes so many transfer options off the table. And since he has to go...

Damn it, think I've answered my own question.

Theres no guarantee vinagre will drop, Jota is currently at the same level and he is rumoured to be joining Liverpool, which should in theory increase his ownership.

I also have vinagre in my team and have also lost 0.1 from mane points drop.

Irishphotodesk

ThunbergsAreGo wrote: »

I took a minus 4 on Ali.

I should go minus 8 for Vinagre as I'll just be doing it next week as a minus 4

That minus 8 feels big

Any change is a gamble, taking a hit requires a lot of confidence in the new players ability to produce points - sometimes straight away, but not always.

If you take a minus 8 you are putting yourself at a massive disadvantage especially if you are in any last man standing leagues or head to head leagues.

Do you not have a player on the bench that will get points (even appearance points might be enough to get you through the gameweek)

ThunbergsAreGo

Necronomicon wrote: »

Terrible first TV week for me. My transfer was Martial in, and not wanting to take a hit I watched Alli go down in value. Really wanted Vinagre to make it to the weekend, but looks set to drop tonight. Anyone else in this situation wondering if a -4 is worthwhile to save value? The loss of 0.1 takes so many transfer options off the table. And since he has to go...

Damn it, think I've answered my own question.

I took a minus 4 on Ali.

I should go minus 8 for Vinagre as I'll just be doing it next week as a minus 4

That minus 8 feels big

Necronomicon

Terrible first TV week for me. My transfer was Martial in, and not wanting to take a hit I watched Alli go down in value. Really wanted Vinagre to make it to the weekend, but looks set to drop tonight. Anyone else in this situation wondering if a -4 is worthwhile to save value? The loss of 0.1 takes so many transfer options off the table. And since he has to go...

Damn it, think I've answered my own question.

Western Pomise

Degag wrote: »

Does there seem to be way less increases than other years, even taking the city/utd players out of it?

Seem to remember players often going up .2m each week for first few weeks as that is when nearly all players are active

Rarely if ever seen a .2 rise in opening GW..... usually takes a player to be performing exceptionally for first 2 or 3 GW'S who then becomes a bandwagon to get .2 rise in a single GW.

Pukki was the early bandwagon last season.

FHFC

Degag wrote: »

Does there seem to be way less increases than other years, even taking the city/utd players out of it?

Seem to remember players often going up .2m each week for first few weeks as that is when nearly all players are active

No, 0.2 rises is same GW are rare enough.

For a good few years now avoiding drops has been more important than chasing rises.

A bankable rise on a player your not wanting to keep longterm isnt really worth chasing. The team value gain from an early wildcard for example is more about getting in the players you want long term before they are 0.2 or 0.3 or more expensive if you have to wait 2 or 3 weeks to get with FTs.

Degag

Does there seem to be way less increases than other years, even taking the city/utd players out of it?

Seem to remember players often going up .2m each week for first few weeks as that is when nearly all players are active

shineon23

Up:
___

Down:

Harry Wilson (£5.4M)
Haller (£6.4M)
Kolasinac (£4.9M)
Nketiah (£5.9M)
Aurier (£5.4M)
Yarmolenko (£5.9M)

CSF

stephenl15 wrote: »

They say:

The season has started, so clubs with blank gw1 should still rise

I think their description can be taken as extremely vague. Very little meaningful to be taken from anything they say about rises/falls because they tell so little.

stephenl15

They say:

Player prices change during the season dependent on the popularity of the player in the transfer market. Player prices do not change until the season starts.

The season has started, so clubs with blank gw1 should still rise

Pete_Cavan

I think there is a difference between announcing things about player price changes and clarifying the rules under which the price changes are happening (i.e. if a player won't be subject to price changes until their team has played its first game).

Dearg81

stephenl15 wrote: »

It's different not broadcasting when players will rise, to not letting people know that players prices are locked as they're not playing

Have they ever announced anything about player price changes though?

stephenl15

Dearg81 wrote: »

I like the idea of a price lock until a club plays 1 game. The ownership % of the players should get to a normal % now so we won't have to pay 0.1 or 0.2 extra. As to broadcasting it, I think they are being consistent by not. They never do share things like this.

It's different not broadcasting when players will rise, to not letting people know that players prices are locked as they're not playing