FG to still just do nothing for the next 5 years - part 2

Edgware wrote: »

Who is Mary Low?

Fixed.

Edgware

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Mary Low Michelle is 'two' people...you do know that?

Who is Mary Low?

Edgware wrote: »

Tossing off while thinking of a Mary Lou-Michelle in a threesome can cause that sudden urge to attack Leo

Mary Lou Michelle is 'two' people...you do know that?

Edgware

blanch152 wrote: »

What are you talking about?

I just noticed that you were up in the middle of the night posting about Leo again and I am worried for you.

Tossing off while thinking of a Mary Lou-Michelle in a threesome can cause that sudden urge to attack Leo

Truthvader

smurgen wrote: »

You sound indistinguishable to a MAGA supporter. Only a matter of time before I'd rather be a loyalist than a shinner t shirt gets printed.

Really.............."Open all the pubs" is exactly a Trump/ Boris type populist cry. The MAGA mob here are Sinn Fein

Truthvader wrote: »

And the problem is?????

Bubble head Mary Lou in a stupid and dangerous attempt to be popular with her lowlife followers makes a foolish call to open all the pubs (clearly could give a damn about the health and welfare of these same people) and Leo correctly calls her out on it.

Meanwhile all the fulltime Sinn Fein IRA posters are all over Boards making hysterical claims that we are all going to die because Leo did not shut down Waterford or the meat plants or whatever .

You sound indistinguishable to a MAGA supporter. Only a matter of time before I'd rather be a loyalist than a shinner t shirt gets printed.

blanch152

Bowie wrote: »

Is this the anon online bullying Varadkar does be talking about?
Here am I asking a question about the comparison between alleged policies to tackle the insurance issue as cited by the poster I quoted.
This is your addition?

What are you talking about?

I just noticed that you were up in the middle of the night posting about Leo again and I am worried for you.

Truthvader

smurgen wrote: »

On the day when Dublin businesses are facing further restrictions the minister for enterprise first attacks the opposition for government failure. You couldn't make it up. LV using tabloids to attack political opponents. He's more and more like Trump everyday and SF are his Obama/Hillary.

https://twitter.com/LeoVaradkar/status/1306885514662944770?s=19

And the problem is?????

Bubble head Mary Lou in a stupid and dangerous attempt to be popular with her lowlife followers makes a foolish call to open all the pubs (clearly could give a damn about the health and welfare of these same people) and Leo correctly calls her out on it.

Meanwhile all the fulltime Sinn Fein IRA posters are all over Boards making hysterical claims that we are all going to die because Leo did not shut down Waterford or the meat plants or whatever .

blanch152 wrote: »

You really do lose sleep over Leo.

Is this the anon online bullying Varadkar does be talking about?
Here am I asking a question about the comparison between alleged policies to tackle the insurance issue as cited by the poster I quoted.
This is your addition?

blanch152

Bowie wrote: »

Can you show that and also show what Varadkar's plan is?
You see I reckon Varadkar is just all mouth and has no concrete intent to do **** all. Prove me wrong.

You really do lose sleep over Leo.

On the day when Dublin businesses are facing further restrictions the minister for enterprise first attacks the opposition for government failure. You couldn't make it up. LV using tabloids to attack political opponents. He's more and more like Trump everyday and SF are his Obama/Hillary.

https://twitter.com/LeoVaradkar/status/1306885514662944770?s=19

I'll just leave this here. As I've said countless times,Leo varadkar is a hindrance to progress. Brings absolutely nothing to the table.

https://twitter.com/fionamitchell56/status/1306651855787884546?s=19

McMurphy

tobsey wrote: »

That’s value you’re talking about. People don’t want value from insurance, at least not in this country. They want it to be cheap, because they only buy it because they have to.

Not true, I choose policies based on what's included with the cover - not the cheapest one. I haven't seen the statistics, but I imagine fully comp policies outnumber third party only here which I've always found to be cheaper.

I'll concede to going with Maryanne's way of thinking though, I never automatically renew my insurance, if you don't shop around you'll get shafted by them

Doherty’s bill won’t get better value for money. It’ll get better policies for more money.

I've not seen the bill to form any opinion on it yet, but in saying that if it gets me first or business class levels of service for my previous economy ticket, that'll do me.

What's Leo's proposals?

tobsey wrote: »

There’s nothing in Doherty’s bill that will bring down the cost of insurance. If anything it’s going to add to the costs of insurance companies and they are going to up their premiums to cover the costs. Overall I think it’s a good bill for the consumer. It does put the consumer on a better footing when dealing with insurance companies whether they are renewing or claiming against the policy. However if we’re going to put those additional restrictions on insurance companies they can’t be surprised if prices don’t come down.

Can you show that and also show what Varadkar's plan is?
You see I reckon Varadkar is just all mouth and has no concrete intent to do **** all. Prove me wrong.

smurgen wrote: »

Why is LV talking about reducing premiums if what you're saying is true?

Pease having a good pop. Lovely to see.

https://twitter.com/PearseDoherty/status/1306647654206787585?s=19

Lovely. Does Varadkar think he's foolig anyone? What a waste.

tobsey

McMurphy wrote: »

This is a strange way of thinking tbh, having something "better" at the "same price" actually is cheaper no?

Two products, are for sale, one is premium, and the other is budget..

The premium one is now available at the previously mentioned budget products price?

So you're now paying the budget price for the premium product, that's cheaper in my book.

That’s value you’re talking about. People don’t want value from insurance, at least not in this country. They want it to be cheap, because they only buy it because they have to.

Doherty’s bill won’t get better value for money. It’ll get better policies for more money.

McMurphy

tobsey wrote: »

See my post above. That bill won’t save you a cent. It’s likely to cost you more. You might have better insurance as a result, but it won’t be cheaper.

This is a strange way of thinking tbh, having something "better" at the "same price" actually is cheaper no?

Two products, are for sale, one is premium, and the other is budget..

The premium one is now available at the previously mentioned budget products price?

So you're now paying the budget price for the premium product, that's cheaper in my book.

tobsey

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Good qs there.....what was the reason for delaying this insurance reforms

What is links between ffg and insurance industry,and how much extra have i paid in premiums as a result of this 2 year delay

See my post above. That bill won’t save you a cent. It’s likely to cost you more. You might have better insurance as a result, but it won’t be cheaper.

tobsey

smurgen wrote: »

Why is LV talking about reducing premiums if what you're saying is true?

Pease having a good pop. Lovely to see.

https://twitter.com/PearseDoherty/status/1306647654206787585?s=19

There’s nothing in Doherty’s bill that will bring down the cost of insurance. If anything it’s going to add to the costs of insurance companies and they are going to up their premiums to cover the costs. Overall I think it’s a good bill for the consumer. It does put the consumer on a better footing when dealing with insurance companies whether they are renewing or claiming against the policy. However if we’re going to put those additional restrictions on insurance companies they can’t be surprised if prices don’t come down.

McMurphy

Deleted User wrote: »

Yes, if they’re stupid enough to just hand over their money without trying for a better deal!

But, but, wait.....da gubberment should do their thinking for them!

You were singing an entirely different tune when FGs white elephant "Irish Water" were sending out bills and expecting gobshytes to just hand over money to them unquestionably.

It is nice to see you have suddenly seen the light and turned your back on blind subservience.

blanch152

Bowie wrote: »

#notanormalparty

Why are you bringing Sinn Fein into a thread about Fine Gael?

Strange, if I did it, you would criticise me. This is very puzzling.

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Yes, if they’re stupid enough to just hand over their money without trying for a better deal!

But, but, wait.....da gubberment should do their thinking for them!

Why is LV talking about reducing premiums if what you're saying is true?

Pease having a good pop. Lovely to see.

https://twitter.com/PearseDoherty/status/1306647654206787585?s=19

[Deleted User]

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Give us another greed is good quote there Maryanne...'they cannot be blamed for making as much money as they can', classic.

Don’t tell me. You actually pay as per quote? Awks!

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Give us another greed is good quote there Maryanne...'they cannot be blamed for making as much money as they can', classic.

#notanormalparty

Deleted User wrote: »

Yes, if they’re stupid enough to just hand over their money without trying for a better deal!

But, but, wait.....da gubberment should do their thinking for them!

Give us another greed is good quote there Maryanne...'they cannot be blamed for making as much money as they can', classic.

Deleted User wrote: »

If people don’t question their renewal quote and just pay up, then they’re fools. Never, ever renew any insurance without first ringing to beat them down. They cannot be blamed for trying to make as much money as possible.

Actually when they are all rigging the game they can. Fixed pricing. Do you not even listen to the party line before you defend it? The gist currently is wring your hands agree and do nothing.
FYI: we elect people to legislate and govern to look after our interests. TBF that's not what we get most of the time.

[Deleted User]

FrancieBrady wrote: »

It's the people's fault again? Yawn.

Yes, if they’re stupid enough to just hand over their money without trying for a better deal!

But, but, wait.....da gubberment should do their thinking for them!

[Deleted User] wrote: »

If people don’t question their renewal quote and just pay up, then they’re fools. Never, ever renew any insurance without first ringing to beat them down. They cannot be blamed for trying to make as much money as possible.

Did you not read news of the report of anti-competitive collision in insurance companies released by the Consumer Protection Commission today?

"The alleged anti-competitive co-operation consisted of public announcements of future motor insurance premium rises as well as other contacts between competitors.

All of this reduced levels of competition between the parties".

How does ringing around work if insurance companies are all collaborating?

Deleted User wrote: »

If people don’t question their renewal quote and just pay up, then they’re fools. Never, ever renew any insurance without first ringing to beat them down. They cannot be blamed for trying to make as much money as possible.

It's the people's fault again? Yawn.