K.O.Kiki wrote: » Not sure where you're remembering 500 euro from, at those exchange rates they would've been 420 euro (unless you mean the FE).
Squidgy Black wrote: » Bitwit saying that max power draw with a 3950x at stock settings was 537w, and 460w with a 3600xt. GamersNexus confirmed that at 100% under furmark it's pulling 320w at stock. Just in case anyone's still looking at whether their current power supply is up to the task.
EoinHef wrote: » The numbers coming from using a 1080 look great. Gonna be a big boost for me. Who knows when be able to get hands on a GPU though. Initially for me it would be founders or nothing,id be worried about some AIB coolers givin power usage. Would have to wait on individual reviews and my price range would be in the lower AIB range im guessing. Some priced at near £800 and screw paying that. If the founders is scarce I won't be too bothered as waiting for AMD would be the sensible thing to do anyway
K.O.Kiki wrote: » Anyone want to take a modded 2070 Super? I will accept 2 boxes of Tayto :pac:/s
Ryan451 wrote: » Does the Nvidia site even ship to Ireland or do we have to use Parcel Motel from the UK site?
MidlanderMan wrote: » What time tomorrow do the FE's go live? Do we have to buy from the nvidia website in Pounds Sterling?
Samuel T. Cogley wrote: » 2pm apparently, yes it's in Sterling, also you'll probably have to use parcel motel or similar.
BArra wrote: » eh? you can choose euro and ireland for delivery
Homelander wrote: » £800, flip away. I'll be trying to snap one of the £650 ones tomorrow.
Azza wrote: » I see Crysis Remastered was benchmarked by Crytek themselves on its second highest graphics preset at 1080p on a Ryzen 2700x RTX 2080Ti and 16GB ram. Average fps was 38. LOL think the RTX 3080 may have run into its first challenge!
Icyseanfitz wrote: » hoping to do a build next year, have a serious fear that the rrp prices will suddenly turn into 800-900euro for a 3080
jonski wrote: » I have watched a few reviews now and haven't heard much regarding noise from the card ( they might have mentioned it but my ears glazed over ) .
Robert ninja wrote: » The the original never performed very well either. So it's a choice between playing a low-performant FPS that has a minimum requirement of 512MB of RAM or a low-performant slightly different looking version of the same FPS that probably requires 1500% more hardware resources... and you have to buy it again :pac: