Mic 1972 wrote: » More personal attacks See why people don't take you guys seriously? If you want o advocate for what you think is right, you need to walk the walk. There is no coherence with your posts, one post is about equality and respect, the next post is about making fun of someone's OVER THE TOP FAKE tan.
[Deleted User] wrote: » In fairness, you called me racist because I criticised Trump's vanity.. it was a pretty stupid sand insulting remark.. Trump's fake tan has nothing to do with race.
Mic 1972 wrote: » So, you have an issue with the colour of his makeup then? I'm just genuinely asking here because a previous poster had no issue making fun of his orange skin tone which to me is as offensive as insulting any other skin tone
Mic 1972 wrote: » What offends you become acceptable when it's directed at others. That's an interesting take to equality
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » yup, A black persons skin tone is due to genetics. Trumps skin tone is due to vanity.
Biker79 wrote: » Not that it matters. What does matter are values ( whats important ), policies ( the framework to implement values ) and character ( the personal ability to implement policies ) Ignoring these while focusing on someones appearance...well....as Churchill once said : ' The best argument against Democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average (woke) voter '
Mic 1972 wrote: » I still see no reason why you feel entitled to insult someone's skin tone, whether it's genetic or fake tan. By applying double standards you are not doing a great job at advocating for your community
astrofool wrote: » Is making fun of someone's race equivalent to making fun of someone's makeup? Yes/no/deflected answer on a postcard please.
Mic 1972 wrote: » making fun of people's appearance is not what you would expect from advocates for equal respect.
westdublin wrote: » What Right do you think someone is oppressing when they make fun of him ?
Mic 1972 wrote: » are you implying that people in a position of power can be made fun of?
Tony EH wrote: » This entire post is a fantasy that's in your head. Including the Churchill quote.
Mic 1972 wrote: » I still see no reason why you feel entitled to insult someone's skin tone, whether it's genetic or fake tan.
By applying double standards you are not doing a great job at advocating for your community
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Its not his skin tone, it's his make up. Would you be OK with someone coming to your house with blackface makeup on? I'm not applying double standards skin tone and make up are two totally different things. Also, what is "my community"?
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Trump isn't shy about making fun of people so what's good for the Goose and all that
Biker79 wrote: » Trump is old school. He can take it on the chin and still get on with the job. Not many of his detractors could endure a fraction of the abuse he gets.
Biker79 wrote: » Must have hurt your feelings there champ. Sorry about that.
Mic 1972 wrote: » Very true and i admire him for it. Having thin skin seems to be the trend of the moment
westdublin wrote: » haha Old School.....spending about 3-4 hours every day getting his tan in a can and hair done. Then whining on twitter when he sees something he doesn't like, yeah sounds like a real old school tough guy.
westdublin wrote: » How thin would your skin have to be to refuse to be seen in public without your hair and makeup done ?
Mic 1972 wrote: » Sounds like what the entire woke movement revolves around to be honest
Deleted User wrote: » It's true though, that quote is not from Churchill and your overall points are nonsensical.