ExMachina1000 wrote: » Like this one:https://www.whitehouse.gov/openingamerica/A plan released in conjunction with the CDC (centre for disease control). The plan goes into detail about restrictions, phases (which can go back and forth) and other important plans laid out to reopen America while "living with the virus ". I think you will find that every government on the planet including your own has one of these plans. Like I said perpetual lockdown is over. The world has moved on. As have most people. There seems to be a stink in air of well I'm working from home so everyone else should be too. It's not reality
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Is this the same CDC that Trumps people are forcing to change reports because it makes the man baby look bad?
ExMachina1000 wrote: » It's not a report.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » plan/report/numbers of dead They change everything to make tan in a can look good.
Deleted User wrote: » Thing is, there's not an attributable increase from the protests. Protesters also tended to wear masks which Trump supporters have not, including at his rallies(RIP Herman Cain). Trump also egged on militias that were protesting state lockdowns.
Mic 1972 wrote: » Aren't you woke people supposed to be against name calling, body shaming and all? the usual double standards i guess
Deleted User wrote: » I wouldn't call Trump's overuse of fake tan "body shaming"....
Mic 1972 wrote: » but you would have no issue name calling someone for the colour of his skin Are you woke people all racists or is just you?
ollkiller wrote: » I actually stay clear of any man or woman that puts that much fake tan on. Wtf like.
Biker79 wrote: » We've already established why its practical for Trump to wear light makeup. Its due to high levels of media exposure. He's one of the most recognizable brands in the world. Which is in his terms an investment. He protects his investment by being presentable for the cameras. Its straightforward good business. Perhaps something lefties will struggle to grasp?
Cody montana wrote: » Why is he obese so?
ExMachina1000 wrote: » It's his body and his choice at the end of the day.
Rodney Bathgate wrote: » Fat shaming now?
Cody montana wrote: » Fact shaming.
Biker79 wrote: » Not that it matters. What does matter are values ( whats important ), policies ( the framework to implement values ) and character ( the personal ability to implement policies ) Ignoring these while focusing on someones appearance...well....as Churchill once said : ' The best argument against Democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average (woke) voter '
Deleted User wrote: » You can't see a difference between a person who is so vain that they glaze themselves in fake tan and an actual person's skin colour? Plenty of people who are famous and his age who aren't orange... Joe Biden isn't orange...
Mic 1972 wrote: » So, you have an issue with the colour of his makeup then? I'm just genuinely asking here because a previous poster had no issue making fun of his orange skin tone which to me is as offensive as insulting any other skin tone
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Your mistaking natural skin tone with Trumps fake skin tone.
Mic 1972 wrote: » it's his color of choice, and nobody who advocates for equality should have a reason to diminish someone else's color
astrofool wrote: » "Genuinely asking" why a grown man decides to dress up as an oompa-loompa, and then conflating it with racism. The answer is that you're either nasty, or of low IQ, come back which one and either you can be explained the answer in simple terms for a simpleton (IQ shaming?), or you can just be nasty in all posts, and stop pretending to hide it behind some faux concern for the orange tellytubby who's health and mental awareness are putting a nation at risk.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » He looks ridiculous and nobody who advocates for free speech should have a reason to diminish someone else's opinion. See....two can play that game
Mic 1972 wrote: » personal insults really? ..speaking about IQ