Cork_Guest wrote: » Surprised there’s so many saying tis the OPs fault....and we wonder why we’re ripped off so much in the country.
Sleeper12 wrote: » This is stretching consumer law way beyond reality. If OP wanted to watch football without blur then he should buy one with specs that cover fast moving objects. Maybe he did. I don't know. I can't buy a hatchback & my purpose is to go off roading and claim it not fit for purpose because it won't go off road without getting stuck in the mud. It's not what his purpose is. It's whatever the tv is designed for
Cork_Guest wrote: » Minimum basic requirement of a TV is to be able carry out its function to a satisfactory level. Soccer isn’t a new thing, so if it cannot keep up with the kicking of a ball then it’s not fulfilling its basic function. I’m not saying hitachi and Argos should be hailed in front of the courts and put to death, in just saying give her man a refund or replacement and be done with it.
Dav010 wrote: » That is assumed, if you want to watch fast sports, buy a TV with the spec that matches the picture quality you want.
Kevin Irving wrote: » An IPTV box is not a suitable test bed for a TV. It is subject to poor connection, compression, unknown image processing on both the transmission and recieving end. I had last generation UPC box (not Horizon), can't remember the brand, but it completely destroyed picture quality of RTE 2 HD (watching football) - so much so that I used the TV's own SaorView tuner which did a perfect job.
Dav010 wrote: » It is fulfilling its basic function, just not to the ops expectation. That does not make it unfit for purpose.
Cork_Guest wrote: » Please post the basic functionality specs for TVs that show what is required to watch soccer without stutter and blur. Thanks Also, who DOESNT expect any TV to be able to show the programs it receives to a decent standard? That’s like saying that it’s grand my car doesn’t steer in a straight line all the time because it was cheap!
Dav010 wrote: » Please show me where every TV must meet the purchasers expectations.
Cork_Guest wrote: » Urgh. So you can’t and you embarrass yourself more with a question for a question. I’m not getting dragged down to your level. If your expectations of standards of things are so low, then you’ve bigger problems.
Cork_Guest wrote: » If your expectations of standards of things are so low, then you’ve bigger problems.
Dav010 wrote: » Please show me where every TV must meet the purchasers expectations. Your car should steer in a straight line, but it doesn’t have to go from 0 to 60 in 5 seconds.
Dav010 wrote: » Before the op does anything else, he/she should try connecting TV to a sky box with a good HDMI cable, then see if quality is better than a steaming source. My expectations are higher when I buy items with better specs.
Kevin Irving wrote: » Lets be realistic, the IPTV is unlikely to be a Fire stick with NowTV and excellent WiFi and broadband. Rubbish in = rubbish out. At least get the basics right (high quality satellite with no processing on the box) and then we have a good baseline to compare. Doesn't matter if you have a Ferrari or a Focus, if you put crap fuel in, it will perform worse.
Cork_Guest wrote: » As I said. The IPTV was new information, but that isn’t what I’ve got an issue with. We get ripped off in this country compared to others because we don’t have the population and therefore there aren’t retailers in competition giving us the lowest prices and the best deals and therefore the luxury of ‘ah you’re not happy, right well let’s see if we can get you a better TV for a little extra or if not here’s your money back because I need you as a return customer rather than go to my competitor’ Having the attitude that it’s the OPs fault and so he’s lost his money and stuck with it does all of us no favours!
Cork_Guest wrote: Minimum basic requirement of a TV is to be able carry out its function to a satisfactory level. Soccer isn’t a new thing, so if it cannot keep up with the kicking of a ball then it’s not fulfilling its basic function.
Sleeper12 wrote: » If you buy a budget pc it will be siht for gaming. Games have been out since the 70s /80s. Not being able to play games on doesn't make it fit for purpose. If fact some 4k tvs can't keep up with high end games. Again this doesn't mean that they aren't fit for purpose. OP also says that it's hard to see that it's not preforming as well as he likes. He doesn't seem surprised that the shop doesn't see the fault. Read reviews on budget tvs and you will often read about motion blur on fast moving objects
Cork_Guest wrote: » A PCs primary function is not gaming, it isn’t even a secondary function, hence the fact that there are specific gaming consoles for gaming. Please point me towards these sport specific monitors, as they won’t be TVs at that point and I’ll be all over it, great for the rugby and I’m sure they’ll handle Netflix. Thanks.
Kevin Irving wrote: » An IPTV box is not a suitable test bed for a TV. It is subject to poor connection, compression, unknown image processing on both the transmission and recieving.
Gooey Looey wrote: » That depends on the PC, plenty build PCs just for gaming
Cork_Guest wrote: A PCs primary function is not gaming, it isn’t even a secondary function, hence the fact that there are specific gaming consoles for gaming. Please point me towards these sport specific monitors, as they won’t be TVs at that point and I’ll be all over it, great for the rugby and I’m sure they’ll handle Netflix. Thanks.
SureYWouldntYa wrote: » I know an IPTV isnt the best source, which is why i tried looking at football on youtube for reference and i see the same thing. Iv used the android box on a Bush tv from Argos and there’s no such issue, its this tv thats the problem It might be a cheap tv but im asking to watch football on it, its a basic thing surely. Im not looking for a refund because im getting 28 instead of 30 fps on the PS4 Argos said they’ll only automatically refund something if its unused, otherwise has to be a fault Im not surprised they arent seeing the fault while testing it in store because they’re watching it for a few seconds in the back room, if it was a ‘more obvious’ fault like a black line that you’d see on anything I’m sure they’d have been fine
Gooey Looey wrote: » Plug it into a decent satellite box, bet you'll not have any issue with a non compressed source
Celeste Prehistoric Splinter wrote: » I think people are focusing too much on the soccer. I would imagine this issue affects any relatively fast moving picture including action films, games and some other sports.
Cork_Guest wrote: » How did you pay? If by credit card then just call them and explain the situation and ask them to refund the cost. If it were me I’d be in there saying I’m not accepting the product but I’m happy to pay a few extra bucks to change it for a better one. You’re one downside here is you’re streaming the service, without seeing the throughout, latency and contention on your broadband service and home wifi then you can’t prove it’s the TV.
Spleodar wrote: » It would be an interesting small claims case. I can’t see how a TV being unable to display a broadcast quality football match is fit for purpose. Gaming is a different issue, but broadcast television should be displayed without issues. Try tuning the tv to match on Saorview as it will eliminate any issues being caused by your set top box. If that’s still blurring, I can’t really see how the TV meets the requirement of being able to display tv signals.