sheff_ wrote: » Directly behind the sextant site, before you cross the road to the old redbrick tram buildings. So much fuss over the sextant because people enjoyed a pint there, yet if the station and adjoining building which are far superior and historically more important were knocked we wouldn't have heard a sound from most.
Gardner wrote: » spot on! the area looks much cleaner with the sextant knocked. pity we wont be seeing any works there for the rest of 2020 and 2021.
Mushy wrote: » Think thatll be the rooftop bar, like at the one in Dublin. Unsure if therell be a swing for any politicians to fall from though
the beer revolu wrote: » The area looks cleaner because the site is cleared. You do realise that the plan is to build on the site?
Gardner wrote: » obviously you didn't read my post in full. There won't be any development there for the rest of 2020 or 2021 and that has come from JCD.
mire wrote: » Fantastic contemporary building - more of this please
marno21 wrote: » The bellwether for the Albert Quay Tower will be construction of the new Carey Tools premises at Blackash. Until work starts on that, we are more than 6 months away from significant construction at Albert Quay If the apartments are mothballed, it made sense to knock the Sextant regardless to protect the site value. With the uncertainty out there at the minute and the uncertainty as to what’ll happen in the future, it maximise the potential for the site and removes the Sextant as a constraint should there be a new planning application for the site.
the beer revolu wrote: » Why is it that when people dislike a building they always seem to assume that everyone else feels the same? .
cantalach wrote: » You got me wrong there...there was a smilie for a reason. I like the Dean for the boldness of it if nothing else. And I think it will only be possible to judge it properly when the whole area has been redeveloped. That said, every time I see the Dean I wonder when some idiot is going to try to use it as a giant skate board ramp!
whisky_galore wrote: » Uglier than a mule's arse
cantalach wrote: » That said, every time I see the Dean I wonder when some idiot is going to try to use it as a giant skate board ramp!
Mav11 wrote: » Certainly the Sextant was no architectural gem, but it did have some merit and charm. More importantly for Albert quay, with the old railway station on one side it provided relief and a break from what could become an overpowering area of shabby steel and glass boxes. Attempts should also have been made to retain the stone wall to the side of the pub and incorporate it in to any new development.
Mav11 wrote: » Just because its new doesn't mean that it won't get bland and run down looking, in a very short space of time. Without doubt, very good work has been done on restoring old buildings over the years. But all you have to do is look at 1 and 1a South Mall and tell me that those buildings have blended in or aged well well over the years??
Mav11 wrote: » Just because its new doesn't mean that it won't get bland and run down looking, in a very short space of time. Without doubt, very good work has been done on restoring old buildings over the years. But all you have to do is look at 1 and 1a South Mall and tell me that those buildings have blended in or aged well over the years??
whisky_galore wrote: » They never stay smart for long. When they tire of constant window cleaning they will get that neglected Apollo House/former USSR building look with cockeyed and broken blinds.
questionmark? wrote: » Different opinions are welcome but that's just hyperbole!
the beer revolu wrote: » Fair enough. Maybe not with you but don't you find it to be true, generally?