Johnny_BravoIII wrote: We are blessed with truly regressive people in positions of leadership locally who seem to disagree with the above. I'm not sure why. As a nation we have got the basics in population planning badly wrong in the last 40 years.
Johnny_BravoIII wrote: » I can't see why anyone living in Galway would argue against investment in rail. Specifically upgrading the lines at Claregalway, Athenry, Gort. 2-way fast rail serving the city with parknrides. Two light rail lines serving the city centre. Priority give to buses walking and cycling. This type of stuff is best practice internationally. It's no-brainer stuff which has worked in countless cities worldwide. We are blessed with truly regressive people in positions of leadership locally who seem to disagree with the above. I'm not sure why. As a nation we have got the basics in population planning badly wrong in the last 40 years. The bypass is simply a continuation down a roads-based solution to traffic which doesn't work. The only hope for the city is E Ryan stays in power for 5+ years and manages to push solutions past the local opposition.
CowboyTed wrote: » This is becoming like groundhog day.... Galway has Low Population Density Bad Weather It has no bypass.. So all traffic has to come into the town. All commutes from the populated part of the town to any other city has to go through the town. I am not against Public Transport but the town needs a bypass... Cycling is underused with what infrastructure they got. Buses have merit but I would like to see a proper trial to see if Galway will use them at proper levels <25% at least... At the moment like it or not, Private Cars are carrying the most people for space used... Just look at the numbers going across the Bridge... There is barely any cyclists maybe 1-2 while lines of cars...
Johnny_BravoIII wrote: » Galway is dangerous for non experienced cyclists. There is no cycling infrastructure in the city. This is why there are low participation rates. You understand this fact, right? Galway regionally has low population density due to 40 years of bad planning, 1-off housing etc. How do we begin to tackle this issue? You keep mentioned the fact that stuff needs to be trialled. Who is saying the opposite.
CowboyTed wrote: » First there is a cycle lane continuously from Salthill & Knocknacarra to Ballybrit
ChunkyLover54 wrote: » There isn't.
CowboyTed wrote: » Apart from the roundabouts it is continuous... Where do you say it is missing?
CowboyTed wrote: » First there is a cycle lane continuously from Salthill & Knocknacarra to Ballybrit.... This is one of the main through-fares during peak hours yet few cyclists. That is infrastructure.
One off Housing is outside Galway issue but it does of course drive people into cars and makes PT near impossible. Bad planning is bad planning... Can't take it back... It is what it is... It was bad planning that puts employment on one side of the city and people living on the other.
Johnny_BravoIII wrote: » It's bizarre that you would suggest the bike like from Knocknacarra to Ballybrit is suitable for anyone less than a very experienced cyclist. The Hospital roundabout? Terryland? Do you really young, older, less experienced people trying to cycle in-and-around Galway. You really have closed your mind to rational thinking here. You can't even identify that Galway is an unfriendly place to cycle a bike.
Johnny_BravoIII wrote: » The only hope for the city is E Ryan stays in power for 5+ years and manages to push solutions past the local opposition.
Jazmin Harsh Gold wrote: » Surprised he stayed awake.
gordongekko wrote: » This man can even stay awake in the dail during a debate on employment rights.
LostDuck wrote: » A good test of apparent cycling infrastructure is would you let your primary school kids cycle to school on it on their own. Some short stretches, there's enough of a bridge of facilities, like between some estates and schools in Knocknacarra. But anyone that'd let their kids cycle through any of the Terryland routes to get across town obvious hasn't done it themselves.
CowboyTed wrote: » Buses have merit but I would like to see a proper trial to see if Galway will use them at proper levels <25% at least...
Mr_A wrote: » When a good service was provided to Doughiska / Renmore / Roscam / Parkmore with the 409 the use went up massively and it ended up providing 2/3s of all fares in the city. People will use good services- and even the 409 is pretty hampered by traffic etc.
what_traffic wrote: » The large multilane roundabouts are NOT missing - thats the problem CowboyTed, but you already know this. Where is the rest of your mythical underused network located? I know - do you?
Johnny_BravoIII wrote: » It's bizarre that you would suggest the bike like from Knocknacarra to Ballybrit is suitable for anyone less than a very experienced cyclist. The Hospital roundabout? Terryland? Do you really young, older, less experienced people trying to cycle in-and-around Galway. You really have closed your mind to rational thinking here. You can't even identify that Galway is an unfriendly place to cycle a bike. Groundhog day is right. The solution to bad planning is not further regressive bad transport management. By the way, I don't rule out the need to build the bypass. I'm just saying that the decision needs to be part of a progressive approach to town planning and transport management. I don't see any signs people with authority in Galway are thinking this way.
CowboyTed wrote: » So cyclists have to wait at Roundabouts... That is a total of two roundabouts. Sorry so does everyone... Tell us how we are going to solve that one. . .. The method of making driving worse and worse is just not working
CowboyTed wrote: » The main aim of the transport plan is to make driving so ****ty people will be forced to use other means... Never mind the lop pop density, bad weather, hilly terrain and no bypass...
?Cee?view wrote: » The most true words on this whole thread.
what_traffic wrote: » Issue is not about waiting; its about the safe method to cross/turn said junction as a person walking or cycling. Method? What is the method you talk about. Is this your own method or who is forcing this method upon you?
CowboyTed wrote: » We have heard the mantra here "More Roads = More Cars".... We haven't seen anything to wonder why it has been an utter failure, just continue on the same path. I hope you can see the point I am trying to make?
CowboyTed wrote: » So cyclists have to wait at Roundabouts... That is a total of two roundabouts. Sorry so does everyone... Tell us how we are going to solve that one.
what_traffic wrote: » I do. Fail better, fail more often, fail again.
CowboyTed wrote: » ... Car Owners pay for the roads.
Any measure designed to benefit someone not in a car is interpreted by you and others as a measure to 'get' drivers.