AndrewJRenko wrote: » From https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=114420125&postcount=1045:D:D:D:D
Mav11 wrote: » There was a piece on Pat Kenny this morning, just before 10, on the new cycle lanes on Strand Rd and Seapoint Ave. For the most part the public attitude to Seapoint Ave was largely positive whilst that for Strand Rd was overwhelmingly negative due to the impact on traffic passing through Sandymount village.
Cyrus wrote: » seapoint avenue still causing confusion in blackrock, i was behind two or three cars at the weekend trying to turn down, then some hero on a motorbike was heading down and some woman jumped out in front of him roaring
HeidiHeidi wrote: » I can't understand why the residents of Monkstown village aren't going mad about the DL new arrangements! I regularly travel to DL harbour, and Monkstown is just a backed-up traffic mess these days. I have no doubt the cycle lane on Seapoint Ave is a joy to use, but my goodness the knock-on effect on Monkstown is awful.
Cyrus wrote: » both monkstown and DL are a disaster traffic wise now, which will worsen into the winter as the fair weather cyclists lose interest.
Homesick Alien wrote: » I travel by bike and car through Monkstown and Dun Laoghaire every day on the school runs.
hayoc wrote: » Yep - I work in Dun Laoghaire and myself and the vast majority of people in the office (some of whom also live in the area) are really noticing that traffic is a disaster in the area now. As an aside the garage by the Purty Kitchens business has been so badly affected that they may not survive.
Cyrus wrote: » impressive :eek: joking aside i notice a significant difference but i only drive that way at weekends
Larbre34 wrote: » There really is no justification for the congestion being caused by the measures being left in place.
Larbre34 wrote: » Yeah talking to a few party hacks I know through my own work, the pressure from County Councillors on the Council executive is going to increase greatly in the next while to remove the "temporary" cycleways, especially as the weather deteriorates and the days get shorter. There really is no justification for the congestion being caused by the measures being left in place.
ted1 wrote: » No loss there , not a great petrol station. Have the office staff just returned? It was bad before the bike lane as they changed the light sequence and only a few cars get through. Why don’t they try cycling ?
hayoc wrote: » Im sure itll be a loss to the staff and business owner. We have had staff in and out throughout lockdown. Many people do cycle, and walk, but they have eyes - they can see the traffic is a disaster as a result of this. It hasnt impacted me personally as I do odd hours in the office, just calling it as I see it. Disaster.
Mav11 wrote: » They were always very expensive in terms of fuel prices, perhaps if they had been more competitive then they would have been more viable. Traffic in the area has always been disastrous, there are simply too many cars on the roads in Irish cities. In this instance it seems to me that the increased traffic backups are more a function of the changes to traffic light sequencing, than the cycle lanes.
hayoc wrote: » Eh - the coast road is now one way the entire way - so all the traffic from there has been pushed back into the local towns and surrounds. It was fine last summer. Its not been fine since the one way came in. Its nonsensical to suggest that the traffic issues that are now occurring from Blackrock as far as Sandycove and up as far as Sallynoggin are because of a change to traffic light sequencing - unless every single traffic light in the entire area has suddenly changed.
Homesick Alien wrote: » Nothing impressive about it. I usually bike with the kids in the trailer and if it's lashing I drive. First morning I had to drive I thought it would be chaos with all the talk of the traffic so left super early. Took less than 10 mins so we were sitting outside the school for another 15 before we could go in.
Mav11 wrote: » See previous posts, they have not suddenly changed, the changes were implemented at the beginning of lockdown to favour pedestrians. This is not a binary issue, or the fault of any one particular initiative. You also have to remember that the reduction in public transport and peoples reluctance to take the bus or Dart, is contributing to increased traffic.
hayoc wrote: » Its true that there is a lack of people using public transport, however, its also true that many businesses in the area still only have limited staff in the office so there is less traffic in the area from that - and yet still its become a disaster.
ted1 wrote: » Traffic is a disaster because of cars , if those people where around before the cycle lane started they’d have seen that it’s the traffic lights causing the problems. Also the front driver looking at his phone doesn’t help
Cyrus wrote: » sorry i dont understand the point, traffic is a disaster because of cars? Generally the people referring to traffic are referring to cars, the cars that were there before all of this when traffic wasnt as bad. Saying traffic is a disaster because of cars isnt making sense to me. the changes in the light signals arent helping but one assumes that there is a link between that and the push on cycling.