ExMachina1000 wrote: » One up side of Biden winning will be when hard left types realise that Biden is centred enough on most issues. Where will they turn then? Trump gave them jobs. Biden will give them taxes
Pa ElGrande wrote: » The president does not have the authority to set taxes. The tax system varies across the United States, there are local property taxes or rates, state level taxes on income and sales and federal taxes. Tax policy is going to be determined by the makeup of congress and the state governments, so you could have a Biden presidency and a Republican congress. There is a movement to undo the Reagan era tax cuts. Here is what is happening recently:New Jersey hikes gas tax due to revenue lost amid pandemicTax hike on California millionaires would create 54% tax rateCalifornia 13.3% Tax Rate May Be Raised To 16.8%...RetroactivelyNashville approves new budget with 34% tax hike, more funds for police, schools
Billy Mays wrote: » You think hard left types don't already know that Biden is centre on most positions? The only people who think Biden is a radical leftist are the fcukwits who believe everything Trump tells them
Danzy wrote: » On things like Trade and finance Biden is well to the right of Trump.
Justin Credible Darts wrote: » If Trump wins, we will get all the usual excuses, of rigged election, putin was involved, the post office works for Trump, biden did not get the same air time etc etc etc. What the biden supporter wont accept is that if Trump wins it will be because it will be was the americans WANT. What does that tell you ?
BobbyMalone wrote: » If Trump loses, do you not think there will be a 'rigged election' narrative?
Justin Credible Darts wrote: » possibly but I suspect a biden loss would see far more crying than a trump loss. The biden supporters come across as bigger whiners. I dont even like trump or the republicans, but the democrats are so full and 2 faced is it any wonder people see through them
BobbyMalone wrote: » You'd be wrong on that. Trump was already 'whining' about the 2016 election being rigged before he won. His then running mate had to reassure people that they would 'definitely' accept the results if they lost, but also 'whined' about media bias. And he's doing it again this time around. It's mad that people who have an interest in this, have clearly seen news items like those mentioned above, but still think that it will be the Democrats doing the 'whining'. Edit: What Timberrrrrrrr said, I'm a very slow typer.
Justin Credible Darts wrote: » I was referring to the supporters of each candidate who will be crying
Man with broke phone wrote: » What I cant understand is people who have a problem with making america great again. Surely if you live in america you would want it made great again? Are they burning all the businesses because they want to make america worse than it is?
Tony EH wrote: » You're naivety is astronomical if you don't think the the same gibberish will be spouted by Trump and co. if he loses.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Trump has already said, The only way he can lose the election is because its rigged, he has literally got his excuses in early and no matter how much/little he loses by he will cause all sorts of problems.
Conclusion The likelihood that the 2020 election will not produce an agreed winner, barring effective active measures from Trump, is nearly certain. Based on the Northop/Standard model, Trump has an over 90% chance at winning an election if following the rules in place in the past dozen election cycles. This explains why the DNC has introduced as many X factors as possible – a politicized Covid-19 response, slanted news which riles up reliable protest movement assets towards rioting and looting, and a mailed-out ballots scheme which is indistinguishable in effect from known problem vote riggings techniques like ballot harvesting. It is clear that the DNC wants to produce no clear winner, and use some combination of article XX, XII, and provisions as reinforced by related constitutional provisions for the continuation of government, and NSDP 51. Because there are so many variables, possible counter measures, and new ‘X factors’ that can be introduced, this is a developing story with no clear outcome now estimable. If it is true that the NSA is backing Trump, then this provides strong reason to believe that this candidate will emerge the winner out of the fray. In either event, future X factors are almost certain.source
Eric Cartman wrote: » After Hillary lost we had protests, a baby balloon made, crying at the inauguration, vandalism, Hillary writing a book and full scale mass investigations into electoral fraud and media supported accusations of Russian interference. Prominent social media and news commentators crying publicly etc... I think if trump lost sure you'd have a few conspiracy nuts screaming rigged, you'd have a lot of upset people, but I think it would in actuality be a hell of a lot smaller and the media reporting of it would be a lot smaller. Regardless of the side you're on, its alright to admit that the democratic side has more of a flare for public over-reactions and overdramatics, that can be admitted without compromising support for them or believing they're the better side.
Eric Cartman wrote: » After Hillary lost we had protests, a baby balloon made, crying at the inauguration, vandalism, Hillary writing a book and full scale mass investigations into electoral fraud and media supported accusations of Russian interference. Prominent social media and news commentators crying publicly etc...
Eric Cartman wrote: » Regardless of the side you're on, its alright to admit that the democratic side has more of a flare for public over-reactions and overdramatics, that can be admitted without compromising support for them or believing they're the better side.
Cahaly managed to pick up support for Trump that all other pollsters missed by employing a unique method that sought to measure support from voters who'd been “inactive” in recent election cycles, as well as adding a question to his surveys designed to isolate the effect of social desirability bias among Trump voters – the concept that people won’t tell pollsters their true intentions for fear of being stigmatized or being politically incorrect. After asking voters who they were supporting in 2016, the pollster followed up by asking them who they thought their neighbors were supporting, Trump or Clinton. Cahaly consistently found a high degree of variance between who respondents said they were voting for and who they thought their neighbors were voting for, suggesting there was in fact a “shy Trump effect” at playsource