TitianGerm wrote: » To be honest you'd be as well keeping your card and using it for something else than sell for €150.
Hyzepher wrote: » If the 3070 turns out to be the card that Nvidia have promoted then I predict the following once supply is adequate; 1080ti - €200 2060/Super - €150 2070 - €200 RX 5700XT - €200 2070 Super - €220 2080 - €240 2080 Super - €260 2080ti - €400 These could go even lower if AMD releases anything mildly competitive
jebidiah wrote: » There's a lot of entertainment on adverts at the moment. Lads getting low balled by 3-400 euro etc. Very good stuff. I'm not sure why CEX are buying the 2080ti for 650?! Would make a lot of sense to off load your card there if you're worried
Samuel T. Cogley wrote: » I think the 3070 will only be faster in RT, maybe DLSS also - USP will be this streaming technology. I still think the 2080ti will be the faster card in the real world. The memory is going to hobble the 3070 I'd imagine. So I reckon the 2080ti will hold around about €500.
JoyPad wrote: » Don't forget the 3070Ti or 3070 Super. Sell the 2080Ti for 650 and get the 3070Ti for the same money, or slightly less.
Q. When the slide says RTX 3070 is equal or faster than 2080 Ti, are we talking about traditional rasterization or DLSS/RT workloads? Very important if you could clear it up, since no traditional rasterization benchmarks were shown, only RT/DLSS supporting games. [Justin Walker] We are talking about both. Games that only support traditional rasterization and games that support RTX (RT+DLSS).
Longing wrote: » Heads up. My local CEX would not take my 1080. Assistant ask did I check price online I said yes. She answered we have to ring head office over price and purchase. 2hrs later when I went back she give me the card back and said come back next week.
Mr Crispy wrote: » Some observations from Hardware Unboxed re: the Doom numbers.https://twitter.com/HardwareUnboxed/status/1301797023000084480?s=20https://twitter.com/HardwareUnboxed/status/1301797851962331138?s=20
Squidgy Black wrote: » The Doom video was a 3080 vs a 2080TI though as opposed to a 2080 was it not? Or am I reading the interpretation of it wrong Edit: yeah these are the stats regarding the Digital Founders video where they showed % differences over the 2080
Samuel T. Cogley wrote: » Hmmm now I'm torn as I'm low refresh rate 3440x1440. No one ever caters to us :pac: Always wondered what 4K+ Ultra wide is and is anyone doing these at 34"?
Hyzepher wrote: » In my opinion, if you don't already have a 2080ti and have had no need for one then a 3070 (at promised performance) will be sufficient for 90% of people. I would maintain that maybe a 2080ti would be more than enough for anyone. The concept of future proofing is flawed anyway
K.O.Kiki wrote: » They're not AFAIK, it's just been misreported.
Wonda-Boy wrote: » Its all relative tbh, If I did have a 2080 or 2080ti I would not be going mental like half the PC community. Its not like they are bad cards overnight now is it, I get that they were hugely overpriced at launch but alot of PC tech is not just GPUs. I am delighted to get the AMPERE as my card is so old, so its a win win for me. I really dont get why people who have a 2080ti for say and year or so are whinging like bitches....fair enough if you only bought a 2080ti in the last month but if you are buying cutting edge GPUs like this is the 1st place you are obviously a enthusiast so should have been aware what is around the corner.