ben.schlomo wrote: » You had a busker outside your window on a non pedestrianised street? So he blocked the footpath? Which street was it out of interest as i can't say I've ever seen a busker on a non pedestrianised street in town. Strange it's only ever happened to you. And you couldn't resist the bike phobia story.
LostDuck wrote: » Really heart-warming seeing the number of bikes doing the morning school run in Knocknacarra this week. Next to the schools is still carnage with cars but nice flow of bikes (parents and kids) on the approaching roads. Wonder how much is this boosted from the number of adults that got back on bikes during lockdown. The lack of bus services probably helped too!
LostDuck wrote: » Mrs OBumble what do you enjoy about living in the city centre? Genuine question. It sound like you'd prefer living slightly outside of town along a bus route to work?
fergiesfolly wrote: » Soooooooo, you want the convenience of city centre living. But without the inconvenience of people.
ben.schlomo wrote: » That's Buttermilk Lane/Walk, pedestrianised too.
McGiver wrote: » Spot on. Basically, a bit asocial attitude and somewhat delusional. Sorry Mrs, no offence intended City Centre living means convenience but also potential inconvenience from crowds/people. You cannot expect no people around while living in the city centre - anywhere in the world.
Jazmin Harsh Gold wrote: » Its funny watching you make these statement to MOB while being guilty of exactly the same thinking yourself's with the close streets to cars, no cars into the city centre, get rid of parking etc etc. You want the convenience of the city but without the inconvenience of people who want/need to travel into the city to go about their business and using cars is the way many want or need to make these trips.
donvito99 wrote: » It's not the inconvenience of the people going about their business that they're getting at, it's the inconvenience to everyone that their convenience causes. Mrs O wants that trappings of suburban living in an Irish Town Centre and basically wants the centre to revolve around residents only.
Jazmin Harsh Gold wrote: » I dont agree with Mrs O either, if you live in the city you have conveniences like she described but you have to put up with noise (from multiple sources), crowds, traffic, cars, bikes, small apartments/houses, reduced privacy etc.
McGiver wrote: » As I said - the council are idiots. They have only 5 shots (a systemic issue on its own) - and they shoot them at wrong places and in a wrong way... They didn't upgrade the most important ones and they selected a wrong design. We enthusiasts would make a better assessment and decision, and we're not rocket (bus) scientists. Even if they let people vote for the location and design of the bus shelters it would generate a better outcome. I really don't know what to do with this council lot. I think I will send a letter to the council at least. It would be good if multiple people did the same. Where are the new shelters? I'll have a look and take a picture which I'll send to the council along with the letter/email.
zell12 wrote: » It is the NTA who decide where to locate bus stops and where to erect shelters on advice from the local authority. Who funds the shelters, maintains them and gets advertising contracts..dunno.
what_traffic wrote: » https://galwaybayfm.ie/podcasts/galway-talks-with-keith-finnegan-thursday-3rd-september-2020-2-2/ from 1:21:52 onwards
Jazmin Harsh Gold wrote: » Couldn't listen to any more of that clown that the snippet I head on the radio this morning. Surprised he stayed awake. He has pi**ed off enough people anyway with his anti bypass nonsense going by the reaction.
what_traffic wrote: » What bypass is this?
ThePentagon wrote: » The location of the new bus shelters was influenced mainly by the commercial needs of the company that is paying for them, the advertising firm JCDecaux. Locations are chosen not to accommodate the needs of bus users but more for their potential advertising exposure. Any benefit those bus shelters provide for commuters is entirely coincidental : D
LostDuck wrote: » The man talks sense, get some solutions moving now that don't need to wait 10, 20, 30 years for this silver bullet wonder road.
Johnny_BravoIII wrote: We are blessed with truly regressive people in positions of leadership locally who seem to disagree with the above. I'm not sure why. As a nation we have got the basics in population planning badly wrong in the last 40 years.