Allinall wrote: » Coveney pulling out, as he doesn't think he'll get the trade portfolio.https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/coveney-not-expected-to-allow-name-go-forward-for-eu-commissioner-position-1.4345087?_ga=2.95705563.655784567.1599122767-535687603.1599122757
wrangler wrote: » More valuable to us here anyway, he's a great wingman for varadkar
stockshares wrote: » I don't know how it can benefit Varadkar. He's Varadkar's main rival for leader and has the support of the Party members on the ground.
fly_agaric wrote: » Not surprised. There is really so much crap that seems to be hitting the EUs fan or about to hit the fan (economic effect of the pandemic, deteriorating relationships with both China and the US at the same time...) that having a "newbie" in that role at this time is not a great idea. Brexit & future relationship with the UK is very, very important for us but maybe a less pressing issue for the EU as a whole.
FrancieBrady wrote: » They will nominate 2 women I bet and try to rehabilitate Frances Fitzgerald. Varadkar still smarting that her career ended in the disgrace of misleading the Dàil.
ShamNNspace wrote: » All for the optics now. The Eu job is already decided, one of the picks will be a pacemaker
Allinall wrote: » Coveney pulling out, as he doesn't think he'll get the trade portfolio.
Muahahaha wrote: » I presume Coveney had put feelers out in Brussels on whether or not Ireland would get to keep the trade portfolio and it came back negative. If Coveney is not getting it then theres no way I can see Mairead McGuinness or Francis Fitzgerald getting it. All of which means Big Phil has lost us the trade portfolio with Brexit trundling down the tracks. He didnt even want it anyway, he was off to the WTO until Ursula told reigned him in. What a mess created by Hogan and Fine Gael here, the senior hurling we were promised is still at Junior B level.
stockshares wrote: » I agree with most of your post but I can't see how they would not give it to McGinness. Unless they specifically want her for another job.
Allinall wrote: » Agree fully. Hogan started the ****show, but it was ably enhanced by all three of MM, LV and ER. I would say it was entirely in their hands to have Hogan left in the position, which would have been the better outcome all round.
Muahahaha wrote: » ...........B]the Garda Commissioners intervention[/B] ................
stockshares wrote: » Pacemaker or peacemaker or both.:)
It was an act of complacency - a lack of concentration on my part. I didn't definitively go through the regulations and I regret that now.
To be honest, it (a by-election) is the furthest thing from my mind.
Psychiatric Patrick wrote: » What intervention?
Muahahaha wrote: » The Gardai who stopped and cautioned Hogan for driving while holding a phone told their superiors and it went up the chain all the way to Drew Harris. Harris then told Michael Martin and Helen McEntee who presumbaly told Varadkar who told Eamon Ryan as a government partner. The event of Hogan being stopped by the Gardai in Kildare was known by the three party leaders before Hogan produced his statement saying that he went direct from Kilkenny to Clifden. So at an early stage the three party leaders knew Hogan was lying because of the info provided to them by Drew Harris. Hogan was naive in thinking that he Garda caution in Kildare would not get to Harris and hence the government, he thought he could get away with the Kilkenny to Clifden lie but he actually end up shooting himself in the foot by lying.
Muahahaha wrote: » Yeah Harris is covered by a law that says he can inform the government of the day of any instances that might effect their power to govern. Hogan getting stopped was covered by that so Harris told Martin as Taoiseach and McEntee as Minister of Justice It was a different scenario though when Mick Wallace was caught using a phone and Callinan told Shatter who later used it against Wallace in a Prime Time debate. In that instance Wallace was not a member of government so it was done solely for political purposes.
Psychiatric Patrick wrote: » To be honest, I thought it was a requirement that the Guards inform the government of any encounters between them and ministers. Or even of serious incidents involving immediate family. How would Hogan being stopped have come to Harris' attention? Did a senior Guard just happen to notice it or does Pulse flag incidents involving certain people?
41.— (1) The Garda Commissioner shall keep the Minister and the Secretary General of the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform fully informed of the following: (a) matters relating to significant developments concerning— (i) the preservation of peace and public order in the State, (ii) the protection of life and property in the State, and (iii) the protection of the security of the State; (b) significant developments that might reasonably be expected to affect adversely public confidence in the Garda Síochána; (c) matters relevant to the accountability of the Government to the Houses of the Oireachtas; (d) any other matters that, in the Commissioner’s opinion, should be brought to the Minister’s attention. (2) Whenever required by the Minister, the Garda Commissioner shall submit to the Minister a report on any matters connected with the policing or security of the State or the performance of the Commissioner’s other functions that may be specified in the requirement.
fly_agaric wrote: » I know not of what I speak, but he was working in the EU for 6 years. Maybe using a foreign driving licence at this stage? Would that add to hassle for a guard of trying to do anything more about it than give a warning? Not deflecting here, I don't know how they deal with minor offenses of people on foreign licences.
Muahahaha wrote: » Possible but I know Commissioners have a driver available to them so he wouldnt have been driving around Brussels himself. Its a moot point though because the penalty is 3 points and a 60 euro fine for driving while talking on a phone. Irrespective of what license he is on the fine should still issue to the address on his drivers license. Its not like having driving license from another EU country suddenly exonerates you from being issued a fine. There are very limited reasons as to why Hogan was offered Garda discretion here. Theres wider issues here too. What the point in the RSA spending taxpayers money campaigning for an end to phone use if the Gardai arent going to even enforce the law when people are caught? Or is it the case that they are still being choosy as to who they will apply the law to like they were during the penalty points scandal of 2014? Drew Harris should be more upfront about these things and telling us why Hogan was offered discretion here because plenty of people are not given the same chance and they get the fine and the 3 penalty points.