Wanderer78 wrote: » Goes well beyond just our public transport system!
blanch152 wrote: » Yes, indeed, they set cross-border infrastructure back by decades.
smurgen wrote: Yep hundreds of suicides linked to it too. Just under 500 it's estimated.
smurgen wrote: FG and FF austerity has done many many many multiples of damage to Irish rail over the last decade than and terrorist organisation could ever dream of!
JohnnyFlash wrote: » The IRA weren’t beyond removing rail infrastructure. Usually with Semtex and a telephone warning.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » They were a terrorist paramilitary organisation who didn’t recognise the Irish State, Francie. Subversive makes them sound like a bunch of avant garde artists.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » And it seems some of their elected reps are still trying to break the State. Few lads did a bit of buckleppin down in Clifden..... major consequences. Lad exults in havin broken the State..... all brushed over. Strange...... very strange...
FrancieBrady wrote: » The IRA were a subversive organisation intent on disrupting the normal operation of the two states. Nice comparison! I wouldn't have gone that far myself.
McMurphy wrote: Did MLMD say anything about chicken nuggets, chips or nachos having any miraculous anti viral antibodies?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Ireland's answer to Michael Portillo...gawd help us all. Can't wait for the episodes that chart FG/FF's starvation of investment in the railways here and the shortsighted ripping up of infrastructure and capitulation to the road haulage lobby.
smurgen wrote: » Nahhh hating FG is an all inclusive sport. I have to say this made me lol.https://twitter.com/ChloeORourke_/status/1300441566067204097?s=19
JohnnyFlash wrote: » It’s fantastic to see how angry the FG party makes some people. Men (always men) grasping at straws, tilting at windmills, and trying to find outrage in even the most innocuous of stories. Annoying the right type of people as well.
dundalkfc10 wrote: » Id be more concerned about the fact she said pubs are a danger to people's lives. What evidence has she of this? I can go to numerous pubs in town tomorrow and get a pint and not be asked to buy food (same rules as people who are eating) How many cases are linked to these pubs? All "closed"
McMurphy wrote: » Did MLMD say anything about chicken nuggets, chips or nachos having any miraculous anti viral antibodies? .
McMurphy wrote: » Did MLMD say anything about chicken nuggets, chips or nachos having any miraculous anti viral antibodies? If FFG and SF are both saying close the pubs, but FFG are saying keep the ones open that sell a bit of grub (as if the grub has some kind of miraculous medicinal chemistry) can remain open, then the tweet above has a bit of merit.
Jinglejangle69 wrote: » Heard Mary Lou agreeing that pubs should stay closed. Did you hear that yourself?
markodaly wrote: » Grand, then you disagree with SF policy. Just saying!
dundalkfc10 wrote: » Open sure half them are open this weeks serving takeaways from down the street
markodaly wrote: » You didn't answer my question. Do you think we should open pubs or keep them closed?
dundalkfc10 wrote: » Id be more concerned about the fact she said pubs are a danger to people's lives. What evidence has she of this? I can go to numerous pubs in town tomorrow and get a pint and not be asked to buy food (same rules as people who are eating) How many cases are linked to these pubs? All closed
markodaly wrote: » Well its fairly stupid to post up a tweet critical of a government minster's view on pub closures when the leader of the opposition and SF, MLMD also agrees with the minister's views. What is your view on the matter? Open pubs, or keep them closed?
