nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

Beasty

No spitting, biting, gouging or uncivility allowed

First thread here

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

eire4

extra gravy wrote: »

God this is pathetic. "Greatest country on earth" my ass.

More like banana republic at this point.

Batmannn

Joe Biden does not have dementia
Fact

Sierra Oscar

Bloomberg - JPMorgan Says Investors Should Prepare for Rising Odds of Trump Win

Spelling out what we already know - i.e. polls have significantly tightened.

Democrats are right to be alarmed.

Based on past research, there could be a shift of five to 10 points in polls from Democrats to Republicans if the perception of protests turns from peaceful to violent, he said. People giving inaccurate answers could artificially skew polls in favor of Biden by 5%-6%, he added.

dwayneshintzy

This is pure Grampa Simpson;

https://twitter.com/RexChapman/status/1300918107976986624?s=08

joeguevara

It might be old news now that if you go to antifa.com site you are redirected to Joe Bidens home page. It has happened a few times over the last month but most recently yesterday.

But it’s the perfect time to rehash the joke

Trump tried to hack the antifa.com website to make it forbidden, but the gobsh1te fcucked up and made it For Biden.

As at 20 seconds ago the antifa.com site points to Biden homepage.

ThunbergsAreGo

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Lincoln project new ad should hit home with all parents.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83YL2jg-PPQ

Pretty much the same can be said for our own government

namloc1980

Embarrassing. Trump has a brainfart and unable to answer the question. For a very stable genius, he doesn't know very much does he. And yet the Trumpists believe he's brilliant and will obliterate his opponent in the debates.

.

ohnonotgmail

namloc1980 wrote: »

Embarrassing. Trump has a brainfart and unable to answer the question. For a very stable genius, he doesn't know very much does he. And yet the Trumpists believe he's brilliant and will obliterate his opponent in the debates.

.

not only did he not condemn rittenhouse he didnt even mention him despite talking about people coming from out of town with the intention of causing trouble. Barr is garbage and can expect to be wearing an orange jumpsuit alongside Trump.

LessOutragePlz

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

not only did he not condemn rittenhouse he didnt even mention him despite talking about people coming from out of town with the intention of causing trouble. Barr is garbage and can expect to be wearing an orange jumpsuit alongside Trump.

There's no actions to condemn if he like many others believe he acted in self defense.

He didn't come from out of town with the sole intention of causing trouble unlike the violent mob that burned down buildings and businesses he was working as a community lifeguard in Kenosha that day.

namloc1980

Trump campaign sticking by his BS claim that a planeload of domestic terrorists flew into Washington DC for the RNC. Zero envidence, just lies.

.

namloc1980

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

There's no actions to condemn if he like many others believe he acted in self defense.

He didn't come from out of town with the sole intention of causing trouble unlike the violent mob that burned down buildings and businesses he was working as a community lifeguard in Kenosha that day.

Law enforcement have charged Rittenhouse with first degree intentional homicide. Is Trump not supporting law enforcement? Bit weird for the law and order president not to support law enforcement.

LessOutragePlz

namloc1980 wrote: »

Law enforcement have charged Rittenhouse with first degree intentional homicide. Is Trump not supporting law enforcement? Bit weird for the law and order president not to support law enforcement.

Being charged with a crime does not make you guilty of a crime.

How is not supporting law enforcement he sent in the national guard to help the local police in Kenosha and the police chief was grateful for their help.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXNs9neY4bU

Igotadose

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Being charged with a crime does not make you guilty of a crime.

How is not supporting law enforcement he sent in the national guard to help the local police in Kenosha and the police chief was grateful for their help.

Law enforcement charged Rittenhouse with a crime. So, does the #IMPOTUS support law enforcement?

Penn

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

There's no actions to condemn if he like many others believe he acted in self defense.

He didn't come from out of town with the sole intention of causing trouble unlike the violent mob that burned down buildings and businesses he was working as a community lifeguard in Kenosha that day.

What part of his job as a community lifeguard required him to bring a gun with him?

I mean, if he was just in Kenosha just to do his job as a community lifeguard, why bring a gun? Why carry a gun outside when it's illegal for him to do so as he's under 18?

threeball

ThunbergsAreGo wrote: »

Pretty much the same can be said for our own government

I didn't realise the virus was rampant in Ireland. I better go back in to lockdown and check up on those daily death figures.....oh wait.

namloc1980

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Being charged with a crime does not make you guilty of a crime.

How is not supporting law enforcement he sent in the national guard to help the local police in Kenosha and the police chief was grateful for their help.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXNs9neY4bU

"Lock her up" "Lock her up". And Hillary was never even charged with anything!!

He has a lot to say about alleged rioters arriving in planes when a. they haven't been charged either and b. don't even exist! But not a peep about a guy charged with intentional homicide. Clearly he's undermining law enforcement in that case.

LessOutragePlz

Penn wrote: »

What part of his job as a community lifeguard required him to bring a gun with him?

I mean, if he was just in Kenosha just to do his job as a community lifeguard, why bring a gun? Why carry a gun outside when it's illegal for him to do so as he's under 18?

He you even read anything about what happened?

He didn't bring the gun with him he got it from a friend that was living in Kenosha. As a local business asked for help to defend his business so him and his friend offered their help.

ThunbergsAreGo

threeball wrote: »

I didn't realise the virus was rampant in Ireland. I better go back in to lockdown and check up on those daily death figures.....oh wait.

Government are sending kids to school with the virus in the community with little actual safety measures due to chronic under investment in schools

ohnonotgmail

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

There's no actions to condemn if he like many others believe he acted in self defense.

He didn't come from out of town with the sole intention of causing trouble unlike the violent mob that burned down buildings and businesses he was working as a community lifeguard in Kenosha that day.

how do you know that? on what basis are you claiming that?

LessOutragePlz

Igotadose wrote: »

Law enforcement charged Rittenhouse with a crime. So, does the #IMPOTUS support law enforcement?

Should the president come out in support of every single crime that is being prosecuted in America?

ELM327

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Should the president come out in support of every single crime that is being prosecuted in America?

I imagine that's what the left want, once the burning looting mob are not being prosecuted for their crimes.

LessOutragePlz

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

how do you know that? on what basis are you claiming that?

Because he was in Kenosha to work not to cause trouble.

Have you got any evidence to prove otherwise?

Hande hoche!

Igotadose wrote: »

Law enforcement charged Rittenhouse with a crime. So, does the #IMPOTUS support law enforcement?

The timing of that Trump supported being shot will blunt the impact of Rittenhouse.

Leroy42

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

He you even read anything about what happened?

He didn't bring the gun with him he got it from a friend that was living in Kenosha. As a local business asked for help to defend his business so him and his friend offered their help.

He brought a gun into the situation didn't he? Exactly where he got it from is for another investigation.

A local business specifically reached out to this kid to come and protect their property? Are you sure, or is it that a general plea went out and this guy saw that as an opportunity to carry out his vigilantism?

But he, knowingly, put himself in the frame and brought a loaded gun with him. Therefore he was going there with the intention of shooting, if he needed to. Premeditated.

ohnonotgmail

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Because he was in Kenosha to work not to cause trouble.

Have you got any evidence to prove otherwise?

he traveled to a different state with a firearm. a firearm he was not allowed to possess. what work was he doing that required a firearm? why did he attend a protest with a firearm? he had no business being there. he was a 17 year old cop fantasist itching to own the libs. and he will spend the rest of his life in prison as a result.

Carfacemandog

namloc1980 wrote: »

"Lock her up" "Lock her up". And Hillary was never even charged with anything!!

He has a lot to say about alleged rioters arriving in planes when a. they haven't been charged either and b. don't even exist! But not a peep about a guy charged with intentional homicide. Clearly he's undermining law enforcement in that case.

Laws and law enforcement mean little to Trump and his supporters beyond being something to virtue signal their loyalties over. Their deafening silence on Trump meekly allowing Russia to order the death of US troops (which has seen military support shift away from Trump and to Biden) is another example of this.

Their adament defense of Rittenhouse, who also likes to best up girls, killing two people for which he has been charged for murder is just the latest in a long, long line of clear and intentional hypocrisies on their end. Using the logic they did for George Floyd, Rittenhouse would have deserved to be killed there and then with no need for sympathy. Instead, because he subscribes to the same cult as them, they are feigning offense at any such suggestion and demanding a fair trial with no public opinions given until its conclusion.

And before one of them chimes in with their highly predictable response - both Rittenhouse and Floyd deserved trial, even though both are in video committing their crimes. One for using a fake $20 bill, the other for killing two people in the streets and shooting a third. But not by the standards of the cult of Trump. For them all that matters is whose side the person is on, which means more than the application of the rule of law or any civil rights like that of a fair trial.

It's all very telling of the world they want to live in.

Leroy42

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Because he was in Kenosha to work not to cause trouble.

Have you got any evidence to prove otherwise?

To work? Jebus, you have totally lost it?

Whi hired him for this 'work'. What were his responsibilities, who did he answer to? If he was working for someone, who was it and are they then not ultimately responsible to the killings and of course for his legal issues?

gmisk

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Because he was in Kenosha to work not to cause trouble.

Have you got any evidence to prove otherwise?

To work....what was his job exactly? And did it involve being underage carrying an assault rifle...does he need it to lifeguard?

Penn

Leroy42 wrote: »

He brought a gun into the situation didn't he? Exactly where he got it from is for another investigation.

A local business specifically reached out to this kid to come and protect their property? Are you sure, or is it that a general plea went out and this guy saw that as an opportunity to carry out his vigilantism?

But he, knowingly, put himself in the frame and brought a loaded gun with him. Therefore he was going there with the intention of shooting, if he needed to. Premeditated.

Plus as stated, it was illegal for him to carry a gun outside. He was breaking the law. He did not have a permit and was underage.

He was breaking the law. And that was before he shot and killed two people.

Carfacemandog

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Because he was in Kenosha to work not to cause trouble.

Have you got any evidence to prove otherwise?

Who was his employer? It's the first I'm hearing of this.