GalwayyGirl wrote: » Has anyone had any success in drawing down while one or both applicants are in receipt of the subsidy? We have wasted countless weeks now applying to additional banks that initially said there will be no issue with drawdown as they are dealing with subsidy receipients on a "case-by-case basis". All of the banks which have come back to us are requiring proof of non-receipt of the subsidy prior to drawdown (despite what they previously stated). Only one of us are in receipt of the subsidy payment (no threat to job security). We are have strong incomes, good savings and no debt. Despite this, we don't satisfy whatever critera they are using to assess our application on a 'case-by-case' basis. Any help would really be appreciated. Thank you.
Janey100 wrote: » No but our broker has told us he has had some successes in order to get us to continue the process when we didnt know if we should bother and get our Hope's up, but whether this is true or not I will find out in 3 weeks when we look to drawdown 🀷*♀️ Have you contracts signed? Are you in hospitality as he thinks this is the "case by case" bases
brisan wrote: » How people can still believe this is beyond me
GalwayyGirl wrote: » We are sale agreed but haven't signed contracts yet. I work in the legal sector.
Londyn Hallowed Duet wrote: » Because it’s fact for many people. How can people now believe that there are people in receipt of the subsidy that are totally secure and there companies haven’t a chance in hell of going under.
Cushtie wrote: » If a company is in receipt of the EWSS this payment will not appear on the employees payslip.
Janey100 wrote: » Makes no sense then you should be fine especially that only one of you are on it,why would they tell you to go through the process it will be fine and then not follow through!Waste of your time! Also if it's not appearing on the next payslip what to stop a company writing a letter and lying that they are off it,what's a piece of typed up words worth!
michellie wrote: » I'm on the wage subsidy scheme too(coming off it next week) my job is absolutely under no threat.
brisan wrote: » Maybe not YOUR particular job,but by applying for TWSS your employer has admitted that his business is suffering a downturn. They have stated that they cannot afford to pay all their staff full wages. The bank knows this and will treat all employees of the business the same. Cemeteries are full of people who though they could not be done without. At the best of times NO ONES job is safe ,even more so now.
michellie wrote: » I work in the NCT brisan, I'm sure we will be ok.
brisan wrote: » They have stated that they cannot afford to pay all their staff full wages..
sparkle109 wrote: » Permanent tsb have told us no drawdown until off Covid subsidy at least a month quote="Kh1993;114480379"]Not arguing what’s right or wrong etc, but are any banks actually processing applications for drawdown under the subsidy on the ‘case by case basis’ like they said they would, or a full blown no? I know permanent tsb and Ulster bank have both said in the media that they are, but that in actual practice they are giving 100% no’s to subsidy applicants.
spiralout wrote: » The new EWSS won't appear on your payslip. How will banks know if you are on it or not?
spiralout wrote: » I thought they would have some way of finding out.
The_Conductor wrote: » Banks are specifically requesting letters from Personnel Officers stating that you are in permanent employment, at what salary and whether or not this is subvented by any government schemes.
Londyn Hallowed Duet wrote: » Do banks actually follow up on these letters? Sure anyone with access to the headed paper of their company could do up a letter.
awec wrote: » That would be fraud. Not only would your bank take serious issue with this, but your employer would not be impressed either to find you forging letters.
The_Conductor wrote: » I'm not aware of any lenders processing any (at all) drawdowns for recipients of pay/salary under the wage subsidy scheme.
Dav010 wrote: » Absolute BS. Where are you getting this from? When an employer applied for TWSS, all that was being stated was that income/orders had dropped due to Covid. Most businesses closed in March, most are down at least 25 to 30% of income. When something like that happens in normal times, like the loss of a big customer, it is prudent for an employer to lay-off unneeded staff. Employers would have done this during Covid, in an effort to keep people in employment and off the live register, the TWSS scheme was quickly introduced. Availing of it is not a statement you cannot afford to pay wages, it did however keep hundreds of thousands of employees in a job who would otherwise have been laid off as there was no work for them to do .
Londyn Hallowed Duet wrote: » It may well be and I’m not condoning it but you can be sure people would still chance it if there is only a very slim chance of being caught and they are driven mad with frustration by the banks acting the bollocks over this.
brisan wrote: » So you consider a bank acting the bollocks by refusing to lend money to people who may not be in a position to pay it back Fair enough