nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

Beasty

No spitting, biting, gouging or uncivility allowed

First thread here

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Igotadose

Kidchameleon wrote: »

Referring to Rosenbaum? He's a pedophile with a history of violence. He was filmed actively seeking to be shot moments before the incident. He's not my idea of a hero, no.

*Disclaimer* He did not deserve to be shot IMHO.

Anthony Huber. Was he a hero for attempting to disarm Rittenhouse? Would you have had his courage at that time?

Overheal

Kidchameleon wrote: »

Referring to Rosenbaum? He's a pedophile with a history of violence. He was filmed actively seeking to be shot moments before the incident. He's not my idea of a hero, no.

*Disclaimer* He did not deserve to be shot IMHO.

Is a woman beater your idea of a hero though?

Carfacemandog

Overheal wrote: »

Is a woman beater your idea of a hero though?

Woman beater, and co defendent with Jeffrey Epstein in a child rape case.

Kidchameleon

Igotadose wrote: »

Anthony Huber. Was he a hero for attempting to disarm Rittenhouse? Would you have had his courage at that time?

He too was a dirtbag. Not a hero IMHO. Most likly looking for trouble.

Overheal

Carfacemandog wrote: »

Woman beater, and co defendent with Jeffrey Epstein in a child rape case.

Well I meant Rittenhouse but yes I often forget Trump is a woman beater.

relax carry on

Jesus Christ, the insanity of citizens of a supposed first world democratic society walking around armed with guns and killing people on the street is now considered behaviour worthy of defense by posters who support Trump's never ending con.

A child decided to arm himself, take to the streets and shoot strangers. In what way is this normal behaviour worthy of defense?

[Deleted User]

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

I mean it would be impossible to fact check if Trump has Made America Great Again because it is subjective.

Plenty think he hasn't but some think he has or at least believe he's done enough to warrant another 4 years as president.

If they did use fact checkers then who would fact check the fact checkers? because I'm sure that will be the first thing out of Trump's mouth if the plan is even considered.

In other words just as I said.

Timberrrrrrrr

relax carry on wrote: »

Jesus Christ, the insanity of citizens of a supposed first world democratic society walking around armed with guns and killing people on the street is now considered behaviour worthy of defense by posters who support Trump's never ending con.

A child decided to arm himself, take to the streets and shoot strangers. In what way is this normal behaviour worthy of defense?

Because in that basket case country it is normal, This time a child armed himself and killed strangers on the street, next time it will be a child who arms himself and walks into a school and kills his classmates. It barely makes the news and it's forgotten about two days later.

Igotadose

Kidchameleon wrote: »

He too was a dirtbag. Not a hero IMHO. Most likly looking for trouble.

He tackled Rittenhouse after Rittenhouse murdered someone and was being chased. Risked and lost his life. What would you have done in his situation?

francois

relax carry on wrote: »

In what way is this normal behaviour worthy of defense?

It obviously isn't. Just a bunch of alt ****e wind up merchants with multiple accounts. Pointless engaging with them.

LessOutragePlz

relax carry on wrote: »

Jesus Christ, the insanity of citizens of a supposed first world democratic society walking around armed with guns and killing people on the street is now considered behaviour worthy of defense by posters who support Trump's never ending con.

A child decided to arm himself, take to the streets and shoot strangers. In what way is this normal behaviour worthy of defense?

You see you've bought into the narrative that's being pushed by some groups at the moment.

Himself and a friend were helping to protect a local business, in no way did he "take to the streets to shoot strangers" but keep believing that false narrative.

"Later in the day, they received information about a call for help from a local business owner, whose downtown Kenosha auto dealership was largely destroyed by mob violence. The business owner needed help to protect what he had left of his life's work, including two nearby mechanic's shops. Kyle and a friend armed themselves with rifles due to the deadly violence gripping Kenosha and many other American cities, and headed to the business premises."

Full statement here:

https://twitter.com/infolibnews/status/1299545139187249153?s=20

Danzy

Whatever about the right or wrong of Kyle's shooting or his character.

We can all surely agree that the world is a nicer and safer place for kids and women now that those 2 pricks are dead.

Professor Moriarty

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

You see you've bought into the narrative that's being pushed by some groups at the moment.

Himself and a friend were helping to protect a local business, in no way did he "take to the streets to shoot strangers" but keep believing that false narrative.

"Later in the day, they received information about a call for help from a local business owner, whose downtown Kenosha auto dealership was largely destroyed by mob violence. The business owner needed help to protect what he had left of his life's work, including two nearby mechanic's shops. Kyle and a friend armed themselves with rifles due to the deadly violence gripping Kenosha and many other American cities, and headed to the business premises."

Full statement here:

https://twitter.com/infolibnews/status/1299545139187249153?s=20

Menahan is a far right nutter. WTAF is a 17 year doing defending some randomer's business with a semi automatic rifle?

Take a look in the focking mirror.

Carfacemandog

Danzy wrote: »

Whatever about the right or wrong of Kyle's shooting or his character.

We can all surely agree that the world is a nicer and safer place for kids and women now that those 2 pricks are dead.

By that twisted logic, wouldn't the world be a better place if someone killed the murderer that is Kyle Rittenhouse?

Its a pathetic race to the bottom once you get into the line of thinking where you delight in the deaths of others.

Igotadose

Danzy wrote: »

Whatever about the right or wrong of Kyle's shooting or his character.

We can all surely agree that the world is a nicer and safer place for kids and women now that those 2 pricks are dead.

Nope. Sorry can't agree. As I asked Kidc what would you do in the same situation as Anthony Huber in Kenosha?

LessOutragePlz

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

Menahan is a far right nutter. WTAF is a 17 year doing defending some randomer's business with a semi automatic rifle?

Take a look in the focking mirror.

The statement came from his lawyer that Menahan fella just retweeted it.

He was doing his duty as a good American citizen in helping protect a fellow citizen's business and livelihood that was under threat from a violent mob that had already burned down one of his businesses.

Professor Moriarty

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

The statement came from his lawyer that Menahan fella just retweeted it.

He was doing his duty as a good American citizen in helping protect a fellow citizen's business and livelihood that was under threat from a violent mob that had already burned down one of his businesses.

He was 17 with a semi automatic rifle. You're talking rubbish.

Timberrrrrrrr

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

The statement came from his lawyer that Menahan fella just retweeted it.

He was doing his duty as a good American citizen in helping protect a fellow citizen's business and livelihood that was under threat from a violent mob that had already burned down one of his businesses.

But weren't the protesters also his fellow citizens executing their constitutional right to protest?

Carfacemandog

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

The statement came from his lawyer that Menahan fella just retweeted it.

He was doing his duty as a good American citizen in helping protect a fellow citizen's business and livelihood that was under threat from a violent mob that had already burned down one of his businesses.

This then begs the question that if the gun did not cross state lines, which gun owner illegally gave it to him and what can be done to stop this reoccurring as it is clear how easy it is to get a gun in the hands of a child with violent tendencies to kill with.

And it doesn't appear to address the issue of his illegally holding a firearm openly at his age, a which is another question not only he but the police who thanked him for doing so should ha e to answer for.

LessOutragePlz

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

But weren't the protesters also his fellow citizens executing their constitutional right to protest?

Not the ones that were burning down businesses, rioting and looting.

Can you point me to the part of the constitution that gives citizens the right to burn down businesses and engage in looting and rioting?

Timberrrrrrrr

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Not the ones that were burning down businesses, rioting and looting.

Can you point me to the part of the constitution that gives citizens the right to burn down businesses and engage in looting and rioting?

I cant

Can you show me the part that says it's OK to shoot unarmed people dead in cold blood?

Carfacemandog

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

But weren't the protesters also his fellow citizens executing their constitutional right to protest?

One of the surest facts about Trump and his supporters is that they believe constitutional rights do not apply to those with opposing political opinions to theirs.

If I don't add the words Colin Kaepernick (along with the countless protests that have gone on peacefully this summer) and their opposition to these also, one of them will also predictably try to hide behind 'peaceful' part of the first amendment. Edit - I see this point has been proven just two posts up.

LessOutragePlz

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

He was 17 with a semi automatic rifle. You're talking rubbish.

He was 17 year old with a gun protecting a business that was under threat of being burned down.

Context is everything and you seem keen to not give the events proper context.

Why is that?

Timberrrrrrrr

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

He was 17 year old with a gun protecting a business that was under threat of being burned down.

Context is everything and you seem keen to not give the events proper context.

Why is that?

Can you provide evidence for this claim please?

MadYaker

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

He was 17 year old with a gun protecting a business that was under threat of being burned down.

Context is everything and you seem keen to not give the events proper context.

Why is that?

Its hilarious to watch people just toe the line endlessly

Dyr

Carfacemandog wrote: »

One of the surest facts about Trump and his supporters is that they believe constitutional rights do not apply to those with opposing political opinions to theirs.

If I don't add the words Colin Kaepernick (along with the countless protests that have gone on peacefully this summer) and their opposition to these also, one of them will also predictably try to hide behind 'peaceful' part of the first amendment.

I'm going to hazard a guess that smashing cars, assault and forming lynch mobs to chase people dont generally fall under constitutionally guaranteed rights.

None of the people the kid shot were protesting, one was chasing him down, one was smacking him in the head, and the last was pointing a gun at him.

But do continue about protest...

relax carry on

Danzy wrote: »

Whatever about the right or wrong of Kyle's shooting or his character.

We can all surely agree that the world is a nicer and safer place for kids and women now that those 2 pricks are dead.

What the hell is wrong with you. Do you have any respect for the legal protections afforded all citizens of functional first world democratic societies? The child decided to be judge, jury and executioner of strangers. He did not afford his fellow citizens any rights. It was not his job, his role, his function in society to do what he did. This is not normal and if you find yourself applauding the outcome, you really need to ask yourself, what happened in your life to get you to this point. This is not a game. This is real life. There is no coming back from this. The child ended the lives of two human beings, injured another and has destroyed his own life.

Cody montana

Bambi wrote: »

I'm going to hazard a guess that smashing cars, assault and forming lynch mobs to chase people dont generally fall under constitutionally guaranteed rights.

None of the people the kid shot were protesting, one was chasing him down, one was smacking him in the head, and the last was pointing a gun at him.

But do continue about protest...

He's a murderer.

Dyr

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Can you provide evidence for this claim please?

Great idea, throw some evidence up that the two dead felons were protesting when the kid offed them. Same with guy who had his arm shot off while pointing a gun at the kid

Carfacemandog

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

He was 17 year old with a gun protecting a business that was under threat of being burned down.

Context is everything and you seem keen to not give the events proper context.

Why is that?

The context of this situation is that an underage child was given an extremely dangerous weapon that he had no legal right to be open carrying, yet police had no issue with him doing so as they had chosen sides and deemed him to be on theirs, which enabled him to murder people on the streets and just walk by riot squads to go home right after doing so.

The context of this situation shows not only all the laws that were broken and were openly allowed to be broken by police, but also (yet again) shows the need for stricter gun controls in the United States, and the need for whomever supplied the weapon to Rittenhouse to also be charged an an accessory, or similar.