nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

Beasty

No spitting, biting, gouging or uncivility allowed

First thread here

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

[Deleted User]

extra gravy wrote: »

What's this photo got to do with the birther theory? Are you saying that an American born citizen cannot look like this? And why are you bringing Hillary up again ffs it's not 2016. You guys seem to have some sort of weird obsession with her.

Also a quick reverse image search for that image indicated that it was from 2016 and spread by Bill O'Reilly. So in this specific instance had absolutely nothing to do with Clinton. So it's more random to post it...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3678209/Bill-O-Reilly-reveals-pictures-young-Obama-Islamic-wedding-claims-emotional-attachment-Muslim-world-hurt-USA.html

Kidchameleon

extra gravy wrote: »

What's this photo got to do with the birther theory? Are you saying that an American born citizen cannot look like this? And why are you bringing Hillary up again ffs it's not 2016. You guys seem to have some sort of weird obsession with her.

Fair enough. I have deleted the post in question. I just wanted to make a point that many many people, not just the Trumps, questioned Obama's origins.

salmocab

one world order wrote: »

As we get closer to the election, those working in the background will try everything to stop him getting re-elected. Crazy thing is, those trying to destroy the country think they can topple a democratically elected government through violence and destruction. Things are going to become very interesting in the next few months. But God is in control and Trump will get re-elected no matter what tricks they try between now and November 3rd.

To take this to it’s logical conclusion if Biden wins then he’s who your god wanted elected or else he doesn’t have the power you think which would be a poor show for a god.

[Deleted User]

Kidchameleon wrote: »

Fair enough. I have deleted the post in question. I just wanted to make a point that many many people, not just the Trumps, questioned Obama's origins.

Trump was doing so well into Obama's presidency and actively claimed to have evidence he wasn't American. In general, he had a pretty bizarre obsession with Obama that continues to this day. That's neither healthy or presidential.

Kidchameleon

Deleted User wrote: »

Also a quick reverse image search for that image indicated that it was from 2016 and spread by Bill O'Reilly. So in this specific instance had absolutely nothing to do with Clinton. So it's more random to post it...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3678209/Bill-O-Reilly-reveals-pictures-young-Obama-Islamic-wedding-claims-emotional-attachment-Muslim-world-hurt-USA.html

Sorry, it was this image and yes, it appears it was Hillary that spread it. I understand that Hillary has nothing to do with the current election (not at the moment anyhow). My point was to defend the Trumps as "birther's".

Barack+Obama.jpg

Clinton accused of smear over Obama picture

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/clinton-accused-of-smear-over-obama-picture-787288.html

1990sman

namloc1980 wrote: »

Thanks mod.....oh.

you have to be moderated to be a decent human being?

says alot.

namloc1980

Kidchameleon wrote: »

My point was to defend the Trumps as "birther's".

But the Trump's were birther conspiracists. Why are you trying to defend them? Bizarre.

namloc1980

1990sman wrote: »

you have to be moderated to be a decent human being?

says alot.

Nah. You brought up "blasphemy" which is meaningless really. No beliefs have an entitlement to be respected. You seem to be disrespecting my beliefs that a supernatural man in the sky is a ridiculous notion.

Timberrrrrrrr

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Also a quick reverse image search for that image indicated that it was from 2016 and spread by Bill O'Reilly. So in this specific instance had absolutely nothing to do with Clinton. So it's more random to post it...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3678209/Bill-O-Reilly-reveals-pictures-young-Obama-Islamic-wedding-claims-emotional-attachment-Muslim-world-hurt-USA.html

I think we all know the reason it was posted.

salmocab

namloc1980 wrote: »

But the Trump's were birther conspiracists. Why are you trying to defend them? Bizarre.

Because if someone else was doing it then magically a Trump doing it is okay. You appear to be arguing with logic which is really a waste of your time around here.

1990sman

namloc1980 wrote: »

Nah. You brought up "blasphemy" which is meaningless really. No beliefs have an entitlement to be respected. You seem to be disrespecting my beliefs that a supernatural man in the sky is a ridiculous notion.

ok u are a special butterfly. have a nice day.

(and yes a magic man in the sky is ridiculous, and has nothing to do with the true concept of God)

Professor Moriarty

Kidchameleon wrote: »

Sorry, it was this image and yes, it appears it was Hillary that spread it. I understand that Hillary has nothing to do with the current election (not at the moment anyhow). My point was to defend the Trumps as "birther's".

Clinton accused of smear over Obama picture

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/clinton-accused-of-smear-over-obama-picture-787288.html

This is the Trump/Biden thread. Let's focus on Trump's malicious lies about people's citizenship.

[Deleted User]

namloc1980 wrote: »

Nah. You brought up "blasphemy" which is meaningless really. No beliefs have an entitlement to be respected. You seem to be disrespecting my beliefs that a supernatural man in the sky is a ridiculous notion.

I'm finding it much weirder that they're not offended by what one world order is spreading tbh.

namloc1980

1990sman wrote: »

ok u are a special butterfly. have a nice day.

Thanks for your contribution.

Igotadose

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

This is the Trump/Biden thread. Let's focus on Trump's malicious lies about people's citizenship.

Let's talk about Trump's declining ratings, the fact that he couldn't outdraw Biden during his unenthusiastic speech, and all the good dirt on his Falwell buddies. That's current. HRC/BHO are 2016. Teapublicans really need to get with current events. Heck, any opinions out there on the #IMPOTUS pandemic handling?

[Deleted User]

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

This is the Trump/Biden thread. Let's focus on Trump's malicious lies about people's citizenship.

I think chameleon is annoyed cause it's been pointed out that melania was actively spreading the conspiracy with her husband.

Overheal

ThunbergsAreGo wrote: »

Is the constant recording of people and the then showing of these recordings on social media legal? Some sort of invasion of privacy law (though Europe seems more comprehensive with this).

Maybe no law was broken, if it was a 7ft msn screaming **** off in the face of a 5ft woman, would you see the same? — not nice, but no laws broken let them continue without admonishment?

As perfectly legal as any of a million videos of protesting/rioting. Really now.

jamule

Igotadose wrote: »

Let's talk about Trump's declining ratings, the fact that he couldn't outdraw Biden during his unenthusiastic speech, and all the good dirt on his Falwell buddies. That's current. HRC/BHO are 2016. Teapublicans really need to get with current events. Heck, any opinions out there on the #IMPOTUS pandemic handling?

your not allowed talk about that, its not fair and lazy (according to pete)

1990sman

Igotadose wrote: »

Let's talk about Trump's declining ratings, the fact that he couldn't outdraw Biden during his unenthusiastic speech, and all the good dirt on his Falwell buddies. That's current. HRC/BHO are 2016. Teapublicans really need to get with current events. Heck, any opinions out there on the #IMPOTUS pandemic handling?

Trump is clearly the man for the job, his use of superlatives is inspiring

ohnonotgmail

1990sman wrote: »

Trump is clearly the man for the job, his use of superlatives is inspiring

his use of superlatives is definitely inspiring to his base but that is a very low bar. Unfortunately he never seems to use them correctly or appropriately.

extra gravy

1990sman wrote: »

Trump is clearly the man for the job, his use of superlatives is inspiring

TREMENDOUS contribution to the thread.

Fuzzyduzzy

Just overheard two twenty somethings chatting in a cafe. Girl A says she's looking forward to November when Trump goes and all this police brutality and racism stops. Girl B agrees, saying that the world will be a safer place with less wars.

It got me thinking, is there a sizeable amount of people out there who believe that racism and police brutality did not exist in the US before Trump? Also, he did not enter any wars unlike his predecessors. Again, I'm not supporting either side but it's just interesting that people thinking life will be rosy with Joe Biden as president.

namloc1980

Fuzzyduzzy wrote: »

Just overheard two twenty somethings chatting in a cafe. Girl A says she's looking forward to November when Trump goes and all this police brutality and racism stops. Girl B agrees, saying that the world will be a safer place with less wars.

I'm going to hazard a guess that this didn't happen.

Timberrrrrrrr

Fuzzyduzzy wrote: »

Just overheard two twenty somethings chatting in a cafe. Girl A says she's looking forward to November when Trump goes and all this police brutality and racism stops. Girl B agrees, saying that the world will be a safer place with less wars.

It got me thinking, is there a sizeable amount of people out there who believe that racism and police brutality did not exist in the US before Trump? Also, he did not enter any wars unlike his predecessors. Again, I'm not supporting either side but it's just interesting that people thinking life will be rosy with Joe Biden as president.

Was it a hipster cafe?

Cody montana

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Was it a hipster cafe?

Sure Jacob.

Overheal

Noteworthy though that civil unrest has been a vast problem in trumps America and he’s demonstrably been twisting the knife with his rhetoric and lack of unifying message. So I can see why any plebs would associate his tenure with the current state of the nation.

Kidchameleon

Fuzzyduzzy wrote: »

Just overheard two twenty somethings chatting in a cafe. Girl A says she's looking forward to November when Trump goes and all this police brutality and racism stops. Girl B agrees, saying that the world will be a safer place with less wars.

It got me thinking, is there a sizeable amount of people out there who believe that racism and police brutality did not exist in the US before Trump? Also, he did not enter any wars unlike his predecessors. Again, I'm not supporting either side but it's just interesting that people thinking life will be rosy with Joe Biden as president.

He's no pacifist of course. He cant be. But if he manages to go the whole second term without starting anything he will be the first Peace President in a long, long time. This is probably the main reason why the globalists and hence the globalist controlled media hate on him so much.

hotmail.com

Fuzzyduzzy wrote: »

Just overheard two twenty somethings chatting in a cafe. Girl A says she's looking forward to November when Trump goes and all this police brutality and racism stops. Girl B agrees, saying that the world will be a safer place with less wars.

It got me thinking, is there a sizeable amount of people out there who believe that racism and police brutality did not exist in the US before Trump? Also, he did not enter any wars unlike his predecessors. Again, I'm not supporting either side but it's just interesting that people thinking life will be rosy with Joe Biden as president.

Irish people haven't got a clue about America, outside of New York or Florida. It's embarrassing.

Tell me how

hotmail.com wrote: »

Irish people haven't got a clue about America, outside of New York or Florida. It's embarrassing.

Even us Irish people living in America?

What do you know about it that I don't?

Leroy42

Kidchameleon wrote: »

He's no pacifist of course. He cant be. But if he manages to go the whole second term without starting anything he will be the first Peace President in a long, long time. This is probably the main reason why the globalists and hence the globalist controlled media hate on him so much.

What war did Obama start?