Tazzimus wrote: » One pic of the front of the car and then loads of close ups of random bits.. Also didn't realised a flat bottomed steering wheel was a selling point.
colm_mcm wrote: » Look at the Daimler he has for sale though
frozenfrozen wrote: » https://www.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/audi/25757392 anyone think this is weird the date is so far in the past on the dash alongside duct tape on the reg? If they were just reusing old pictures I'm sure it has more than 260k km on it now if the pics are a year old. Date could just be wrong on the dash
CIP4 wrote: » Not sure do many on here follow Car throttle but a while ago they bought a 2003 A4 with over 540K miles on it. Just looked through the MOT history on it, its plain outrageous the only thing its every failed for is blown bulbs and one worn brake hose fair enough there was other advisories but no major fails for anything big. It just goes to show what cars can do mileage wise and plenty or people in Ireland think 100K miles is high mileage. Personally I'd think of anything with 250-300k km on it as being high mileage and on the way out then you have that Audi going around with 800K km on it, it's mad. Reg is WP03LNFhttps://www.check-mot.service.gov.uk
punisher5112 wrote: » That could be down to owner been anul about keeping her right though.... Is great to see though.
colm_mcm wrote: » Good preventive maintenance and not using the MOT to highlight items to service is probably the reason.
Toyotafanboi wrote: » That was the Octavia. A drop in the ocean compared to those but i had a run in with a Qashqai there the other week, 378k kms, drove perfectly. Modern cars in general take mileage really well IMO if you do any bit of looking after them.
Toyotafanboi wrote: » Yeah, Mrs FB's previous MK7 Golf would have been similar, when it got traded in re PCP'd it was just shy of 3 years of age with 140k kms on it. Still had it's original tyres on the back axle with around 4mm tread depth left, still on original pads and discs all round, original wipers etc. Could have passed for 40k no bother. Still had a little equity too :pac:.
Toyotafanboi wrote: » A question for all the Toyota enthusiasts Is the starter the same on a 1.4 d4d 2007 Corolla E13 saloon and a 1.4 d4d 2006 Corolla E12 hatchback? I'm hoping so because I've just bough one used from ebay from a 06 to go on the 07. I reckon it's the same, using Toyodiy without a chassis number suggests it's the same but have a fear now that the block connector could be different. Long shot, anyone :pac:
PsychoPete wrote: » Supposed to be the same across the Corolla, Auris and Yaris, you'll find them in the first gen Mini as well
colm_mcm wrote: » They’re the same.
L-M wrote: » Jaysus. The most I ever saw on a tyres was 87kms on a Passat with origional back tyre (other side was changed due to a puncture)
User1998 wrote: » There’s always mixed opinions on Dublin Diagnostic, he came to look at a car I was selling and he done a fairly thorough inspection but others claim he is a con man
User1998 wrote: » Yeah he’d definitely be handy to use to save you a wasted journey if you had to travel far, I’d trust him to inspect a car after the inspection he done on mine. Had a really good look around the car for accident damage and done a good long test drive and a diagnostic. He does a full UK and Irish history check as well included in the price. I saw on Donedeal you can book a pre purchase inspection now as well with a company called Auto Guru, €99 for an inspection that doesn’t even include a test drive? Or a more thorough one for €150
CIP4 wrote: » I said this earlier on but the Octavia I bought recently has 134K km on original rear tyres 3mm left on them. Changing them soon though as they are just gone noisy obviously never rotated. But grip wise they are actually fine they are Michelin Energy. It's the most I have ever seen on a car tyre.