nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

Beasty

No spitting, biting, gouging or uncivility allowed

First thread here

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

ohnonotgmail

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

Post pics or it didn't happen.

a link to them was posted yesterday. all fine enough if you like women with bolted on plastic breasts. post #4064 if you are interested.

Professor Moriarty

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

every time he gives a speech behind a lecturn he holds on to it for dear life.

And looks extremely dodgy going down a stairs.

baaba maal

hotmail.com wrote: »

From a global point of view, it's a good thing for America not to over react to these events.

By "over react", do you mean "react"?

Professor Moriarty

Gruffalox wrote: »

Oh I see. That is the level I am dealing with.

For what it is worth Melania is gorgeous, and seems sweet. She generally looks fantastic. She has come in for constant marauding by the left leaning side of things for everything from her clothes, past nudes (priestly horror again), her Christmas decorations to her Rose Garden renovations. As someone who would never vote for someone like Trump - or Biden either, shudders!!- I have thought Melania has great taste and an aesthetic eye and did a grand old job on the previously kitschy rose garden. The persistent deranged mauling of her has been revealing.

Post pics or it didn't happen.

mcmoustache

Gruffalox wrote: »

Oh I see. That is the level I am dealing with.

For what it is worth Melania is gorgeous, and seems sweet. She generally looks fantastic. She has come in for constant marauding by the left leaning side of things for everything from her clothes, past nudes (priestly horror again), her Christmas decorations to her Rose Garden renovations. As someone who would never vote for someone like Trump - or Biden either, shudders!!- I have thought Melania has great taste and an aesthetic eye and did a grand old job on the previously kitschy rose garden. The persistent deranged mauling of her has been revealing.

She was spreading the same racist birther shíte as her husband. She's trash. Expensive trash but still trash.

ohnonotgmail

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

Mental note, make sure no lecterns at debates.

every time he gives a speech behind a lecturn he holds on to it for dear life.

Professor Moriarty

namloc1980 wrote: »

It was certainly very low energy from Trump and an extremely long, boring speech full of lies. By the end he was leaning over and gripping onto the lectern a lot. Not a great look.

Mental note, make sure no lecterns at debates.

ohnonotgmail

namloc1980 wrote: »

It was certainly very low energy from Trump and an extremely long, boring speech full of lies. By the end he was leaning over and gripping onto the lectern a lot. Not a great look.

the adderall was wearing off

namloc1980

Quin_Dub wrote: »

You seem to be in a definite minority there.

The general consensus was that it was a low energy delivery that went on far too long.

It was certainly very low energy from Trump and an extremely long, boring speech full of lies. By the end he was leaning over and gripping onto the lectern a lot. Not a great look.

Cody montana

namloc1980 wrote: »

Easily impressed aren't we. Basically Trump's & the RNC message was: things are really terrible in many parts of the country and I couldn't do anything to solve those problems in the last 4 years but give me 4 more years anyway because none of the problems are my fault. But if you elect Biden all those things will get worse (even though they've happened under my watch). It was basically 1 hour and 10 minutes of that circular nonsense.

“Let me fix the mess I created”

Gruffalux

dwayneshintzy wrote: »

So it's your view that social justice protests since as far back as (at least) 1967 are unjustified?

What do you think of Martin Luther King Jr. and the civil rights movement, Gruffalox?

Democratic Mayor of Seattle Jennifer Durkan described the occupation of CHAZ/CHOP as a potential Summer of Love. If she had to clean up the humungous mess after the fools had pillaged whole areas or tend to the rape and gunshot victims of her loving freedom fighters she might have said otherwise

Gruffalux

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

yeah, right

I believe her

You saying you don't? Tut tut tut

Quin_Dub

Gerry Hatrick wrote: »

I'm going to say it. It was an impressive speech. Americana will like that compared to Bidens low energy approach.

You seem to be in a definite minority there.

The general consensus was that it was a low energy delivery that went on far too long.

Fox News on Trumps Speech -

"Surprised by the lack of Fireworks"
"Surprising Flat"
"Lacking Excitement"
"Went on far too long"
"I have to say in his delivery, I thought the president—who we have seen really turn on a crowd—was surprisingly flat and didn’t seem to have the bite that he usually does have in his speeches"
“The speech was very, very long. I don’t know that any speech that is an hour and ten minutes uninterrupted by anything visual can work very well.”

Fox News on Bidens Speech -

"Joe Biden hit a Home run"
"Enormously Effective Speech"
"He Knocked it out of the Park"
"Blew a hole in the narrative of him being a candidate in decline"
“I thought Biden had the moment of his life, and he ought to feel really good about that.”
"It was so authentic to who Biden is, and … it caught the mood of the country, which is unity, steady, competence, ‘We can rise above this’."

namloc1980

Gerry Hatrick wrote: »

I'm going to say it. It was an impressive speech. Americana will like that compared to Bidens low energy approach.

Easily impressed aren't we. Basically Trump's & the RNC message was: things are really terrible in many parts of the country and I couldn't do anything to solve those problems in the last 4 years but give me 4 more years anyway because none of the problems are my fault. But if you elect Biden all those things will get worse (even though they've happened under my watch). It was basically 1 hour and 10 minutes of that circular nonsense.

ohnonotgmail

Gruffalox wrote: »

Oh I see. That is the level I am dealing with.

For what it is worth Melania is gorgeous, and seems sweet. She generally looks fantastic. She has come in for constant marauding by the left leaning side of things for everything from her clothes, past nudes (priestly horror again), her Christmas decorations to her Rose Garden renovations. As someone who would never vote for someone like Trump - or Biden either, shudders!!- I have thought Melania has great taste and an aesthetic eye and did a grand old job on the previously kitschy rose garden. The persistent deranged mauling of her has been revealing.

yeah, right

Gruffalux

jamule wrote: »

it was a woman? wow. next your going to tell me it was a foreigner, Trump would never hire a foreigner to be his wife.

Oh I see. That is the level I am dealing with.

For what it is worth Melania is gorgeous, and seems sweet. She generally looks fantastic. She has come in for constant marauding by the left leaning side of things for everything from her clothes, past nudes (priestly horror again), her Christmas decorations to her Rose Garden renovations. As someone who would never vote for someone like Trump - or Biden either, shudders!!- I have thought Melania has great taste and an aesthetic eye and did a grand old job on the previously kitschy rose garden. The persistent deranged mauling of her has been revealing.

jamule

Gruffalox wrote: »

Did not see speech. Will not be seeing speech. Don't know who the person you refer to as a robot dressed like porn star is or what they were wearing.
BUT I am presuming it is a WOMAN you are refering to - and sounding very much like a disparaging priest while refering to her. In other areas you are probably a feminist ally who says I believe her, but when it comes to a political divide you will call out a woman on the wrong team as bad as any slack-jawed redneck misogynist would.

it was a woman? wow. next your going to tell me it was a foreigner, Trump would never hire a foreigner to be his wife.

extra gravy

namloc1980 wrote: »

Socially distant??? You're having some laugh in fairness.

.

Then wipes his hand on her arm. Disgusting.

namloc1980

Kidchameleon wrote: »

Team Trump accept the nomination together at the RNC. A massive (socially distanced) crowd cheered them on with chants of "four more years, four more years!" Melania wore green, a symbol of hope & the Presidents speech was full of hope for the future.

Socially distant??? You're having some laugh in fairness.

.

extra gravy

Fat Lives Matter wrote: »

The same WHO who defends China? C'mon man!

The same WHO that employs educated experienced scientists as opposed to the anti science moron in the White House.

Gruffalux

jamule wrote: »

why did he have a robot dressed as a porn star with him, v odd choice. the fireworks were amazing.

Did not see speech. Will not be seeing speech. Don't know who the person you refer to as a robot dressed like porn star is or what they were wearing.
BUT I am presuming it is a WOMAN you are refering to - and sounding very much like a disparaging priest while refering to her. In other areas you are probably a feminist ally who says I believe her, but when it comes to a political divide you will call out a woman on the wrong team as bad as any slack-jawed redneck misogynist would.

duploelabs

Kidchameleon wrote: »

Unlike Joe's acceptance speech which could easily have been (nobody else in the room etc.) Trumps acceptance speech was attended by a large crowd, had fireworks displays, musical performances. I encourage you to watch the video and see for yourself.

As you've been corrected before...
No one else in the room, apart from the camera crew and dozens of reporters.

Parroting what Rush say isn't doing you any favours, best fact check first

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/aug/24/rush-limbaugh/joe-biden-gave-his-convention-speech-live-rush-lim/

[Deleted User]

Kidchameleon wrote: »

Unlike Joe's acceptance speech which could easily have been (nobody else in the room etc.) Trumps acceptance speech was attended by a large crowd, had fireworks displays, musical performances. I encourage you to watch the video and see for yourself.

It wasn't socially distanced based on these images, what you've described is incredibly inappropriate behaviour during a global pandemic. It's not a time to be celebrating.

https://twitter.com/Yamiche/status/1299118395615477761?s=19

extra gravy

Kidchameleon wrote: »

Unlike Joe's acceptance speech which could easily have been (nobody else in the room etc.) Trumps acceptance speech was attended by a large crowd, had fireworks displays, musical performances. I encourage you to watch the video and see for yourself.

Only simpletons would be impressed by fireworks and musical performances. All show and no substance as usual

dwayneshintzy

Gruffalox wrote: »

The people on the streets rioting in America at the moment are violent anti-intellectual low lifes. They have no class. They are hysterical and criminal fools. Defacing public property. Invading shops. Forcing people via mob rule to raise their fists to support "BLM". Pillaging and looting under the guise of a "rights" movement. And the Democrats have been soft on them. Right from the Summer of Love crap. Pictures from public plazas in the US now look disgraceful. These people are within the Democrats electorate. If Republican allied mobs were doing what the supposed left are doing now people would be rightly horrified.

Spend 7 minutes listening to this guy speak on it. I am with him. These rioters and their global supporters are classless purposeless idiots.

https://twitter.com/mrctv/status/1297707698788728832?s=19

So it's your view that social justice protests since as far back as (at least) 1967 are unjustified?

What do you think of Martin Luther King Jr. and the civil rights movement, Gruffalox?

jamule

Kidchameleon wrote: »

Unlike Joe's acceptance speech which could easily have been (nobody else in the room etc.) Trumps acceptance speech was attended by a large crowd, had fireworks displays, musical performances. I encourage you to watch the video and see for yourself.

have you proof it was live? It was v low key, he was like an old dottery man who forgot the last 4 yrs. I think he may have issues. why did he have a robot dressed as a porn star with him, v odd choice. the fireworks were amazing.

Gruffalux

Injuryprone wrote: »

These people on the streets rioting are not Biden supporters, rather they're Trump haters. Some might say what's the difference, but I think there is a difference.

The people on the streets rioting in America at the moment are violent anti-intellectual low lifes. They have no class. They are hysterical and criminal fools. Defacing public property. Invading shops. Forcing people via mob rule to raise their fists to support "BLM". Pillaging and looting under the guise of a "rights" movement. And the Democrats have been soft on them. Right from the Summer of Love crap. Pictures from public plazas in the US now look disgraceful. These people are within the Democrats electorate. If Republican allied mobs were doing what the supposed left are doing now people would be rightly horrified.

Spend 7 minutes listening to this guy speak on it. I am with him. These rioters and their global supporters are classless purposeless idiots.

https://twitter.com/mrctv/status/1297707698788728832?s=19

Gerry Hatrick

Kidchameleon wrote: »

Unlike Joe's acceptance speech which could easily have been (nobody else in the room etc.) Trumps acceptance speech was attended by a large crowd, had fireworks displays, musical performances. I encourage you to watch the video and see for yourself.

I'm going to say it. It was an impressive speech. Americana will like that compared to Bidens low energy approach.

Injuryprone

I really don't get this narrative that if you elect Joe Biden, you'll get all this violence and rioting in every city in the country. Surely the exact opposite is the case.

Since the minute he's been elected, DT has done nothing but sow the seeds of division and hate. He has done nothing to unite people or show any compassion for people of differing views to try and bring them along with his vision of America. This disenfranchisement has culminated in his opponents taking to the streets which has resulted in violence.

Another 4 years of this policy and the riots on the streets of the US is only going to get worse, not better.

These people on the streets rioting are not Biden supporters, rather they're Trump haters. Some might say what's the difference, but I think there is a difference.

Actually, to be fair to him, the fact that DT is managing to deflect the responsibility for the riots on his opponent is no mean feat and shows a real talent IMO. The fact that the democrat leadership is so weak and disjointed also helps I suppose

Kidchameleon

jamule wrote: »

was it prerecorded?

Unlike Joe's acceptance speech which could easily have been (nobody else in the room etc.) Trumps acceptance speech was attended by a large crowd, had fireworks displays, musical performances. I encourage you to watch the video and see for yourself.