Infowars reporter Millie Weaver ‘arrested’ mid-premiere of her whistleblowing investigation into ‘shadow government’ Investigative reporter Millie Weaver and her husband have reportedly been arrested at the same time her documentary on the US “shadow government” was being screened on YouTube, sending Conservative Twitter into theory overdrive. Weaver’s “arrest” at the couple’s home – which has yet to be confirmed by authorities – was initially reported by Infowars on Friday, shortly after the YouTube premiere of her documentary film “ShadowGate.” The film purports to expose the secrets of the massive ‘Deep State’ intelligence apparatus manipulating politics within the US and beyond its borders, based on the reports of two private intelligence whistleblowers. Video of the couple’s apparent arrest, shot by Weaver herself, was posted to Twitter by her Infowars colleague Adan Salazar, opening on Weaver asking in disbelief if “a grand jury indicted [her].”
King Mob wrote: » Yes. You also keep ignoring points and questions to go down this random tangent to defend this info Wars employee and her Qanon adjacent bull**** movie.
The key takeaway from these first paragraphs is how the search query results were exported from the NSA database to users who were not authorized to see the material. The FBI contractors were conducting searches and then removing, or ‘exporting’, the results. Later on, the FBI said all of the exported material was deleted.
McHardcore wrote: » As long as they arent harming anyone they should be allowed to say what they want.
enno99 wrote: » As for new york times reporter who also worked at buzz feed I explained that earlier
King Mob wrote: » Again you're expecting an answer to a random off topic point while you've not addressed any of the questions put to you. But to answer your question here, I don't think the two situations are comparable. Alex Jones and his Info Wars are exclusively for the purpose of creating and spreading propaganda and bull****. Even if they acted completely perfectly and without flaw, that's still their purpose.So any journalist who works for them is by definition ok with that. Therefore by definition has no journalistic integrity. And conversely Alex Jones and the higher ups recognize that they will produce bull**** for them, which is why they'd hire those reporters. On the other hand, in the case of an actual news organisation like ABC, they are an actual news organisation with standards and oversight. Do they always meet those standards? No. Do they never do shady stuff? Again no.(And this is assuming that you are accurate in your accusations, which I don't really trust given your habit of misrepresenting things.) I'm not sure how ABC being bad relates to a New York Times reporter lying though... Now I've answered your question in full. I expect you'll continue to ignore any question put to you.
enno99 wrote: » So would you agree by your standards that the companies and all who work for them are scumbags and highly paid ones at that I mean they tried to destroy a kids life and covered up for a peadophile
King Mob wrote: » The only one here calling people names and accusing people of being ok with the covering up of child abuse is you...
enno99 wrote: » The Sceptic Hyenas arrive and the name calling begins
enno99 wrote: » Which you both seem to be ok with
Dohnjoe wrote: » I didn't see/read your ABC thing/view, no comment on it, so don't start attributing anything to me. I was referring to media in general using 2 examples.
enno99 wrote: » No according to the ABC reporter LOL Which you both seem to be ok with
enno99 wrote: » For the record I dont believe everything from Alex Jones /Qanon or other sites like many CT here I look at all information the truth usually lies somewhere in between As you guys said there's some truth in there
King Mob wrote: » .So because according to him, ABC covered up child abuse, .
Dohnjoe wrote: » I didn't mention ABC. Tip: people can't read your mind If you hate these outlets, cool, but you're here promoting conspiracies from some of the worst sources possible, so I'll take that view with a sack of salt
King Mob wrote: » Just a reminder why enno is trying to go down this tangent. I pointed to a quote from a reporter from the New York Times that states that Qanon believes and pushers are promoting and sharing this documentary. In response he posted links and rants to what he is claiming is the failures of the mainstream media. So because according to him, ABC covered up child abuse, a reporter from the New York Times is obviously lying about Qanon promoting this bull**** documentary. I'm still not sure of his stance on Qanon on whether it's a viable theory or complete bull****. I had assumed most conspiracy theorists realised that Info Wars and those attached were complete bull**** artists. But enno had proven that wrong. Maybe I'm also wrong in assuming that most conspiracy theorists her know Qanon is nonsense too.
enno99 wrote: » I see your giving ABC a pass
enno99 wrote: » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hehsQlHxt2M So he says he wasnt involved in the film
Dohnjoe wrote: » My take-away is: don't watch trashy news like CNN or Fox. And certainly stay away from ultra trashy YT conspiracy videos by ex-models on Infowars that get insto-banned by major platforms for being hot garbage and borderline hate speech
enno99 wrote: » So he says he wasnt involved in the film
enno99 wrote: » And the examples I gave you ?
Dohnjoe wrote: » Fox news is pretty bad but I don't know if I'd call them straight up scumbags..
enno99 wrote: » Is it ok to be scumbags if your a "news outlet" ?
Dohnjoe wrote: » CNN is a news outlet, like Fox news, etc. These news channels all sit at various points on a spectrum of media quality, some are higher, more accountable, more credible than others You are referring to a conspiracy video made by an Infowars pundit on Youtube, something that sits at the worst end of that spectrum (is quite possibly right off it). If you have difficulty discerning the difference then you may be the target audience for that type of Youtube conspiracy video.
enno99 wrote: » You mean like CNN and the rest of the "normal media" as you like call them
King Mob wrote: » I've already pointed out that you lied and said they weren't involved.
Dohnjoe wrote: » In the case of these types of conspiracy videos: they'll often use few facts or pieces of info and then carefully frame, spin and distort that to fit a particular narrative, always leaving out key context, and relying heavily on tenuous links. It's highly dishonest stuff. Once you know the tricks and techniques it's fairly easy to produce anything, at this stage I could make a killer e.g. 9/11 conspiracy video, but unfortunately I have some sort of conscience.
The Washington Post on Friday agreed to settle a monster $250 million lawsuit filed by Covington Catholic High School student Nick Sandmann over its botched coverage of his 2019 encounter with a Native American elder.
It’s the teen’s second win in a whopping $800 million defamation battle against a number of news outlets including the Washington Post, CNN, ABC, CBS, The Guardian, The Hill and NBC.
Dohnjoe wrote: » In the case of these types of conspiracy videos: they'll often use few facts or pieces of info and then carefully frame, spin and distort that to fit a particular narrative, always leaving out key context, and relying heavily on tenuous links. It's highly dishonest stuff.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/867a9f20e705add43a3ada2e4f4480cc.svg)
