mick087 wrote: » Our Taoiseach is elected by its citizens as a member of goverment. The commission and the President are selected and never elected by its citizens.
caveat emptor wrote: » So would it be ethical to take a court case having been relieved of his position based on an ethical issue? Not even your wan who fell off a swing did that. Is there no honour among politicians these days?
is_that_so wrote: » We vote for the EP who vote for the Commissioners. Here we vote for TDs who choose a Taoiseach. The only position we vote for directly is President.
ec18 wrote: » I don't see the point of this. You don't have a problem with ministers being appointed by the government, but you have a problem with the government nominating a commissioner that is approved by the European parliament and serves a fixed term where they are either renominated by a national government or a new commissioner is proposed. It's not like he's in a job for life.
mick087 wrote: » Yes i have suggested this many times for a way the citizens could be elect a Commissioner. A elected MEP could stand for election as commissioner Maybe each state have n election to decide who will be that states EU commissioner.
Jizique wrote: » Will your vote be organized on a pan-Euro basis or on a national basis?
jm08 wrote: » They have the date as Thur. 28 Aug 2020 when in fact it will be Thur. 27th. Poor attention to detail!
I don't think they will let trees get in the way.
Allinall wrote: » I heard he got it off the council, and only pays €30 a week in rent.
jm08 wrote: » So basically you are against everything and for nothing. Have you yet told us how the EU Commission should be formed?
jm08 wrote: » I'm not sure why he mentioned Pharma as there is already a WTO agreement where tariffs on 7,000 pharma are eliminated. The US & EU are signed up to this WTO agreement (unless the fact that the US is withdrawing from WTO). Tariffs are not usually the main issue. Its regulatory approval by the EU that makes it more difficult. Hogan wasn't the EU Trade Commissioner for that. He inherited it. It might have been a bit kinder to farming interests if he was the Trade Commissioner then. Anyway, its not going to come into being as Brazil is not abiding by the Paris Climate Agreement which was a requirement.https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2019-2024/hogan/announcements/extracts-commissioner-phil-hogans-remarks-european-american-chamber-commerce-event-transatlantic_en
is_that_so wrote: » It's a spoof! Nicely done but he's still there!
caveat emptor wrote: » He was talking about removing Pharma tariffs for US companies importing to EU. That would mean a lot of US Pharma companies could move production back to US. There's one reason we might want him gone.
Mercosur, there's another.
mick087 wrote: » Yes it does seem that way that's for sure. Sneer comments arrogance trying to telling you to go away trying find a political party to associate you with to run you down. I think many would be happy if this was called you must agree boards ie
golfball37 wrote: » That’s what debate has been reduced to sadly in Ireland. Any anti EU sentiment sees you reduced to a level they can look down on.
mick087 wrote: » Again you mean refuse to do the nodding dog routine to your opinion. Democracy for citizens really terrifies you. But what i don't understand is why? Allowing Citizens to vote for its Commissioners will allow for a more democratic accountable EU.
First Up wrote: » I see you haven't yet bothered to learn about how representative democracy works. You really should; all sorts of things will suddenly start to make sense.
Ta ceist agam wrote: » WOW! DID NOT EXPECT THIS!!
smurgen wrote: » From the horse's mouth , this is unbelievable.https://twitter.com/paddycosgrave/status/1298537457621913600?s=19
caveat emptor wrote: » You would say it's entirely different. Let's see what's similar.They both broke covid restrictions. They both scrambled for loopholes in the restrictions. They both issued public apologies They both subsequently got caught in their lies. The both embarrassed their government They are both crucial in drafting legislation (EU for Phil, UK for DC) They both gave people an excuse to flout the regulations. They both put weight behind the mantra of one rule for us, one for you.
ec18 wrote: » Citizens gave them power based on lies and misinformation. Is that really a fair election then? you want to elect judges? Would not accept that there are some posts that require a skill set and competencies that is outside the popularity context of an election?
mick087 wrote: But i do understand it and no its not complex one bit. Its the unaccountable unelected selected elite who believe they know whats best for its citizens. Change make them accountable to its citizens.