take everything wrote: » He was indignant in explaining this. Sh1thead will keep his job I'd say though.
Joe_ Public wrote: » Cant see it myself but he's claiming it says you dont have to keep isolating and is insisting thats the same as not restricting movement. So it's not an out for him anyway. There's actually no ambiguity there, as much as he is trying to create it.
If you are a close contact of a confirmed case you have to restrict your movements for 14 days even if your test comes back negative. This is because it can take up to 14 days for the virus to show up in your system after you have been exposed to it.
thelad95 wrote: » Amazing now that he's trying to find ways to justify his decisions. I highly doubt he consulted the citizens information website and made his decision based on that info. He was simply doing as he pleased and is now retrospectively trying to justify his actions. Regardless of whether he's actually broken the law, the way he acted was certainly not in the spirit of the regulations.
IAMAMORON wrote: » What a witch hunt.
An Ri rua wrote: » Nobody has mentioned Áine the witch yet. Relax.
Smegging hell wrote: » I see the interview has put a line under matters. https://twitter.com/newschambers/status/1298317427395239936
jm08 wrote: » So, basically, the problem is that 1) Citizens Info and HSE give out conflicting information. 2) Michael Martin must have followed the Citizens Info site when he came back from the EU Summit in Brussels as he didn't isolate and claimed to have had a Covid test which was clear. 3) Hogan's breach is now 1 day by playing golf and staying in Adare. Have I missed anything?
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » Was the medical intervention getting his brass neck polished?
ForestFire wrote: » 1) No they don't, unless you belive phils spin, it's quite clear. 2) don't actually know about this, but he was not at a golf shindig while people were dying without loved ones, he was running the country... Small difference 3) no he broke it much sooner going to leinster housr But if he was one bit honest from the start, it may not have got this far
mr_edge_to_you wrote: » He got tested on on the 5th Aug and that was negative. So that gave him licence to go galavanting around the country with no regard to the rules and regulations. He could’ve picked up the virus on any of social events he was at between then and Clifden.
An Ri rua wrote: » Will be interesting to see if Heather Humphreys weighs in on this. No Minister stands by while their Department is being attacked. He's really put his foot in it with this relentless Maxwell Smart style capitulation. Next, it will be the shoeshine boy at the airport who told him to go all in. Gobsh1te.
murpho999 wrote: » I think this is the page he's referring to. In the bottom section about restricting movements if you live with somebody with Covid symptoms. It says that if their test result comes back negative then you do no not have to restrict your movements. That scenario does not apply to him Above is at the top of the page and that does apply to him. He hasn't got a leg to stand on.
hotmail.com wrote: » Hand written notes he says in Kildare that he was getting. He's a liar.
SweetCaliber wrote: » Big Phil cant read it seems:https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/b4020-travelling-to-ireland-from-a-country-that-is-not-on-the-covid-19-travel-advice-list/
Allinall wrote: » What makes you say that? How do you know he didn’t have hand written notes?
Sonic the Shaghog wrote: » If Ursula doesn't sack this pig, Phil is just proving the "unaccountable EU" angle of the Brexit campaign ffs
[Deleted User] wrote: » The FG apologist rears his head once more. Deny, deflect, distract.