mynamejeff wrote: » like this guy?https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/former-sinn-féin-member-apologises-for-anonymous-social-media-abuse-1.4327497
mynamejeff wrote: » bombing babies and bands aside intimidating witnesses into silence is scumbaggery . murdering gardai and innocent people is scumbaggery allowing drug dealers to operate in an area destroying family's as long as thy pay tax is scumbaggery smuggling fuel cigarettes and booze is scumbaggery SF have all the criteria of a organised crime gang asserting that the SF IRA that exists today has any legitimate connection with the SF that existed during the war of independence and civil war is a lie , claiming that the current SF is the oldest political party in Ireland has been done in previous threads is also a lie. here is the link in the SF IRA website asking people to join the "online army"https://www.sinnfein.ie/contents/26753 Shinner bots have been publicly asked to stop abusing people on line . google the world for further information . you know this you post on all SF threads as do the same few profiles
end of the road wrote: » it wasn't sf that engaged in all you mention, that was the IRA.sinn fein is the oldest political party and modern sf are the same as the old sf.
mynamejeff wrote: » https://www.sinnfein.ie/contents/26753 recruitment link for shnnerbots
maccored wrote: » put up or shut up. Im not interested in trying to run after you to get an answer. Posting a link to a page where SF are trying to increase their social media and online presence doesnt make 'shnnerbots'. Paranoia springs to mind. Either that or you havent heard of this 'new' thing called the social media.
FrancieBrady wrote: » A transparent and open campaign to recruit online activists v a secret (Leo got rumbled) campaign to deploy anonymous posters pretending they are neutral (the definition of a bot) But Jeff has a prob with the first one. :D
mynamejeff wrote: » I have a problem with cowardly bullies and people who try to intimidate others remember what the threads is about
mynamejeff wrote: » you see that right there is a LIE this lie has been debunked in a thread on this site already , im sure you were party to that thread too SF that exists now was founded 17 January 1970 Why do you believe that ? because it says so on the SF website ?
mynamejeff wrote: » lol what do you want a dead shinnerbot at your feet ? its not a new term or phenomena , theres your proof follow the link
piplip87 wrote: » Are ye Shinnerbots screaming media bias ? Jaysus FF/FG are getting some serious heat over this golf gate craic. Although I haven't heard one claim of media bias ?
smurgen wrote: » You'd have FG so. Have a look at what they done to Maurice McCabe.
end of the road wrote: » nothing was debunked and there are no lies. a party disbanding and reforming again with the same goals and wishes is ultimately the same party because it can trace it's herritage back to it's original founding. they are a myth so your link is not proof of anything bar sf are encouraging the spreading of their message on social media via supporters and community activists. a complete non-issue, completely open and transparent.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Anonymous online accounts...cowardly and can be used to bully. I have a problem with a political party secretly trying to set them up...do you?
mynamejeff wrote: » again like this guyhttps://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/former-sinn-féin-member-apologises-for-anonymous-social-media-abuse-1.4327497
jm08 wrote: » So, Bloody Sunday and Dublin-Monaghan bombings etc. were ethnic cleanings carried out by sociopathic mass murderers?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Do you see 'former' there in big letters? All party's have issues with members going rogue like this. Please let's not bore everyone again linking to them.
mynamejeff wrote: » Former after the fact , lot of Former in SFhttps://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/sinn-féin-loses-13-public-representatives-over-bullying-claims-1.3381372
FrancieBrady wrote: » Ah no...not rogue members, every party has them. I was talking about systemic organised anonymous campaigns. Maybe they are among us already?https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/varadkar-suggested-creating-anonymous-accounts-online-to-make-positive-comments-on-news-37275799.html
blanch152 wrote: » The only systemic organised anonymous campaign is the SFOS. We know it exists, we don’t know the members.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Anytime you see a SF post online...that's a product of it I'd imagine. Loads of it going on. You see something pro FG...for example from somebody who says they are a supporter of another party, that's in dubious territory, because the purpose of 'anonymous' accounts is to hide what they really are.
Higgins5473 wrote: » why do you bother with these idiots?
end of the road wrote: » defending oneself against oppression is not ethnic cleansing.
end of the road wrote: » it wasn't sf that engaged in all you mention, that was the IRA. sinn fein is the oldest political party and modern sf are the same as the old sf.
markodaly wrote: » Kingsmill is defending yourself now?
Bowie wrote: » Bloody Sunday is legitimate democracy in action now is it? We could play this game all day.
markodaly wrote: » Why are you following me around boards Bowie? My question was to EOTR. The PIRA and SF clearly engaged in sectarian actions. Nice whataboutery though.
Bowie wrote: » I'm posting as I like. You are asking questions (answering none) in an open forum. Maybe pm if you want to chat privately with others? If you post in hobbies or farming I'll not be along.
