Bowie wrote: » There's a bigger picture here. Do you think Hogan is fighting for the average Irish worker or vested interests that will enrich both himself and his pals? Im not saying that's the situation but look at him and the party he's spat from. FG and Hogan aren't fighting for the average working tax payer IMO. You can see by how what they do makes problems worse but they keep on doing what they do. I expect he'll follow the FG ideology of looking after business the bigger the better. If the average working tax oayer can glean something off it its a happy coincidence.
2lazytogetup wrote: » anyone guessing what time we will have a resignation from phil hogan at. im purely speculating that he will resign. im guessing 5pm today it will be announced on the news that he has gone. pity padraig flynn isnt around to take his place.
ec18 wrote: » the average working tax payer mostly works for these businesses
titan18 wrote: » I understand what you're saying, and as someone who's in general pro restrictions for Covid, and has done best to stick to them (as nonsense as some of them are/were imo), I don't see why the government shouldn't be putting everything into place so that this is all above board and clearly documented what's expected of people, and that laws can be put in place, before they go on to get their TV time. For it to be taking 3/4 days for hotels to get the proper updates that they need is ridiculous imo. Its impossible to go off what Martin is saying in his conferences. He waffles and doesnt go into detail. I remember back with the roadmap stuff in April/May that when Varadkar announced it, there was stuff on the gov.ie website that same day with the full detail.
Psychiatric Patrick wrote: » You still have yet to explain how Hogan is benefit in the position.
ec18 wrote: » Completely true, however having a trade commissioner that understands the history and complexities of the border would be an advantage for ireland over say the trade commissioner being from southern europe
ChikiChiki wrote: » Having looked at the tweets with EU responses. Off with a finger wagging The matter is closed from their end. He is not going to resign unless there are any further serious revelations.
Phoebas wrote: » I agree with what ec18 said about it: I don't think anyone really believes that having an Irish Commissioner confers no benefit at all.
Bowie wrote: » There's a bigger picture here. Do you think Hogan is fighting for the average Irish worker or vested interests that will enrich both himself and his pals? Im not saying that's the situation but look at him and the party he's spat from. FG and Hogan aren't fighting for the average working tax payer IMO. You can tell by how what they do makes problems worse but they keep on doing what they do. I expect he'll follow the FG ideology of looking after business the bigger the better. If the average working tax payer can glean something off it its a happy coincidence.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Explain the benefits please, what were the benefits to Irish farmers when as Agri Commissioner he signed the deal for cheap beef with Brazil.
Psychiatric Patrick wrote: » One of us is misunderstanding the other. It looks to me like you are saying that hotels and other business do not need to act on new or alter restrictions until the bureaucracy makes it all "official". I'm saying that these people don't seem to understand that the virus will spread more in the meantime.
Bowie wrote: » Including the ones that are shell companies or playing three card monte with international tax law sure.
Phoebas wrote: » Can't you read the post you quoted?
Mrcaramelchoc wrote: » I for one want him gone.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » I did read it. If you can't or won't answer my question that's fine. Personally I think alot of the defence of Hogan here is party allegiance and nothing more.
caveat emptor wrote: » This is mad. You can watch back. A UK press person is not letting it drop. Do the UK want him gone for some reason?https://audiovisual.ec.europa.eu/en/ebs/live/1?lg=OR
Psychiatric Patrick wrote: » Can you re-post them? Or just explain again? I cannot find them.
Phoebas wrote: » Ha. I'm not playing that game. :rolleyes:
titan18 wrote: » Ya, it's hard to act on what the level of detail Martin gives imo. I'd agree virus will spread more which is why I think the government should be doing the best to provide all the detail that's needed as fast as possible so that everything is above board and businesses can adjust to it. No way do I see it should be taking 3/4 days for it.
McMurphy wrote: » This. Wasn't Phil contemplating jumping ship to the WTO a few weeks ago?
Deleted User wrote: » Why? In his eyes he’s done nothing wrong. He only stopped briefly in Kildare enroute to a vital shindig with golfing and political buddy’s, getting a telling off by Gardai for using his mobile phone whilst driving. All in a days work. Brass neck are feeling jealous of his ballsiness.
Hawthorn Tree wrote: » If you think Phil only dropped into Kildare to pick up a few papers, you are deluded.
ec18 wrote: » no he doesn't, he went to a golf dinner. It no way impacts how good he is at his job or his competence in doing it. This is getting ridiculous people resigning for mistakes that aren't related to their portfolios........everyone needs to get a grip it was stupid to do but no one in the country is fully obeying the restrictions.