jm08 wrote: » Why should I quit saying that Fine Gael or Fianna Fail were somehow better in the civil war. In fact, Fine Gael were much worse than the British in Northern Ireland, executing their former comrades the way they did.
mynamejeff wrote: » its 2020 now .
RandomViewer wrote: » In a lot of cases it was a choice of Army or prison,
mynamejeff wrote: » which of those party's were in existence during the civil war again ?
Truthvader wrote: » Firstly not every soldier who kills someone is damaged and sociopathic. Only where killings amount to murder. Though it does seem that many soldiers suffer afterwards even after justifiable or self defence killings. Whatever you think about that it is 1000 miles away from tricking an innocent young eejit of a soldier who not only poses no threat to you but has demonstrated affection and attraction to you. As stated maybe I am too old but it seems particularly calculating sick and depraved for a women to do such a thing
mynamejeff wrote: » your getting a bit wound up jm aren't you ? also quit trying to link the current SF IRA scumbags to the war of independence and the civil war , the shinnerbots here have already tried and failed at that miserably a few times
maccored wrote: » are you enjoying your talks with these imaginary 'shinnerbots'?
maccored wrote: » you were the one who said that in your initial answer, not me.
blanch152 wrote: » And having terrorists or criminal thugs in the membership of any political party makes them shadowy. Yet you deny that there is anything shadowy about SF. You are trying to have it both ways as usual, and when your posts are logically dissected to expose the contradictions and incoherence, you cry foul and hurl personal insults or silly childish jibes such as the Famous Five one above.
mynamejeff wrote: » ye are always happy to reply same lies different thread
Truthvader wrote: » Try to apply some intelligence to the conversation. You asked about squaddies who shoot innocent people. FFS
end of the road wrote: » that is because there is nothing shadowy about sf. sf are sf, nothing to hide and everything out in the open, the party of modernisation and law and order. sf are not scumbags but a modern, forward thinking legitimate political party. the IRA are gone and have been since 1998, however when they did exist they were doing more or less the same as those fighting for independence, as in fighting for liberation and freedom for the nationalist and catholic communities from sectarianism, bigotry and potential ethnic cleansing. also, there are no such thing as shinner bots as i have explained plenty of times before. incorrect, the posters in opposition to you do not and never have told lies. it was a valid and correct question relating to your point.
Edgware wrote: » The Provos were good at the sectarianism and ethnic cleansing as well
end of the road wrote: » defending oneself against oppression is not ethnic cleansing.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » You’ll have to explain how things like Eniskillen, Warrington, and Kingsmill were defending oneself against oppression, as opposed to just being atrocities carried out by sociopathic mass murderers.
jm08 wrote: » So, Bloody Sunday and Dublin-Monaghan bombings etc. were ethnic cleanings carried out by sociopathic mass murderers?
Edgware wrote: » Kingsmill, Enniskillen. A proud day for Irish republicans. Not forgetting the slaughter of young people on a night out in Birmingham. No need for anymore whataboutery fron Sinn Fein scum
Shefwedfan wrote: » Female? they are just for raping, doesn't matter what age.....thats the PIRA way If they get caught, don't worry Sinn Fein will make it go away
Deleted User wrote: » You may not like SF and have valid reasons for doing so but to say a paramilitary organisation's leaders cannot and should not get involved in politics is beyond ridiculous.
Seth Brundle wrote: » Are you referring to Gerry here?
end of the road wrote: » that is because there is nothing shadowy about sf. sf are sf, nothing to hide and everything out in the open, the party of modernisation and law and order. sf are not scumbags but a modern, forward thinking legitimate political party. the IRA are gone and have been since 1998, however when they did exist they were doing more or less the same as those fighting for independence, as in fighting for liberation and freedom for the nationalist and catholic communities from sectarianism, bigotry and potential ethnic cleansing. also, there are no such thing as shinner bots as i have explained plenty of times before. incorrect, the posters in opposition to you do not and never have told lies. .
maccored wrote: » I asked you about your imaginary shinnerbots and you tell me Im lying. care to explain what youre on about?
mynamejeff wrote: » bombing babies and bands aside intimidating witnesses into silence is scumbaggery . murdering gardai and innocent people is scumbaggery allowing drug dealers to operate in an area destroying family's as long as thy pay tax is scumbaggery smuggling fuel cigarettes and booze is scumbaggery SF have all the criteria of a organised crime gang asserting that the SF IRA that exists today has any legitimate connection with the SF that existed during the war of independence and civil war is a lie , claiming that the current SF is the oldest political party in Ireland has been done in previous threads is also a lie. here is the link in the SF IRA website asking people to join the "online army"https://www.sinnfein.ie/contents/26753 Shinner bots have been publicly asked to stop abusing people on line . google the world for further information . you know this you post on all SF threads as do the same few profiles
piplip87 wrote: » Are ye Shinnerbots screaming media bias ? Jaysus FF/FG are getting some serious heat over this golf gate craic. Although I haven't heard one claim of media bias ?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Same profiles on all these threads jeff. All shades of opinion...same posters with them. Only one party caught suggesting anonymous online campaigns though...guess who that was?