Church on Tuesday wrote: » And supremely talented and a counter culture figurehead. I once had an interesting discussion about Nirvana with some randomner on here who reckoned they were not all that, very odd; give Nevermind a spin right now and if you are not moving to it then frankly you are dead inside.
Hotblack Desiato wrote: » Bleach is better though. Both in terms of its rawness and the songwriting. I mean, I loved Nevermind at the time but it's just too overproduced and some lyrics or indeed entire songs are trite filler.
Deleted User wrote: » What is your fascination with my forbidden closet of mystery? - Chief Wiggam..
Sam Quentin wrote: » Well I suppose that explains it. But rave and pop and even Ska/Mod were a million times better than that stuff in the 80s early 90s.. so basically it was kinda crap emmmm not popular or not as popular!?
MoonUnit75 wrote: » ... It was also a time when pop music culture was dominated by hip-hop and rave..
El Tarangu wrote: » Some bands/musicians capture the zeitgeist in a way that is out of all proportion to the quality of their output; it helps when the frontman is a romantic, tortured soul, who conveniently dies young and is as such preserved forever after as an icon, without their legacy being sullied by any decline in the quality of their music, or their growing old and becoming boring an conventional (like the rest of us). The Doors/Jim Morrison is another example of this. (btw, I enjoy the music of Nirvana, but despise The Doors)
Hotblack Desiato wrote: » I saw them both the following night in the Top Hat if that's any good to ya Almost stole the show... and I was and still am a massive SY fan.
Hotblack Desiato wrote: » The Doors is the perfect example of that. That comedian guy who used to do links on MTV Europe ~30(!) years ago summed up the three phases of Morrison's career perfectly - - You're drunk, you're nobody - You're drunk, you're famous - You're drunk, you're dead. Still unaccountably popular among Northside wannabe hard-men though :pac:
punisher5112 wrote: » Aviici is dead too.... It happens more then one would think and you would wonder.... .
Rothko wrote: » The fascination with his death has to do with the fact that he died so young and that his death is surrounded in mystery. A lot of people think that he was murdered and that Courtney Love had something to do with it. Not me, though. I think it was a straightforward case of suicide.
Notdeco wrote: » Cos his gf killed him and framed it like a suicide...
MoonUnit75 wrote: » I think it’s partly because he was such an anti-hero at a time when ‘rock stars’ of the late 80s and early 90s thought they were gods, because they were treated like that. All big production with a slick, polished image and a kind of mystique like they weren’t like normal people. Kurt was like that odd kid in school who listened to 70s Norwegian punk and didn’t make a big deal about going out of their way to be a misfit. It was also a time when pop music culture was dominated by hip-hop and rave. Nirvana were like a direct kick in the balls on behalf of everyone that hated that scene. Nirvana gave those people a cultural scene to call their own. Then there’s the tragic ‘romantic poet’ thing with this quiet and intense guy who never felt comfortable with all the fame and then died young.
Deleted User wrote: » The fact Dave Grohl did so much and is still going adds to it as well. Younger people get exposed to his music and then learn the backstory.
Montage of Feck wrote: » There is no band that has matched the raw dark edged, manic intensity of Nirvana.
Rothko wrote: » Sir Henry's Played there as a support act to Sonic Youth. Oh, if I had a time machine that would surely be one of the gigs I'd like to go back to and visit.
Standard Toaster wrote: » Suggs, lol
Akrasia wrote: » Speaking of Sonic Youth, their former band mate Ian Curtis’s life had an eerily similar tragic arc a few years before.