Infowars reporter Millie Weaver ‘arrested’ mid-premiere of her whistleblowing investigation into ‘shadow government’ Investigative reporter Millie Weaver and her husband have reportedly been arrested at the same time her documentary on the US “shadow government” was being screened on YouTube, sending Conservative Twitter into theory overdrive. Weaver’s “arrest” at the couple’s home – which has yet to be confirmed by authorities – was initially reported by Infowars on Friday, shortly after the YouTube premiere of her documentary film “ShadowGate.” The film purports to expose the secrets of the massive ‘Deep State’ intelligence apparatus manipulating politics within the US and beyond its borders, based on the reports of two private intelligence whistleblowers. Video of the couple’s apparent arrest, shot by Weaver herself, was posted to Twitter by her Infowars colleague Adan Salazar, opening on Weaver asking in disbelief if “a grand jury indicted [her].”
ohnonotgmail wrote: » i can read perfectly well thanks. and i presume you know what that legislation was and that it would be beneficial to the credit card companies? but of course the existence of that legislation was public knowledge. all legislation going through congress is public knowledge. so what private information did Pelosi have?
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is the government agency responsible for monitoring these kinds of transactions. It has adopted rules regarding insider trading that define it as any securities transaction made when a person ( Pelosi) involved in the trade has nonpublic, material information, and uses this information to violate his or her duty to maintain the confidentiality of such knowledge by using it for financial gain.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » 60 minutes Steve Kroft report was about senators using inside information to trade stocks. The information was not public. Pelosi got very upset when confronted. Nine minutes 10 seconds. You can see here the lies. Under the law.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » pelosi isnt a senator.
Dohnjoe wrote: » Interesting to see how quickly an ignorant internet suspicion cements itself "I suspect something, therefore it has to be true"
The Nal wrote: » lol. Just read back through the last couple of pages. Comedy gold again from CS. Just can't get anything right.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » The 60 minutes report isn't just about Pelosi. Fascinating to watch debunkers downplay corruption here and position she did nothing wrong.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » it is pelosi we are discussing. or rather it is pelosi you want to discuss to distract from one of your fellow travelers being arrested.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » I don't support Trump or his cronies. Don't support democrats and their cronies either. Not sure where you got information i supported Trump?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » odd then that you jumped in with the pelosi stuff when bannon was mentioned. probably just a coincidence. though there is rule #39.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » I don’t support any politician . I view political events and matters as they are without preference. Some posters only see Republicans as the bad people. The reality is the democrats if they got authority will not change course and straighten out the troubles, disputes and differences there is! Obama was the first black president and he came in with the promise of hope and change. Did the black peoples lives change with him in power? Did crime rates decline? Did housing improve? Did he alter Bush foreign policy decisions? I have yet to see a president correct the problems there. Biden is hardly the man to bring about change?. Democrats still sticking to the old guard and not changing the way things are done in Washington.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » I view political events and matters as they are without preference.
Dohnjoe wrote: » jesus christ. Anyway, is there a conspiracy here?
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Blackout of information and suppression is not a conspiracy. Youtube pulled her video and gave no written explantation to why. Why said in her video can be considered hate speech? I followed 20 minutes of it, and some stuff Snowden reflected on before happens in the background was mentioned here . Her angle is some shady private network/intelligence companies got retained to take down the Trump presidency? I didn’t get far enough in to see the evidence but the first 20 minutes had interesting observations. Q is someone claiming to be insider and they claim Trump was taking on paedophiles and plan is to get rid of the deep state. Trump wished good wishes to Maxwell in Jail, so fighting them how? Getting rid of the deep state while surrunding himself with them and providing them jobs in the White House make no sense here either? Millie allegation's powerful political enemies would go after Trump, i don't find nuts. Since the level of hate is strong against Trump most people don't care?
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Blackout of information and suppression is not a conspiracy. Youtube pulled her video and gave no written explantation to why. Why said in her video can be considered hate speech?
Deleted User wrote: » You've been arguing about it for a week here, would you not watch the rest of it?
The Nal wrote: » It was taken down because of its dangerous and misleading content and it is their policy to do so now. As it is policy to remove nonsense conspiracy videos about Bill Gates, 5G causing coronavirus, dangerous medical advice and the like. The reason they're doing it is because people such as yourself are so easily manipulated by a short snappy video that they may act on these things. Its the right thing to do.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Her video can't be proven to be misleading in less 24 hours, that's an impossibility. Youtube made a judgement call here.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » R Qanon whatever that is probably a disinformation campaign to make people who question Russiagate look foolish.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Her video can't be proven to be misleading in less 24 hours
The Nal wrote: » Yes it can. It can be proven as misleading on first watch. Whats interesting is that you're defending a documentary that you havent even seen! lol. Incredible scenes. You are the target market for grifters.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » How would you know?
King Mob wrote: » Because it's from someone who worked for Info Wars. So either they are profoundly dishonest or they are profoundly dumb. And because it's based off Qanon bull****, which is an obvious fantasy. It's very easy to tell.
enno99 wrote: » How long before Qanon start to be blamed for violence
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Qanon started in Nov 2017. The DNC hack was 2016. Qanon stuff worked because debunkers can't tell the difference now, as you see above.
King Mob wrote: » Well it will when some idiot does something stupid, like how it happened with the pizza gate stuff. Not sure what your post has to do with my point though. Qanon is obvious nonsense, so anyone spouting it, especially for profit, can be dismissed out of hand. And the documentary you are defending promotes the same crap as Qanon. It's not different. The point remains also that this bull**** artist worked for Info Wars, which is another reason to dismiss her out of hand. Again, you guys are doing our job for us by defending this obvious bull****. Please keep going.
enno99 wrote: » What is wrong with getting paid for your work ?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/867a9f20e705add43a3ada2e4f4480cc.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w4.vanillicon.com/v2/43d5d8eb6f74f970975eb821385072d4.svg)