Infowars reporter Millie Weaver ‘arrested’ mid-premiere of her whistleblowing investigation into ‘shadow government’ Investigative reporter Millie Weaver and her husband have reportedly been arrested at the same time her documentary on the US “shadow government” was being screened on YouTube, sending Conservative Twitter into theory overdrive. Weaver’s “arrest” at the couple’s home – which has yet to be confirmed by authorities – was initially reported by Infowars on Friday, shortly after the YouTube premiere of her documentary film “ShadowGate.” The film purports to expose the secrets of the massive ‘Deep State’ intelligence apparatus manipulating politics within the US and beyond its borders, based on the reports of two private intelligence whistleblowers. Video of the couple’s apparent arrest, shot by Weaver herself, was posted to Twitter by her Infowars colleague Adan Salazar, opening on Weaver asking in disbelief if “a grand jury indicted [her].”
Ipso wrote: » There's a current conspiracy in the news; Bannon and some Trump lackey are facing fraud charges relating to the privately build border wall. I'm sure d'deep state made them do it.
Dohnjoe wrote: » Which is really just a small diversion from allegations that the current President of the United States is conspiring with his own party and the head of the US postal service to sabotage the next election. But apparently these types of conspiracies just aren't sexy enough.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Apparently Alex Jones has cut ties with her. Roger Stone was accused in this documentary and Alex got upset about it, that's what i am reading online. This event made Millie lot of money so i doubt she's that pissed off losing the Alex gig.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » Bannon was arrested by US Postal Service agents which i thought was a nice touch.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Nancy Pelosi net worth is 120 million to 140 million, do people honestly believe she made that kind of money from her salary? They're all corrupt but Bannon an easy target because he allied with Trump a few years ago.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Nancy Pelosi net worth is 120 million to 140 million, do people honestly believe she made that kind of money from her salary?
They're all corrupt but Bannon an easy target because he allied with Trump a few years ago.
Dohnjoe wrote: » She didn't make her fortune from her salary, which is around $220,000 per year, most of it comes from real estate investment with her husbandhttps://moneyinc.com/nancy-pelosi-net-worth/ They aren't "all corrupt", there are plenty of politicians on all sides who have legitimately made their money. This type of comment is just another example of your lazy thinking and generalisations connected to your world views.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Dohnjoe is defending corruption when it's the side he supports. That's her wealth not her husbands fortune. How did she accumulate 140 million from a salary of 200,000 a year? Dohnjoe will not look further into this beyond what he reads on website supporting her.
King Mob wrote: » Lol. Also have people given up trying to defend this bull**** artist and her bull**** documentary now?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » all quietly forgotten about. still, raising $170,000 to pay for your legal fees when you rob and assault your mother is a nice grift.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » The mother claims she dropped the charges against her daughter in May. For whatever reason, the State of Ohio decided to still prosecute a family matter case by secret indictment in July and only arrest her in August (the week her video got released) There some unusual things happening here no matter how much you want to downplay it. Yes there was enough suckers to pay her legal fees Yes Millie according to the story tackled her mother to the ground, but the state still has not revealed why they decided to pursue a familiy matter case after the mother had dropped all charges? I only watched 20 minutes of the video, before it got taken down for Hate Speech on Youtube. What said in the rest of the video was hateful?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » what does that have to do with bannon being arrested?
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » You licking lips Bannon was arrested ok be happy your side won a victory today. .
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Just pointing out you could arrest many others beside Bannon for fraud and insider trading.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » are you not happy that a man that defrauded people will face consequences for what he did? presumably you are inplying that you are on Bannons side. i presume you have some actual evidence that pelosi is involved in fraud and insider trading?
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » I have no skin in the game. Bannon arrest doesn't surprise me. Difference between me and you, i know both parties are at it. Do you honestly believe democrats don't cheat and steal like Republicans? The biggest fraud occurring right now with trillions being handed out to investors who trade the stock markets. 1.1 million signed on for unemployment benefits despite 7 trillion or more got printed by the FED. Why are the democrats and republicans not asking where the money gone?
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » I have no skin in the game. Bannon arrest doesn't surprise me. Difference between me and you, i know both parties are at it. Do you honestly believe democrats don't cheat and steal like Republicans? The biggest fraud occurring right now with trillions being handed out to investors who trade the stock markets. 1.1 million signed on for unemployment benefits, this week, despite 7 trillion or more got printed by the FED. Why are the democrats and republicans not asking where the money gone?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » i presume you have some actual evidence that pelosi is involved in fraud and insider trading?
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi fired back Sunday at a CBS News' "60 Minutes" report that highlighted several instances of what it suggested could be "soft corruption." The show looked at the investments of various lawmakers -- including Pelosi, House Speaker John Boehner and Republican Rep. Spencer Bachus of Alabama -- who reportedly bought stocks around the same time legislation involving those investments was being discussed.
Dohnjoe wrote: » To explain your thought process and the faults here.. You discovered that Pelosi has a lot of money, it's quite a lot more than what she would make from a career in politics, however you don't bother to find out the reason why (ignorance), so you jumped straight to the suspicion that she is corrupt. This is faulty thinking. That faulty thinking is based on this underlying false notion you have that "all politicians are corrupt". Which is a personal world view you hold, a false one. It's a crystal clear example of how faulty world views combined with ignorance quickly leads to faulty thinking (and knowing you, now this faulty suspicion has cemented as a "fact" in your mind) Likewise Donald Trump has a lot of wealth, Bernie Sanders, the Obama's - it doesn't automatically mean they are all corrupt. Each is a case-by-case basis.
Dohnjoe wrote: » Likewise Donald Trump has a lot of wealth, Bernie Sanders, the Obama's - it doesn't automatically mean they are all corrupt. Each is a case-by-case basis.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Too powerful a lady to bring down. From time to time some journalists will ask hard questions about things they find. Love CNN saying "soft corruption" they are so transparent in their downplay.https://edition.cnn.com/2011/11/13/politics/60-minutes-pelosi/index.html
ohnonotgmail wrote: » that is it? that is all you have? pathetic even for you.
Obviously, the reason insider trading is illegal is because it gives the insider an unfair advantage in the market, puts the interests of the insider above those to whom he or she owes a fiduciary duty, and allows an insider to artificially influence the value of a company's stocks.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » You know insider trading illegal right? pathetic you will downplay corruption by either side. Why bother with laws then?https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/what-is-insider-trading-and-why-is-it-illegal-31598
ohnonotgmail wrote: » I'd say you were googling furiously after mentioning pelosi in the hope of finding something, anything, some piece of dirt to throw around. sad.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Faulty thinking believing she could earn that wealth from earning only 200,000 a year. How does she earn 140 million. 10 years in the job, she still only would have earned 2 miliion + (not taxed income) She's corrupt, and not that difficult to see why.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » there was nothing to suggest it was insider trading. nothing. It was an IPO. thousands of people probably bought shares in the same offering. for it to be insider trading pelosi would have to have some inside knowledge not available to the public. there is no suggestion of what that knowledge might be. I'd say you were googling furiously after mentioning pelosi in the hope of finding something, anything, some piece of dirt to throw around. sad.
The show looked at the investments of various lawmakers -- including Pelosi, House Speaker John Boehner and Republican Rep. Spencer Bachus of Alabama -- who reportedly bought stocks around the same time legislation involving those investments was being discussed.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Can you read
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/867a9f20e705add43a3ada2e4f4480cc.svg)
