NH2013 wrote: » Well I know the A330 can’t land on Dublin’s current runway above about 205 tons if it’s dry or about 195tons if the runway is wet, and it has a maximum takeoff weight of 242tons, so would often be above those weights taking off, so I’m sure many other similar sized aircraft such as the 777, 787, A350 must be in a similar boat. Only going from what I’ve heard, I’ve been told by an A330 pilot that most takeoffs out of Dublin would require a diversion to Shannon for an immediate landing, as coming back into Dublin would not be possible. The A330s maximum landing weight is 187tons normally.
HTCOne wrote: » Where do you send the tests then if the Government are using all the capacity in the country? Imagine testing someone who has just arrived from Germany, then telling them to wait while we send their test back to Germany to be processed.
NH2013 wrote: » Well I know the A330 can’t land on Dublin’s current runway above about 205 tons if it’s dry or about 195tons if the runway is wet .
Cookiemunster wrote: » I'm pretty sure that we only used German labs during the height of the lockdown. We now have capacity to process the tests in Ireland. It is still too slow though.
HTCOne wrote: » 3.5 - 4 days wait currently according to news reports the last few days. It was about 24 hours until a few weeks ago but the recent surge in cases and resulting demand for testing has caused a backlog again. News reports I heard have it down to a number of reasons; the number of contact tracers fell due the big drop in demand when we consistently had single figures of new cases daily, and they were volunteers who haven't been replaced, so it is taking longer to find those who need a test, the demand on testing labs themselves etc.
rivegauche wrote: » Either travel from abroad is causing the issue and support should be given by Government to test those entering at ports and airports or else it isn't the issue and community transmission is the issue in which case the travel restrictions which are effectively bans should be lifted. There is no coherency in strategy. I say DAA are apathetic. This is a company with huge debts and no income to service debts and the best it can come up with to fight the lockdown is perspex and messages about social distancing.
rivegauche wrote: » When are the Government approved appointees in DAA going to break ranks and make it politically uncomfortable for the Government by criticizing Government policy? Answer: Never, because they won't bite the hand that feeds them irrespective of how much damage is done to the Irish economy, their organisation or the employment of their staff.
LiamaDelta wrote: » It's not an either/or issue and it changes very quickly. Currently travel from abroad is not a major contributing factor, but likely the reason for this is that travel is restricted. i.e. the restrictions work, because they reduce the movement of people. We do not have the capacity for mass-testing of incoming visitors in this country. We can barely test the numbers required within the country currently to contain outbreaks. There's little point in comparing us to other countries that have a long history of investing in public health over decades, we haven't done that and are now paying the price.
LiamaDelta wrote: » Seems to be back down to less than 24 hours now (from testing to results). There was an issue between Friday and Monday that caused delays but seems to be resolved now. Likely the delays were due to a lack of staff as it seems the HSE are dependent on people offering to do do the test and trace work outside of their regular work. Presumably people are less inclined to give up their weekends if they can help it.
Blut2 wrote: » But for most of July we had around 10,000 spare testing capacity every single day. And approx 15,000 arrivals in DUB a day. So thats completely untrue - we had the capacity to mass test a majority of our incoming visitors.
LiamaDelta wrote: » My comment was regarding our capacity in general, not just one month in the middle of a global pandemic. Having 10k 'spare' capacity one month is not much use to a tourism industry. How do you decide who gets to use the spare capacity? It's not really spare capacity either, most of the resources have to be taken from somewhere else.
EchoIndia wrote: » The primary purpose of testing is to identify those in the population who are carrying the virus and to test their contacts (and as necessary their contacts' contacts) also. Subsequent isolation for up to 14 days of anyone who tests positive is essential to suppression of the virus so as to (a) prevent widespread transmission in the community and (b) enable society to function as normally as possible. Widespread community transmission carries a significant risk of older and medically vulnerable people catching COVID, with foreseeable consequences. Devotion of public health service testing capacity to enabling a lot more travel in and out of the country has to come a clear second to the above primary considerations.
MrMusician18 wrote: » Who would pay the €2m per day such a testing regime would cost? Airlines or passengers?
billy few mates wrote: » The airlines should pay for it or pass it on to their passengers if they prefer but there's no way the people of Ireland should be asked to pay €200 per test so Ryanair can sell a few more seats for €19.99 or whatever. There's a global pandemic on, we should be taking advice from medical health professionals not airline tycoons.
gral6 wrote: » Global pandemic my ass...much more people are dying from ordinary flu...I wonder how many people will die next year because idiots from HSE cancelled all cancer pre screening. Hospitals have never been that quite before. Total shambles and mess
gral6 wrote: » Global pandemic my ass...
Blut2 wrote: » This would be a fair point if we were at/approaching testing capacity. We weren't, and still aren't. As such, using some of the unused testing capacity to try to prevent importation of more cases into the country via the airports is an entirely reasonable use of resources. If need be the testing capacity can always be re-routed away from the airport at a future date, if its required elsewhere. Again, Ireland hasn't been anywhere near testing capacity all summer, and still isn't today. You decide where to use the spare capacity by...using it somewhere. Are you seriously arguing that its better to decide not to use it because its too difficult to decide what to use it on? Theres just no reason not to be using that spare capacity for arrivals at DUB, or via the ports, or any other airport. We have direct flights arriving in every day from Texas and other covid hot spots, do you not think it might be a worthwhile investment of resources to randomly test arrivals from such places? Because thats exactly what actually well run European countries, that are faring a lot better in their corona response, are doing these days.
LiamaDelta wrote: » But it's not spare capacity, it has to be resourced and paid for from other parts of the health system. Those people are not currently sitting around doing nothing. They are doing other work that won't get done if they have to go sit in an airport and test people coming from Texas. Your preference is to cancel Physiotherapy, psychology and various other appointments for citizens, in preference for testing tourists from Texas. I agree that increased testing would be great, but we're nowhere near being able to roll it out when we are barely able to cope with the current outbreaks. Out of interest, which European countries should I look at as a guide? Germany I presume is one.
All passengers arriving in France from 16 “high-risk” red-listed countries — including the US, South Africa, Israel, Brazil, Serbia and Turkey — are subject to a PCR test.[...]Several French airports — including Paris-Charles de Gaulle and Paris-Orly, and others in Bordeaux and Lyon — are also currently offering voluntary testing for people arriving in France from countries that are not red-listed. -- Germany's health minister Jens Spahn declared testing will be compulsory for people arriving from “high-risk” areas — which includes about 130 countries[...]Holidaymakers arriving from other areas that are considered “non-risk” are also eligible for free testing on a voluntary basis, but these tests will take place at a local health centre, rather than the airport. -- On 15 June, Iceland began offering passengers a choice between taking a Covid-19 test upon arrival, or quarantining for two weeks. -- Sheremetyevo Airport — one of four major international airports that serve the city of Moscow — launched “express” Covid-19 testing on 20 July. -- Italy has imposed mandatory coronavirus testing for all travellers arriving from Croatia, Greece, Malta and Spain. Travellers arriving at an airport, port or border crossing can choose from a number of options, including rapid tests on the spot etc
Blut2 wrote: » Thats...not remotely medically accurate. Do you think physiotherapists and psychologists are carrying out covid tests? Administering covid tests isn't a complex medical procedure, specialized staff are hired and trained to do it very quickly. No country is pulling senior doctors from their area of expertise to do a very quick, very basic task. And the testing isn't for the benefit of the tourist from Texas, its to prevent said tourist from spreading the virus to Irish people while they're in Ireland. In regards to other countries, its becoming "most of Europe" at this stage: There is absolutely no reason Ireland can't do similar when our European neighbours are all doing it. Other than government incompetence, that is.
MrMusician18 wrote: » These express tests are not particularly accurate to my knowledge - I can stand corrected on this.
gral6 wrote: » Global pandemic my ass...much more people are dying from ordinary flu...