jh79 wrote: » It's funny too that Murphy said he spoke to the IRA rather than former members of the IRA.
FrancieBrady wrote: » He was 'unfit' because he 'refused to come before the house' and that was why he was sacked. You do some twisting blanch
FrancieBrady wrote: » The only 'witnesses' to the Paul Quinn murder were those who were there. The Gardai, PSNI and the IMC know who was there.
grayzer75 wrote: » By the same token how can a man be appointed as the top police officer in the free state when in his role in the security forces in the north he colluded with loyalists to murder innocent Irish citizens?
blanch152 wrote: » Great, look forward to Dessie Ellis coming before the house and explaining his criminal history. Maybe, when we resume.
Shefwedfan wrote: » Yes and SF are protecting those people.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Get it all out there blanch. If you want to know what Ellis did, google is your friend, his part in the conflict/war is all there.
blanch152 wrote: » More lies and obfuscation. You know, I know, anyone who has read up on this case knows, that the apology is not acceptable to Breege Quinn, and that Conor Murphy has not withdrawn his most serious accusation that Paul Quinn was a criminal. Neither has he gone to the police with the information about the people in the IRA he claimed to have spoken to.https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/breege-quinn-calls-on-conor-murphy-to-say-paul-quinn-was-not-a-criminal-1.4176243 This case isn't over, and I make no apology for raising it again and again, until Paul Quinn's family get the apology they deserve, the action from Sinn Fein that they deserve, and the justice they deserve. I am sorry if it inconveniences your rosy-eyed view of Sinn Fein.
FrancieBrady wrote: » It's a post conflict/war society where many do not trust the security forces north or south. Why would they trust when your dealings with them are used in the way this Guard used them.
blanch152 wrote: » A man. singularly unfit for public office.
jh79 wrote: » Yet you have no problem with the murderers of Paul Quinn's close association with SF even after the murder and believe them to be a suitable party to govern in not one but two conuntries! Think you're the one who needs to take a long hard look at themselves. How can SF TD be a Minister for Justice while the party continues to associate with active criminal gangs ?
onh81 wrote: » I take it you’ll also be coming up to Cullyhanna to show your support for the Quinns?
Truthvader wrote: » Would you ever stop dignifying the Sinn Fein IRA campaign of death and terrorism as a "conflict/war." It is no more a conflict/war than the Hutch /Kinihan killings - though in fairness to the Hutch and Kinihans they don't murder random members of the public. The only people to "do not trust" the Guards are criminals and their cheerleaders
FrancieBrady wrote: » Don't vote for him so.
jh79 wrote: » Francie, would it be fair to say that you don't care what SF get up to as long as they deliver a United Ireland?
FrancieBrady wrote: » I have given you personally the names of 2 SF reps I wouldn't vote for. Stop JH79. I care about my country and I care about who governs us.
jh79 wrote: » Asked before but didn't get an answer. What would it take for you not to vote for SF outside of the terms of the GFA? If there was evidence that the party helped Slab or McCabe in a meaningful way such as passing on sensitive information would you withdraw your support?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Already answered. If the party break their committment to the GFA...if any party does (that includes FG, FF and others) then they won't be getting a vote from me. What individual members of a party do is subject to review, if they do it with he sanction of the party then that would remove my support too. Why the scrutiny here? How do you decide who to vote for?
grayzer75 wrote: » Just google Drew Harris collusion, miami showband, glennane gange, mc gurks bar, loughlinisland and you'll see what he was at. But we know the wee FFG fanboys don't care what happens to people north of the border unless it suits their agenda. Drew Harris was the top man in special branch in the north. He and his colleagues were running loyalist agents across the north and giving them information on 'targets'. Google Mark Haddock and you'll see the type of person Harris was running but you don't care because it doesn't suit your agenda.
Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: » Oh deary deary me. More lack of basic comprehension skills from Johnny Dogs. The GSOC complaint was in relation to the Garda Golden investigation, not the Garda Donohue one.
Shefwedfan wrote: » They won't read one word Seemingly the SF message to stop spreading vile comments on social media hasn't been passed to the boards team
IAMAMORON wrote: » Well considering Drew Harris was 10 years of age at the time of the Miami Showband massacre... I am reporting you for trolling btw.
grayzer75 wrote: » Report all you want I couldn't give a toss. Stephen Travers stated in public that Harris tried at all costs to stop papers being released to the official investigation to protect agents - that's collusion....
IAMAMORON wrote: » Who?