loyatemu wrote: » https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/virgin-makes-gigabit-internet-available-across-its-service-1.4334185 TBH I don't see the point of 1Gb for domestic users, 500Mb should be sufficient for 99.9% of subscribers (I downgraded to 250Mb and didn't notice any difference). But anyway, it's now (or shortly) available to VM subscribers.
Mav11 wrote: » Quality and stability is far more important than headline speed.
theteal wrote: » I excitedly looked up the UK site. M500 is still the top plan for us over here
stevek93 wrote: » It isn't it is copper to the house, now correct me if I am wrong but I don't think I am.
lotas wrote: » the core network is Fiber. Depending on the area, the Fiber could end at the top of the road, or could run down the eves of the house and terminate outside your house. but from there on, its copper...
Wanderer78 wrote: » apologies, i meant its fiber to the house, then copper into the house, apparently
bk wrote: » They offer 1Gig in the UK in select cities:https://www.virginmedia.com/shop/broadband/gig1-gigabit-broadband
It's listed on their web site now... €60 a month / €85 a month after 6 monthshttps://www.virginmedia.ie/broadband...dband-package/
Wanderer78 wrote: » I was informed by a virgin tech, that a large proportion of their network is actually fibre, including to the home, this true? Think we re on a 250 line, no need for 1gb, 250 is more than enough
okidoki987 wrote: » If you can get Siro that is an expensive price for first 12 months at €72.50 a month average. Vodafone 1Gbps for €30 a month, Sky 500mbps for €30 a month, Pure 1Gbps €35 for 12 months on a 12m contract.
CoBo55 wrote: » Enniscorthy got rewired completely a few years ago. All new estates that weren't wired with the original co-ax cable are ftth, every premises has a little grey box which has fibre to it. The connection continues into the premises to a box similar to the ont siro/eir use, instead of cat6 to the modem a co-ax cable is used.
bk wrote: » Hold on a second, it looks like VM have just changed their website and they are now saying that this has only 50mb/s upload speed, NOT 100mb/s like it said just a few minutes ago!!!!
Thor wrote: » Yeah seen 100Mb myself and signed up, and now it shows 50Mb. I'm guessing that is just messed up data on the page as they copied most of the content and terms from their 500Mb service. Can't be only 50Mb.
stevek93 wrote: » Is it fiber across the top of the houses I thought all copper?
Wanderer78 wrote: » no, id say the previous answer is correct, id say i have a hybrid supply, im not convinced theres fiber in the street at all, id say its all copper tbh, but shur it works fine at the moment
Thor wrote: » It's DOCSIS 3.1 i believe, meaning it's fibre backend and than copper network for the estate.
Wanderer78 wrote: » speeds are impressive for copper though, because some speeds in the town on copper are dreadful, for some providers
Mr.S wrote: » I never understood this logic, you can download faster = less waiting times. You would notice a significant difference from 250Mb to 1GB with large file transfers. If you have light internet usage, then obviously you don't need it, but given the price you'd think the only people getting it are those who want it.
loyatemu wrote: » how many large file transfers does the average person make, and even if they do can the server they're downloading from deliver at > 250Mb/s and can their network card and hard drive receive at that speed? There's a lot of variables - IMO you'd only see the benefit if you have a lot of simultaneous heavy users, most people would see more benefit from upgrading their WiFi kit.