onh81 wrote: » My point is blindingly obvious. You and every other critic of SF use Paul Quinn’s death as part of your agenda. You and I both know you don’t actually give a fúck
onh81 wrote: » Well Paddy instead of using Paul Quinn’s death for your own Sinn Fein-bashing agenda why don’t you come up to Cullyhanna in a show of solidarity for the Quinn family, since this death 13 years ago is still clearly playing on your mind. Don’t worry, it seems to have deeply affected a lot of people like yourself, perhaps you could run a bus up, maybe contact your local FFG office, they also seemed quite concerned around the time of the elections (although I’m not sure they’re still as worried about it at this present moment in time) You know people like you act like you have some sort of moral high ground, when in reality you use deaths like Paul Quinn’s in your anti-SF rants it’s utterly pathetic. If Quinn was alive now he’d probably be still driving about in lorries with laundered diesel in the back and people like you would be branding him a Republican criminal.
blanch152 wrote: » Interesting analogy about "stopped beating your wife". Isn't that just the praise you generally seek for Gerry Adams. For 40 years the IRA went around killing, bombing and murdering, and when they stopped, you expect people to forget about those 40 years and praise them for being men of peace, just like the man who stops beating his wife and expects praise?
Shefwedfan wrote: » How many of these stories have they had to deny so far this year?
McMurphy wrote: » It does however say the following, not going to copy and paste the whole article, read back from this part, it's about Gerry Adams. The Irish Times based it's whole story on a leaky guard, and published it without first checking with the party the story was about. So we have only the guards version of events ref the witness being a member of the shinners, then that changed to "an associate". Now a spokesperson for Adams is saying he passed all the information he had at the time to the Gardai, the Taoiseach and the justice minister at the time. They say they weren't happy with how it was dealt with at the time - hence why they took it up with GSOC. You certainly appear to be lacking that ability, as I said the Times have now revised their version of the story. (That's not a tweet on Twitter) stop embarrassing yourself.
blanch152 wrote: » There it is again, the unsubstantiated slander of Paul Quinn, for which Mary-Lou, Conor Murphy, and others have had to apologise, is repeated by a Sinn Fein supporter/voter/acolyte/defender/member (delete as appropriate) on social media. Exactly the type of behaviour that many of us abhor.
Truthvader wrote: » Typical Sinn Fein inside out morality. There pals murder a boy but the only evil they can see is other people pointing it out. A sick society
JohnnyFlash wrote: » If Gerry Adams said it was daytime I’d turn on my torch before heading out the door. He’s a ritualistic and compulsive lier. He lies about being a member of the IRA; he lies about knowing his brother was a child molester before sending him into ‘Mexican Exile’ so he could work with kids; he lies about knowing where the bodies were buried. The fact of the matter is this lad felt he couldn’t go to the police with information on a murder and armed robbery without running it by some low level SF grunt. That grunt didn’t feel confident enough to say ‘Jesus, just go and tell them’. No, he had to approach the Ballymurphy Backroom team via El Presidente Adams. The wink and the nod to approach the police was given a few weeks later.
Of course we will never find out what went on in the murky depths of the SF/IRA sludge pool during those weeks. And once again it’s the fault of the Free State establishment media for lifting the slate and reporting on the various creepy crawlies and slugs who operate in ‘good republican’ circles up around the border.
jm08 wrote: » Did you see Bertie's half hearted apology? Why have the police not arrested anyone and put them before the courts?
blanch152 wrote: » I have rasied Paul Quinn's death numerous times on these forums, oftentimes outside of elections at times like this. It was a horrifying experience to listen to Breege Quinn and hear about what was done to her son, a human being, and then the way that denial and obfuscation and slander were used as tactics by Sinn Fein public representatives and social media trolls. I can tell you that people like me certainly do give a ****.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Who in SF denies what happened to Paul Quinn...and you only use Quinn and various other emotive selective victims when you wish to damage your boogeymen.
blanch152 wrote: » Oh, the answer to that is very clear. Unlike in the case of Donohoe's case, the witnesses were told by the Sinn Fein heirarchy in the case of Paul Quinn to sit still and stay mum.
FrancieBrady wrote: » The only 'witnesses' to the Paul Quinn murder were those who were there. The Gardai, PSNI and the IMC know who was there.
blanch152 wrote: » Still waiting for Conor Murphy to apologise to the Quinn family.
Truthvader wrote: » Am I right in thinking that the Sinn Fein IRA supporters are trying to make "an issue" out of whether or not the witness who felt compelled to check with Gerry Adams whether it was safe to assist the Guards was a Sinn Fein member or not? They simply do not understand that outside of criminalised societies no-one needs to go cap in hand to the local Godfather to get permission to assist in bringing a murderer to justice. The irony is that they felt compelled to seek permission from a person who directed a campaign of murder for 30 years. Again a sick society
FrancieBrady wrote: » The way in which Paul Quinn and his family was used in the run up to the election (there is a list of other selective victims if you need it) is indicative of this and as another poster said, those responsible for that really need to 'take a long hard look at themselves'.
jm08 wrote: » Blanch have you no shame? You continually use Mrs Quinn for your own dishonest agenda. Once again (I already posted this in reponse to a post you made, so its not like you know you are spinning lies). Taoiseach Bertie Ahern was forced to withdraw a so-called "slur" that linked the murder of South Armagh man Paul Quinn to a criminal feud. However, despite the concession, Mr Ahern revealed there is still no evidence to back up the belief of Mr Quinn's family that the attack was authorised by the IRA. And Sinn Fein's apology'I apologise for those remarks and I unreservedly withdraw them': SF's Murphy issues apology to family of Paul Quinnhttps://www.thejournal.ie/sinn-fein-...92967-Feb2020/
FrancieBrady wrote: » It's a post conflict/war society where many do not trust the security forces north or south. Why would they trust when your dealings with them are used in the way this Guard used them.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Murphy doesn't 'deny what happened to Paul Quinn'. Where did you get that from?
jh79 wrote: » How can SF TD be a Minister for Justice while the party continues to associate with active criminal gangs ?
grayzer75 wrote: » By the same token how can a man be appointed as the top police officer in the free state when in his role in the security forces in the north he colluded with loyalists to murder innocent Irish citizens?
blanch152 wrote: » We have already had a situation in the last few months where a Minister was deemed unfit for office because he wouldn't accept and trust the records of the security forces. That principle is now established and it means that Sinn Fein are unfit for public office.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w4.vanillicon.com/v2/4b1a2e86cedae1628937f4503f2281da.svg)
