Bowie wrote: » Active? No. Former, IRA pre GFA? Yes. Criminality in general? No, but I can only think of the SD's and maybe PBP who might have a clean slate on that.
jh79 wrote: » So if the same gang murder another person should SF continue to associate with them? So you want to replace non violent cronyism / nepotism towards bankers and developers with violent cronyism / nepotism with criminal gangs?
smurgen wrote: » Who Larry Goodman and Fine Gael? No not it all and both will probably cause deaths of Irish citizens soon. In fact I bet you could trace deaths all the way from the meat factories right now.
jm08 wrote: » But it was Bertie Ahearn who said it was criminal activitiy originally. He had got his information from the Gardai/PSNI.Garda says Quinn killing a criminal feud - Ahernhttps://www.irishtimes.com/news/garda-says-quinn-killing-a-criminal-feud-ahern-1.982248
Patrick2010 wrote: » From the report... A number of people were involved in the incident although they did not all necessarily play a part in the actual killing. Amongst those involved were people who had in various ways been associated with the PIRA at a local level, including as members of the organisation. Some of these people were accustomed over a substantial period of time to exercising considerable local influence, collectively and individually. This would have led such people to expect what they would consider as appropriate respect from others and to being able to undertake their activities – including criminal ones – without interference; they would find it very difficult to accept any waning in this influence and respect;
jh79 wrote: » So Murphy's mates aren't active? Slab was only imprisoned recently.
FrancieBrady wrote: » It isn't 'SF' associating with them, a member of SF is associating with an alleged gang member. I wouldn't vote for Connor Murphy on that basis just as I wouldn't vote for Hughie McElvaney or Michael Lowry but I have voted for FG and would again if I wanted them in power.
jh79 wrote: » At what point does it become a party issue? Also McElvaney isn't involved in murder, not comparable at all. Given my father worked for Eircom so not a fan of Lowry either but i'd be of the opinion that he wouldn't murder anyone so again not comparable.
Patrick2010 wrote: » Quoting a statement from a lying politician made 13 years ago?. So that proves it wasn't a punishment beating carried out by Provos?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Just glide over the point. If FG or FF member does something criminal...I don't tar the whole party with that brush. People associate with former members of the IRA all the time, it is more or less unavoidable here and in NI...I have been in the company of some I know to have been members. I would vociferously contest that my association with them was in any way an endorsement of the IRA whom I never supported.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Just glide over the point.If FG or FF member does something criminal...I don't tar the whole party with that brush. People associate with former members of the IRA all the time, it is more or less unavoidable here and in NI...I have been in the company of some I know to have been members. I would vociferously contest that my association with them was in any way an endorsement of the IRA whom I never supported.
jh79 wrote: » The criminal elements obviously have influence over the party otherwise Jock wouldn't have got away with murdering McCartney. And your ok with that?
IAMAMORON wrote: » The thing is Francie, if a Fianna Fáil or Fine Gael member does something illegal they get expelled from the party. Whereas in Sinn Féin / IRA you get a consultation process discussing damage limitation and how soon they bury the truth. That's the difference.
onh81 wrote: » Yeah, and I’m sure you care so dearly about a 21 year old killed 13 years ago.
Bowie wrote: » They might have heard it from the then Taoiseach Bertie Ahern. No worries you can use him and his family in the next election. Is it people saying he was a criminal or people like yourself bringing it up to use a murder victim and his family for party propaganda that's wrong?
FrancieBrady wrote: » No, FG just say, sit on the back benchs there and we will call you when we need you. Bertie will no doubt be the next Presidential candidate for FF. Lip service in other words.
IAMAMORON wrote: » I could respect what you are saying if you could name any Fine Gael backbenchers with a criminal conviction?
Niner leprauchan wrote: » And? What's your absolutely off topic point?
Niner leprauchan wrote: » The monk has no criminal convictions and was tax compliant. Kinda like Gerry and the boys
FrancieBrady wrote: » How many of them were involved in a 30 year conflict/war though. That ravaged our country and political systems. That was always going to take time to put right and exclusion is not the way...exclusion caused the issue. I never had a problem admitting criminal elements attached themselves to both the IRA and SF. But frankly, I see a party that in the main is as committed to democratic politics as any other.
mynamejeff wrote: » another thread to be strangled to death by shinnerbots , fact is sinn fein are two or three generations at least away from being anything other than a organised criminal gang and they will carry the hangover as long as they facilitate and shelter criminals murderers fraudsters podophiles and other assorted freaks almost all politicians are crooks but some are more crook than others
grayzer75 wrote: » Aye the real money is to be made by turning into another FFG.
DaveCliftonAP wrote: » Jesus Christ, poor effort.
mynamejeff wrote: » is politics about making money now ?
Truthvader wrote: » It is for Sinn Fein. Not one of them ever had a proper job
IAMAMORON wrote: » The thing is Francie, if a Fianna Fáil or Fine Gael member does something illegal they get expelled from the party.Whereas in Sinn Féin / IRA you get a consultation process discussing damage limitation and how soon they bury the truth. That's the difference.
Truthvader wrote: » No ; beating someone to death in a shed is what's wrong. This is self evident to everyone else