Bass Reeves wrote: » It would depend whether exemptions were allowed on top of multiplier. Lots of people depend on exemptions to get them.over the line. No exemption and 4X earnings might be little different to what there at present
Reversal wrote: » Or the stories of everything going over asking?
Bass Reeves wrote: » As I posted Consultants/contractors if genuinely that, then they are not an issue. However it more the idea that Apple or Google will allow thousands of employees who are WFH to live in countries other than Ireland. If they do then they will be libel for tax and social insurance in that country, they must register as an employer there. From there the question of VAT on work they do and how profits are taxed comes into play.
Cyrus wrote: » if we didnt have those rules dublin prices wouldnt have stopped increasing 2/3 years ago and would probably be 15% higher, thats hardly a good outcome?
GreeBo wrote: » 1 associate is enough for some countries to consider it a permanent establishment. If you don't believe me go ask your CFO.
schmittel wrote: » Sure if you just removed the rules without any other changes prices would be higher, whether that is 15% or whatever is anybody's guess. What I mean is all interference should be scrapped including the lending limits. The lending rules are limiting prices to the upside, other factors are limiting them to the downside. Remove all the meddling and let the market set the price.
tigger123 wrote: » Wasn't the market setting the price in the period leading up to 2007? Removing the 3.5 multiplier would be complete madness. People would be forced to get up to their neck in unsustainable date due to the lack of housing supply.
fliball123 wrote: » Maybe but this line of posts is in relation to another poster who suggests that if all property market manipulation was taken out of the equation then prices would fall, which I don't think it would I believe people would over stretch themselves again like what happened leading up to the crash of 08 and property would be higher today without those lending rules
Reversal wrote: » So Dublin down 4% since October 2018 now, down 0.3% in a month. So what gives with the unverified PPR data that keeps getting posted here by a certain cohort that somehow always shows things are on the up. Or the stories of everything going over asking?
Pelezico wrote: » Property in Dublin is falling. And the numbers of transactions are down. All this nonsense about ever increasing prices and bidding wars has now been completely debunked.
Cyrus wrote: » or.... prices in Dublin are down by less than a percent, all of this nonsense about large price decreases has now been debunked or maybe given the price changes are so small nothing has been debunked or proven except that ACHIEVED SELLING PRICES are relatively flat.
Pelezico wrote: » Except they are falling. Wait until supply increases in the autumn selling season. Now that should be fun.
Pelezico wrote: » All this nonsense about ever increasing prices and bidding wars has now been completely debunked.
Marius34 wrote: » Residential property prices rise by 0.1% in the year to June In Dublin, residential property prices saw a decline of 0.7% in the year to June. Residential property prices in Ireland excluding Dublin were 0.9% higher in the year to June. If this doesn't tell about price stability, nothing will tell... Even for CSO i believe it is well expected up to +/-1% margin of error, as it is impossible to get precise calculation on property price.
fliball123 wrote: » No point talking to him/her they wouldn't listen/look at the PPR data and insisted CSO was right even do it was a few months out of date, now he is spinning the CSO data stating prices have dropped and anyone looking can see that prices have stayed flat. Prices are up .3 since last month and back up .1 since March I had stated that May there was a blip as could be seen in the PPR data and now CSO has backed up what I am saying .
Pelezico wrote: » You have been spinning yourself.
fliball123 wrote: » Where have I been spinning, you were caught out for blatently lying by bought sets of data. Look anyone looking on here can check for themselves I don't need to entertain you. I told you before that when you spin that prices are falling I would just put up the PPR data to prove you wrong, now I can put up the PPR and the CSO data .. Good man you just keep waiting for that Autumn for all the properties to come to the market that are going to drop I hope your not left waiting
Pelezico wrote: » Properties on market increase in Autumn.
Pelezico wrote: » Properties on market increase in Autumn. You have spent the last few months telling us that numbers are falling. Nobody had the heart to tell you they always fall in Summer.
fliball123 wrote: » I am not disagreeing with you I think there will be more property available for the Autumn , I am simply pointing out 2 things 1: that demand will be up again due to people coming off covid subsidy and 2: that the number of properties available has fallen and unlike yourself I didn't start making up stuff like property prices have dropped when they have not
schmittel wrote: » I suspect you're right that the demand for credit will increase once covid subsidy ends. Given the circumstances, I don't think the supply of credit will be up to meet the demand.
fliball123 wrote: » Yeah you could be onto something it all depends on the banks approach, what I do see are new players coming in hopefully increasing competition and driving down interest rates and I see that some lenders have started upping their game for example I have heard KBC are going to start giving cash back for every new mortgage. But you may well be right but if people are within the 3.5 wage limit and 20/80 or (10/90 for FTB) limits there will be an uproar if they don't lend.