nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Ireland Team Talk XI: Team of nervoUS MOD warning Post 1

[Deleted User]

Continued from here
https://touch.boards.ie/thread/2057953711/251
All Ireland Senior XV related talk here.

MOD: Bear in mind this thread is starting during the World Cup window and the zero tolerance policy is in force. Trolling will be rewarded with an instant ban. For the duration of the tournament any mention of Zebo in this thread will not be permitted, it is just dragging current Ireland squad talk off topic.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

errlloyd

I just remember Conway scoring that try against South Africa, and me not understanding why they'd ground it over their own line like that.

Podge_irl

errlloyd wrote: »

Does the alternate not have the same problem as the last alternate? IE being almost the same colour as South Africa, the only nation we wear our alternate against?

Alas, the days of only wearing the alternate when playing SA in Dublin are well and truly gone anyway. They will wear it for some game no matter what.

errlloyd

Does the alternate not have the same problem as the last alternate? IE being almost the same colour as South Africa, the only nation we wear our alternate against?

Clegg

When I say consider a new captain I meant just give it to James Ryan now.

Paul Smeenus

Clegg wrote: »

Would it be time to consider selecting a new captain? Sexton has a contract until 2021 so it makes sense to start the transition.

< rubs hands together >

Clegg

Would it be time to consider selecting a new captain? Sexton has a contract until 2021 so it makes sense to start the transition.

[Deleted User]

Squidgy Black wrote: »

I think the lighting they chose for the photos isn't doing it any favours.

Same happened last year the Jersey looked almost luminous because of the lighting was grand in person

Squidgy Black

I think the lighting they chose for the photos isn't doing it any favours.

theboss80

Problem for me being of a bigger frame the sizing is all over the shop. Hadn't bought Canterbury in a few years and bout some stuff with a voucher back at the RWC time and where a 3xl is perfectly fine for me in an Adidas Munster jersey the 4xl was skin tight in a Canterbury Ireland one and is therefore lying on a hanger.

DGRulz

Not massively opposed to it but think it might have been better if it was entirely camo, at least at the front. The front on shot on Elvery's website kinda looks like it's a camo apron.

Podge_irl

I kinda like it

arsebiscuits1

Looks a lot like the Sevens camo style jersey they have.

I like it.

The alternate.... not so much, bit like a training jersey. But sure we will only wear it once

Rigor Mortis

Jesus, that is a low.

Eod100

Burkie1203 wrote: »

I see we are in the Army now

https://twitter.com/SportsJOEdotie/status/1296311247055585280?s=19

I know you can't do much to change a solid green jersey but don't think the camo look is great at all

Burkie1203

I see we are in the Army now

https://twitter.com/SportsJOEdotie/status/1296311247055585280?s=19

Paul Smeenus

Yeah, agreed. Curtis as well. He already got pulled from one season for having too many concussions.

Clegg

Paul Smeenus wrote: »

So's Beirne, and maybe Dooley? In fairness, those injury lists mid-season wouldn't look out of place. I just thought each province might start back with something closer to the full complement of players.

It sort of makes sense that injuries are occuring. Murray Kinsella made the point a few weeks ago that players were training diligently, but without the supervision of S&C coaches. They were given schedules, but with no way to oversee what they're doing injuries are more likely to occur. And rugby is a very physical game anyway. Injuries occur in training all the time. Couple that with patchy S&C work during lockdown and you have trouble.

It's the likes of Abdaladze, Addison and Carbery that worry me more. These are guys with chronic injury problems that haven't been caused by lack of oversight.

Paul Smeenus

I dunno. That's the case with Henderson, and Addison had surgery earlier in the year. Maybe Abdaladze? But names are being added with every update.

awec

I assume a few of these guys are out because they couldn’t get required treatment during the summer, rather than picking up recent injuries.

thomond2006

Beirne just returned to training.

Paul Smeenus

So's Beirne, and maybe Dooley? In fairness, those injury lists mid-season wouldn't look out of place. I just thought each province might start back with something closer to the full complement of players.

Clegg

I do t know what the situation is with others, but in James Ryan's case it appears that he's well on the way to recovery. Back in training at least.

Paul Smeenus

The all-provincial list of injuries getting a bit long. So much for coming back refreshed.

Ulster:
Henderson
Addison
Curtis
Warwick
Baloucoune
Reidy

Leinster:
James Ryan
Adam Byrne
Peter Dooley
Vakh Abdaladze
Fergus McFadden
Conor O’Brien

Munster:
Joey Carbery
Mike Haley
Dan Goggin
Roman Salanoa
Tadhg Bierne

Connacht:
Quin Roux
Oisín Dowling
Seán O'Brien
Peter Robb
Stephen Fitzgerald

I’m sure I’ve missed some.

CMcsporty

aloooof wrote: »

I doubt we'll ever have a better back-row quartet than Ferris, Wally, Heaslip and SOB.

Still find it mad that they are all practically finished.
I’m getting old!

CMcsporty

Richie_Rich89 wrote: »

Schmidt lost both his World Cup quarter finals more heavily than Kidney lost his.

I don't think the Ferris, SOB, Heaslip backrow ever really clicked. Wallace was a huge loss. He was a better carrier against set defences than O'Brien was. The backrow that started the big win against England in that year's 6N was 6. O'Brien, 7. Wallace, 8. Heaslip.

With Wallace absent, it might have been better to start an out-and-out openside like Jennings in the qf against Wales. He completely changed the game coming on for the second half against Northampton in the Euro Final earlier that year.

Was never a big fan of Jennings at test level.
I think Ireland’s biggest problem was that they were brainless. Give it to SOB and take it from there.
Chop tackle. Try again. Chop tackle. Give it to Ferris. Chop. Pass to ROG. Smash.

aloooof

Richie_Rich89 wrote: »

Schmidt lost both his World Cup quarter finals more heavily than Kidney lost his.

I don't think the Ferris, SOB, Heaslip backrow ever really clicked. Wallace was a huge loss. He was a better carrier against set defences than O'Brien was. The backrow that started the big win against England in that year's 6N was 6. O'Brien, 7. Wallace, 8. Heaslip.

With Wallace absent, it might have been better to start an out-and-out openside like Jennings in the qf against Wales. He completely changed the game coming on for the second half against Northampton in the Euro Final earlier that year.

I doubt we'll ever have a better back-row quartet than Ferris, Wally, Heaslip and SOB.

Richie_Rich89

ionadnapokot wrote: »

Just havng a little day dream here....indulge me!
2011 RWC QF Ireland 22 v 10 Wales
Joe Schmidt Ireland head coach
Kearney; Bowe, BOD, Dorce, Trimble; Murray, Sexton: Best, Ross; DOC, POC (c); Ferris, SOB, Heaslip
Rep:
Cronin, Court, Ryan, Wallace, Reddan, ROG, Earls (wing only)

SF Ireland 9 v 8 France
Final Ireland 8 v 7 NZ Ref: His Holiness

Schmidt lost both his World Cup quarter finals more heavily than Kidney lost his.

I don't think the Ferris, SOB, Heaslip backrow ever really clicked. Wallace was a huge loss. He was a better carrier against set defences than O'Brien was. The backrow that started the big win against England in that year's 6N was 6. O'Brien, 7. Wallace, 8. Heaslip.

With Wallace absent, it might have been better to start an out-and-out openside like Jennings in the qf against Wales. He completely changed the game coming on for the second half against Northampton in the Euro Final earlier that year.

Buer

ionadnapokot wrote: »

As Blood & Mud beautifully put it once -
"Oh look, Haskell completely ****ed something up that required something other than tackling or talking ****e. What a ****ing surprise."

Incomparable to Curry or Underhill

Eloquent and well supported points.

Curry and Underhill are superior players and will have lengthy and successful careers. But you're somewhat doing the two lads a disservice by being so dimissive of them. That is of course you actually meant England having come full circle literally which would mean they're now back at the level they were with Haskell and Robshaw.

England were the dominant side in world rugby in 2016 and Haskell was a key player for them, winning player of the series in the Australia whitewash and starting every 6N game. It was only the second occasion in history when a side won every game in a calendar year.

Guys like Robshaw and Haskell will never be looked upon as greats (nor should they be) but they also get a very raw deal in how they're perceived in people's memories. People struggle to separate a person from their performances.

AbusesToilets

Buer wrote: »

I'd say that the English pack overall is far more aggressive than ours. Vunipola wasn't playing this year against us and they still comfortably dominated us in terms of physicality.

There's probably not a huge amount of difference in strength but they're more dynamic and utilise their power and size far more. Curry and Underhill aren't massive guys but they show a level of physicality that we rarely see from our flankers. They dominate top tier opposition with their combination of timing and dynamism. We rarely see an Irish back rower make the gain line hits and carries that these guys do.

They also have guys like Lawes who is 115kg and can slot into the back row without missing a beat bringing extreme mobility and the same levels of aggression.

Ferris is probably as close as we get to that genetic freak scenario but even he didn't have a huge number of momentum shifting moments at test level where he absolutely emptied an opposition player in possession or obliterated a ruck the way we've seen England do to us over the past 18 months.

It's the passivness that's killer, letting England and NZ smash us back, carry after carry. We know we've done best when the team is aggressive in the tackle, let in the biggest games it's been soak, soak, soak. Maddening

ionadnapóca

As Blood & Mud beautifully put it once -
"Oh look, Haskell completely ****ed something up that required something other than tackling or talking ****e. What a ****ing surprise."

Incomparable to Curry or Underhill