Deleted User wrote: » Nope. Because I can throw rejoinders of Migrants who I knew from their own original countries who have since moved to Ireland and found it incredibly difficult to integrate, even though they wished to do so. Just as I know migrants (I teach English to migrants as a volunteer) who do not try even remotely to integrate. You really don't have to guess. I explained earlier about integration.... you've just chosen to put your own interpretation on what integration consists of (which I'd simply consider projections of culture), and keep avoiding actually addressing my post about integration. You keep sidestepping it. Which fine in itself. I've gotten used to this kind of posting style on this thread.
Tell me how wrote: » I worked with a Muslim from Kenya who lives in the west of Ireland with his wife and children and they had to issue with interacting with colleagues in the work environment, or having themselves and their family engage with members of the Irish community in which they lived and their son played GAA. Is that single piece of anecdotal specific enough for you?
Or how about my hosing estate which had mixture of Irish, English, Filipino, Polish, French, Chinese and Indian people living in it, and the kids from these families played amongst each others and their parents interacted in a pretty such consistent manner to how everyone else did. Or how about the wards and theatres of every hospital in the country where people of all nationalities and backgrounds, and religions work? Let me guess, you are not talking about 'these' types of integration.
Stateofyou wrote: » So no Irish person packs the Irish pubs abroad, brings their teas and rashers on holidays and has their families send them tayto crisps etc when living abroad? Clothes, music, religion and food are a part of people's cultural identity and that is fine. Sports I would argue, is a big part of Irish culture- just look at the predominance of GAA pitches around the country. And if anyone has a religion that is part of their belief system, so be it. Ours seems to be a leftover relic that doesn't die mostly because some want a chance to show off at every communion. Communions are about the outfit and hair and accessories (especially girls + their mothers) and the party. Please. They don't see the inside of a church other than that and confirmation, weddings, funerals and remembrance mass. Don't get me started on the harm the Catholic Church have caused. What's your problem with what people do.
Deleted User wrote: » You highlighted the part where I said I never hear of specifics... and you didn't give me specifics about integration. Instead, you referred to aspects of culture.. which TBF migrants aren't generally involving themselves in. Most migrants retain their own sense of fashion, in many cases, showing their own cultural norms (Muslims, and Africans), or adopting Americam hip-hop or African American styles. The same can be said for food as they're more likely to eat at home rather that outside due, in part, to the overall high costs of eating outside the home. Music is typically of a more international angle anyway, with a large part being British or American. As for sports, very few involve themselves in community sports that have Irish players, instead, playing sports with those of their own culture or religion. As for the rest of your post, I've read it three times and each time I'm not really sure why you're writing it... in connection or in response to my post (or the quoted piece). Perhaps address what I said about integration?
Tell me how wrote: » I posted before about examples of cuisine, fashion, music, art, sports, etc and how that moved and was adopted and tweaked and integrated. I mentioned how in a global economy having more of an awareness of different markets and cultural norms within the would be beneficial. I mentioned how more movement gave the opportunity for sharing of tacit knowledge. But, I was met with, not that type of multiculturalism. It seems some want to see specific examples of extremists from different cultures living across the street for each other and practising their own strands of divisive religion in places of worship nearby and for there to be no unrest in this environment for it to be considered successful. it would be like saying unless there are no deaths or injuries from car accidents, then automotive transport is a failure. It is to narrow a target for success. In terms of more widespread integration versus feeling of community at an individual level. They are widely different concepts, as you know.
Deleted User wrote: » Actually, you'll find that with the advent of technology, and social media, people are far more distant from each other than ever before. At least, based on the research done in the US and other countries, people feel more lonely and isolated than at any other time in history. While people will have huge friends lists online, real meaningful connections with others is declining... especially where it involves people outside of their intimate social circle. Getting an introduction and being allowed within that circle is rather difficult.. with other relationships being very superficial. And so with integration, once again, you'll find that there is very little actual integration occurring because the metrics by which we used to judge cultures have changed. By removing the fundamental structures of culture (religion, insular communities with their own individual cultures, etc) we are removing the distinctiveness of particular cultures, which means that it's harder to show how people can integrate. While in the past, we could have points to various aspects of cultural behavior (Church attendance, the pub culture, etc) as ways for people to mix, those behaviors have been marginalised, leaving work as the primary way for integration to occur. However, since a large portion of migrants lack the educational or skills to compete equally with Irish people, migrants won't be integrating with Irish people, but rather with other migrants, who are also taking those jobs which their lack of qualifications place them in. In any case, again if you look at the research on migrants, they tend to associate with others of their own culture or religion, and there is very little interaction with others except for the most superficial of contacts.I hear a lot about how integration will occur, but there's never any specifics. Little recognition of how our cultures have changed over the last few decades, and again, little recognition that integration has been a failure for decades... People look at schools, and see that a few young people will have friends from other races, but while friendships occur, there is little actual integration of migrants into Irish culture, especially, when consideration is given to the customs or cultural behaviors taught in the home, and later, what is taken with them once they grow up enough to leave the home.
Tell me how wrote: » The world today with the ease of movement, travel, co-recognized education and training is moving forward with more integration and is better for it.
Wibbs wrote: » Thank you for illustrating how anorexic your argument is. Short enough for you? Not nearly to the same degree, much of the movement of people was on the back of conquest and they came to be accepted - where that happened and it doesn't always - they were almost exclusively of the same "race" as the locals. And again yup, so why import the risk of more and newer seemingly more intractable social problems? After all the benefits seem remarkably undefinable and scant according to those who believe in this politic and social experiment.The evidence of what exactly? You're all too quick to state "of course it works" but again remarkably lacking in examples and always ignore the obvious and quite the long and provable list of where it doesn't, not least for the migrant populations. And again in your own time please point out any western nation where the darker of skin don't on average gather around the bottom of the socioeconomic scale. Show me a multicultural western nation where there aren't societal lines drawn along racial and ethnic lines. Ask Black folks in Paris, Turks in Germany, Muslims in the UK and see how included they feel in the lands they find themselves in. Such groups don't go on protests for the craic. They're living this experiment. Show me a multicultural western nation that doesn't show ghettoisation along racial and ethnic lines. As I've pointed out we're only in this game two decades and it's already started here, along with the self interest mouthpieces and NGO's making hay over how racist Irish society is and that Irish society should accommodate them through "their cultural lens". What this thread does illustrate is how scarily empty the list of positives are, yet how quick some people are in buying into them.
The Unbearables wrote: » You think multiculturalism has worked in London or New York. I've lived in both cities at various times of my life and I can tell you it doesnt
Thelonious Monk wrote: » Have you heard of London or New York or Toronto? You'll go on about black knife crime in London but i lived there for years and for the most part it's an amazing friendly melting pot of cultures with some issues alright but every city has issues monocultural or not. I'm not pro open borders or anything but to say multiculturalism doesn't work is wrong from my experience.
Tell me how wrote: » No need to look at London, NY, or Toronto, pretty much every society has been influenced by the movement of people and the sharing of knowledge and skills and materials and practices. Cries of 'yeah but they were white or the same colour' ignores that the same arguments as are being used now were used against those people who initially moved but they eventually integrated and were accepted.
Like it was also conveniently ignored that Ireland had quite a reputation for knife crime or gangs long before it was possible to put it down to the influx of migrants.
This thread was all about culture integration could never work, in-spite of all the evidence,
but today seems to be focused on the asylum process and how that is a bad thing (probably because of the 2 high profile events in the media recently showing that the examples of undesirable culture being practised were by Irish people).
Stateofyou wrote: » Sorry TLDR :pac:
Wibbs wrote: » Annnnnnd here we go again. The same worn out threadbare "argument" that keeps being peddled as if Irish emigration is a mirror of the current form. Only it isn't and for a few reasons and yet again I'll explain why because this silly argument seems to have legs: 1) In the vast majority of cases Irish immigrants were going to ex colonies of Europe founded upon and utterly reliant upon immigration. When those nations reached a population level that didn't require immigration in such numbers their criteria became significantly more limited and numbers let through dropped off a cliff. Getting into America in the 1890's was mostly a case of having the fare to get there, getting into American today? Well have a go and see. 2) The Irish and other immigrant groups going to such places had almost no social safety net, no social welfare, no social housing. It was sink, swim or charity. And a fair amount of exploitation. 3) European nations today are very different societies that have quite different needs. Cheap low education labour is a contracting market. We are not colonies that required masses of non native people. Ireland in particular has the highest birth rate in the EU so doesn't fit into that usual oh "we need more babies" stuff, though that is still peddled here. Well it's the same multicultural script everywhere, no sense in changing it. As an aside multiculturalism as a politic as well as being steeped in the oppressed/oppressor narrative, is also a politic of those ex European New World colonies because they had to deal with it by virtue of their very design. Or it's a politic of European nations who were colonisers where many of the colonised have come home to roost. Ireland doesn't fit into either category and shouldn't have to import the decades of ongoing daftness like them. We've only had a taste of it for 20 years and we're experiencing it already. Why do we have to accept this? Why is this such an obvious given? And while you're struggling to come up with an answer that doesn't involve going straight for the copy of charity posters, maybe dig deeper and yet again please outline these positives you are so sure of. Exotic food, vague appeals to empathy and cheap labour have been covered by the way. I'd have no issue with that number of actual asylum seekers, or paying taxes to give them a leg up. A far faster judgement process. You get in, or you don't and if you don't, then get the hell out. Six months tops. Streamline it right down as Australia has. Oh brilliant, more bloody NGO's sucking at the taxpayers teat. No thank you. Faith groups. :rolleyes: We already have more NGO's with a shed load of overlap already sucking at that teat. If the general public knew how many I'd bet the majority would be as irritated by the sheer waste and funding of muppets as I am. Well I think you'd find if the current asylum seekers, the majority of whom are rejected as chancers from the usual sources that even the bold Leo referenced, had to face the same setup as the Irish and other immigrants to the New World, you'd magically discover the number of them showing up would dwindle to an absolute trickle and actual asylum seekers. Indeed it would be one helluva good filter to weed out said chancers.
The Unbearables wrote: » This all comes down to one question. Has multiculturalism worked in any society in the history of our planet? We all know the answer but yet we refuse to change direction in fear of being called racist.
Dude89 wrote: » Some on here are saying the numbers claiming Asylum are relatively low, are missing out on one part of the process, once granted they can apply for FAMILY REUNIFICATION, I've read up to 20 family members can come here under reunification. who supports the additional family members who arrive?
Patrick2010 wrote: » The usual reply, Irish people immigated so we should take in anyone who wants to come here. Irish people who went to America,England,Australia wherever went to work in countries that needed workers, they didn’t arrive expecting free houses and to have all their needs looked after.
The Unbearables wrote: » And we had the same moral and cultural values that Americans believe in. We wanted to integrate not separate.
The Unbearables wrote: » This all comes down to one question. Has multiculturalism worked in any society in the history of our planet?
Stateofyou wrote: » It's lucky you don't need to now seek asylum, isn't it. It's lucky you aren't living in the times in which Irish people immigrated out all over out of necessity. Better hope in future you never find yourself on the wrong side of economic, wartime or climate disaster looking for safety and security somewhere else. Because you obviously don't think people in that situation are worthy, including yourself and your loved ones. In fact all those Irish people should have just stayed put and suffered. Right?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w9.vanillicon.com/v2/9c6ef39403f5dc93bd4b9e77a11c1821.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w6.vanillicon.com/v2/6b0748b4741870baaad828fe92174b3c.svg)
