dotsman wrote: » In the absence of safe, well run pubs being allowed to open by the government, I wouldn't punish any pub for opening in whatever manner. What we see in this clip, and all the house-parties and field sessions are exactly what an intelligent person would expect to happen in this era of prohibition. Throughout the summer, when a young/fun person has gone out to socialise and have even a bit of fun, they are hoping to find a venue that will break the rules. Why? Because the rules are stupid and unworkable (€9 food and 105 minutes are exactly the kind of rules that a bureaucrat that has never had fun would dream up of). Instead, all pubs should be open, with the government working with them to ensure low-risk environments (seating-only, decent distance between each table, tables/chairs out on the streets, strict table-service, strict hygiene of bar staff etc). Allow people to have fun in a safe way, and they won't need to pursue risky activities that we see in the clip.P.S. threads like this highlight how many old/dull people there are on boards
Jizique wrote: » It wasn’t at night and it was a private “brunch party”; now, it probably should be closed due to Jay Bourke’s Involvement alone, but not sure you can blame the cops for this one
dotsman wrote: » P.S. threads like this highlight how many old/dull people there are on boards
Buford T. Justice XIX wrote: » Or perhaps just close the non compliant pubs for 2 weeks for the first breach, 4 weeks for the next and I doubt there will be many needing a third closure. The worst of the pubs will have loads of social media videos showing how great the 'craic' is so no need to even enter the pubs, just get the Gardai to call in with a closure notice the following morning.
Man with broke phone wrote: » This means nothing to me Oh Vienna.
hynesie08 wrote: » It's a Saturday afternoon and if I remember the layout of that bar properly, they're out of view of the street. It's also a private function so who's going to call them? Still a shower of ***** though....
banie01 wrote: » Safe, safe and sensible people on boards, many of whom have done all the stupid risky things and are offering advice from positions of experience. Albeit not of a pandemic, but of outliving some folk! I've lived longer than Jesus FFS! People should totally do as I order :P
PhilOssophy wrote: » I saw a publican in our local paper last week saying about they way his pub was a responsibly ran pub, etc, etc. At Christmas, there was no soap, the toilets were so bad I went to the chipper up the street for a piss. No soap, a broken hand towel, and an overflowing urinal. And you think he should be open in a pandemic?
Sleeper12 wrote: » The simplist solution would have not to allow the sale of alcohol in bars, cafes, restaurants etc until phase 4.
L1011 wrote: » It'll have an exceptionally hard time keeping its licence when it comes up for renewal in September (all licences run October->September) anyway. Although the last major licence-stripping was 20 years ago
Wanderer2010 wrote: » This. This is why pubs in Ireland arent frightened about being caught breaking regulations. There is zero punishment from the authorities and therefore no incentive to stick to the rules. HSE and HIQA are toothless and havent got the guts to actually stand by their own principals. This pub wont be stripped of its license anymore than any of the meat factories will be shut down. All talk no action.
Richard Hillman wrote: » People going up to the bar, one by one taking drinks. Bar man had a Mask on. There were some people dancing in the background, most likely in the groups that they were with already. What's the problem?
Bobtheman wrote: » Off licenses open while practically everything else closed.
Signore Fancy Pants wrote: » Man thats cringy as fcuk. Im old as fcuk though.
sabat wrote: » What the f*ck happened to you people? Grassing people up to the fun police as we descend into a joyless dystopia.
dotsman wrote: » Of course he should be allowed open. And proactively given direct advise/audit prior to opening to help him do things the right way (i.e. enable customer to enjoy themselves safely and still make a profit). While open, he should be regularly checked, and if in serious breach, or repeated minor breaches - then, absolutely, shut him down.
dotsman wrote: » Our job is to find ways to live with it, not simply shut everything down and re-emerge from our bunkers in several year's time.
PhilOssophy wrote: » So what is the standard of soap and towels required?
PhilOssophy wrote: » If a cleaning schedule was requested, he would go in every hr and write on the door that the toilet was checked. Not cleaned, but checked.
PhilOssophy wrote: » Yep, that is working well for Uncle Sam isn't it!
Leanna Ugly Jig wrote: » Why’s the poll private?