smurfjed wrote: » This is interesting from Eurocontrolhttp://https://twitter.com/eurocontroldg/status/1292125590884175875?s=21https://twitter.com/eurocontroldg/status/1292125590884175875?s=21
Chris_5339762 wrote: » Yes, flights are running, but the load factors are absolutely pathetic. Even if I was vaccinated and could travel tomorrow, I probably still wouldn't due to governments changing quarantine restrictions almost daily.
Blut2 wrote: » Ryanair flew 40% of its planned July schedule with a load factor of 72%. Its planning to fly 60%+ of normal schedule in August apparently. Wizz operated 74% of its planned capacity in July and achieved a load factor of 61%. Not good compared to normal times obviously, but thats still a hell of a lot of seats being sold. And its going up rapidly every week. The budget carriers seem to recovering a lot faster than others. Presumably because they get a lot more last minute travel, a lot more short haul travel, and are a lot less reliant on business travel.
Blut2 wrote: » Ryanair flew 40% of its planned July schedule with a load factor of 72%. Its planning to fly 60%+ of normal schedule in August apparently. Wizz operated 74% of its planned capacity in July and achieved a load factor of 61%.
Noxegon wrote: » Load factor is one thing, yield is another –– when you can buy tickets for the next day's flight for €19.99 it speaks volumes.
IngazZagni wrote: » Many of these having bought €20 fares which barely cover the taxes applicable anyway....
HTCOne wrote: » This got me wondering, if the passenger who booked their flight before COVID kicked off doesn’t show up for a flight that the airline still operates because they don’t want to quarantine etc, does the airline still pay the taxes and airport fees for that passenger?
goingnowhere wrote: » They pocket the cash, you pay only for passengers who show
goingnowhere wrote: » Jet fuel is running at half the price it was in January and thats a huge chunk of the operating cost. EI is flying around with 40-70 per flight, but they carry freight on most routes. All things considered if you can run at 50% load and 50 euro a head you are not in a bad place currrently
Gaoth Laidir wrote: » Italy now has mandatory testing on all passengers entering Italy from Spain, Greece, Malta and Croatia. The increase in cases recently is mostly due to African migrant ships and returning holidaymakers from those four countries. From tomorrow they'll be starting rapid testing at Rome Fiumicino, with a 15-minute turnaround time. The test is based on a saliva sample, so I'm not sure exactly how its reliability compares to the current test.
Tenzor07 wrote: » Airlines heage fuel costs at the start of the year, so if they get that wrong they'll still pay high prices for fuel that year...
goingnowhere wrote: » Hedges work two ways, you can hedge to pay at a set price (i.e committed) and hedge an option to purchase (no obligation to purchase)
marno21 wrote: » The struggle for air capacity in the London area over the past few years will lead to a glut of capacity now with the massive reduction in air traffic. VS have moved all operations ex LGW to LHR and BA are cutting back at LGW too. LGW will then have excess capacity which might see some flights which were at STN/LTN move to LGW. Southend is in serious trouble as it was primarily as an overflow airport for low cost carriers from LGW/STN/LTN.
Blut2 wrote: » London is going to be particularly fascinating to watch over the next 12 months. In a year's time I really wonder what state STN/LTN/SEN will be in. I'd be shocked if they all survived in anything resembling their current form, with LCY/LHR/LGW likely to hoover up the vast majority of what remains of the much reduced demand over winter.