2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Dr. Siegel tells Tucker Carlson there is 'no science' behind Biden's mask mandate
Siegel called it 'the politics of fear'

Media not buying it after all, I'm sure CNN will retort later to say everyone is going to die if they don't listen to Professor Biden.

this i don't get (along with a lot more!). biden's proposed policy is the exact same as trumps - it will be the individual states that will decide.

duploelabs

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Arnold Schwarzenegger can't run for president and he has European parents.

He wasn't born in the United States either, Harris was

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

my bad so. just picked up on this part:

claiming that neither her father or mother was a naturalised US citizen at the time of her birth in 1964.

here are the criteria (per wikipedia):

Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution sets three qualifications for holding the presidency. To serve as president, one must:

be a natural-born U.S. citizen of the United States;
be at least 35 years old;
be a resident in the United States for at least 14 years.[1]
A person who meets the above qualifications would, however, still be disqualified from holding the office of president under any of the following conditions:

[cut out - things like treason, irrelevant here though]

there is a question about a natural-born U.S. citizen of the United States, as its not defined in the constitution which is what yer man was angling at i presume:
The U.S. Constitution uses but does not define the phrase "natural born Citizen".
the Supreme Court has never directly addressed the question of a specific presidential or vice-presidential candidate's eligibility as a natural-born citizen.

buts that soooo far reaching, its almost embarrassing. just get on with the various campaigns. attack her policies if you want, this is just desperate!

Exactly , If her name was Patricia O'Malley and her parents Paudie and Majella had emigrated to California from Ballyjamesduff, County Cavan in 1964 not a single person would have raised this question.

It's the fundamental racism of the GOP - the only "real" Americans are WASP's (with the WHITE bit being the most critical) , everyone else is subject to suspicion.

It's the same line of thinking that has Trump telling "the Squad" to go back to where they came from despite the fact that 3 out of 4 were born in the US and in the case of Ayanna Pressley her family have been in the US longer than Trumps.

Kidchameleon

namloc1980 wrote: »

I like the way you inserted ... instead of quoting him further. Nice tactic. "I just heard it today that she doesn't meet the requirements

and by the way the lawyer that wrote that piece is a very highly qualified, very talented lawyer." Immediately he's trying to lend credence to the issue and put it out

there.

"But that's a very serious, you're saying that, they're saying that she doesn't qualify because she wasn't born in this country." He was corrected on this point and

then he quickly moved on. Why would he say such a blatant lie other than to stoke the flames of this conspiracy theory. He just stood there and bold faced lied that

she wasn't born in the country.

Oh really? You like the way I inserted the ... do you? That's strange because I copied and pasted it exactly as is from, wait for it... YOUR POST!

Go ahead and have a look, post #1568 :rolleyes:

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Dr. Siegel tells Tucker Carlson there is 'no science' behind Biden's mask mandate
Siegel called it 'the politics of fear'

Media not buying it after all, I'm sure CNN will retort later to say everyone is going to die if they don't listen to Professor Biden.

It wouldn't exactly surprise anyone for Tucker and Co to be discouraging the use of masks. Meanwhile both the WHO, CDC and governments across the globe recommend the use of them. And contrary to what you were saying, it is unlikely to increase your risk of getting the virus and in all likelihood does reduce the risk of getting it.

The same Siegel is also urging schools to reopen in the US which isn't exactly the wisest atm.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_AjBoZ40iw

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

this i don't get (along with a lot more!). biden's proposed policy is the exact same as trumps - it will be the individual states that will decide.

Biden clearly called for nationwide mandatory masks.

Quin_Dub wrote: »

Exactly , If her name was Patricia O'Malley and her parents Paudie and Majella had emigrated to California from Ballyjamesduff, County Cavan in 1964 not a single person would have raised this question.

It's the fundamental racism of the GOP - the only "real" Americans are WASP's (with the WHITE bit being the most critical) , everyone else is subject to suspicion.

It's the same line of thinking that has Trump telling "the Squad" to go back to where they came from despite the fact that 3 out of 4 were born in the US and in the case of Ayanna Pressley her family have been in the US longer than Trumps.

its not racist, its politics.

surely you can draw that distinction? try to discredit an opponent, par for the course really.

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

its not racist, its politics.

surely you can draw that distinction? try to discredit an opponent, par for the course really.

I would say it's playing to the racist audience in politics so it is in fact racist. They don't to be up in arms with white candidates about their nationality. It also heavily overlaps with the conspiracy theory crowd.

Deleted User wrote: »

It wouldn't exactly surprise anyone for Tucker and Co to be discouraging the use of masks. Meanwhile both the WHO, CDC and governments across the globe recommend the use of them. And contrary to what you were saying, it is unlikely to increase your risk of getting the virus and in all likelihood does reduce the risk of getting it.

No I don't say it increaces the risk the professor said it appeared to. You've been shown there is 0 evidence of any worthwhile benefit in current government policy here.
Anyway cases are going up, stay tuned.

Kidchameleon

Hoop66 wrote: »

"I have no idea if that's right".

But I'm certainly going to mention it during a presidential press conference.

If you can defend this sort of behaviour there is something wrong with you.

He didn't "mention" it. He was asked the question by a reporter.

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Biden clearly called for nationwide mandatory masks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_AjBoZ40iw

do you have the rest of that clip, cos i'm nearly certain he caveats it by saying it will be up to the states to decide themselves.

Deleted User wrote: »

I would say it's playing to the racist audience in politics so it is in fact racist. They don't to be up in arms with white candidates about their nationality. It also heavily overlaps with the conspiracy theory crowd.

how many racists do you think are in america?

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

its not racist, its politics.

surely you can draw that distinction? try to discredit an opponent, par for the course really.

So why wasn't it used to question Ted Cruz eligibility then - His father is Cuban and Ted was born in Canada??

Or John McCain - He was born in Panama?

Why is it only the Black people that get asked this question?

Why did Trump tell women of colour "to go back to where they came from" when they are American?

There's a theme here...And it isn't "politics"

Timberrrrrrrr

[Deleted User] wrote: »

I would say it's playing to the racist audience in politics so it is in fact racist. They don't to be up in arms with white candidates about their nationality. It also heavily overlaps with the conspiracy theory crowd.

Not a peep out of them that Trumps wife is an immigrant.

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

do you have the rest of that clip, cos i'm nearly certain he caveats it by saying it will be up to the states to decide themselves.

That's not what he said, he called for mandatory outside masks nationally and then asked all states to do it.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/13/us/politics/wear-masks-mandate-biden.html

Outside Masks, they want them here as well, there is no science to support that kind of a blanket policy. It's politics and it's wrong for people to blindly accept such BS without question.

drunkmonkey wrote: »

No I don't say it increaces the risk the professor said it appeared to. You've been shown there is 0 evidence of any worthwhile benefit in current government policy here.
Anyway cases are going up, stay tuned.

Thing is, we do have evidence in terms of research but you've chosen to reject it. We have enough to make a conclusion that it's worth wearing them because it has significant potential to reduce the spread. Masks amount to an inconvenience. I'd also tend to trust the words of virologists and immunologists more than doctors who are fox news pundits.

Quin_Dub wrote: »

So why wasn't it used to question Ted Cruz eligibility then - His father is Cuban and Ted was born in Canada??

Or John McCain - He was born in Panama?

Why is it only the Black people that get asked this question?

Why did Trump tell women of colour "to go back to where they came from" when they are American?

There's a theme here...And it isn't "politics"

i suppose you can make an argument for cruz in the 2016 primaries alright, if trump didn't do the same to him:

Cruz's eligibility was questioned by some of his primary opponents, including Donald Trump

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-cruz-clash-over-eligibility-new-york-values-at-gop-debate

Deleted User wrote: »

Thing is, we do have evidence in terms of research but you've chosen to reject it. We have enough to make a conclusion that it's worth wearing them because it has significant potential to reduce the spread. Masks amount to an inconvenience. I'd also tend to trust the words of virologists and immunologists more than doctors who are fox news pundits.

So you think Biden is right to ask for masks outdoors? You back his science references?
Your the one not prepared to accept the science does not back up current government policy it was a knee jerk reaction to the media by politicans now we have the same nonsense from Biden and you'll support it, unbelievable.

drunkmonkey wrote: »

So you think Biden is right to ask for masks outdoors? You back his science references?
Your the one not prepared to accept the science does not back up current government policy it was a knee jerk reaction to the media by politicans now we have the same nonsense from Biden and you'll support it, unbelievable.

I would say given the infection rates that it wouldn't be a bad idea for them to be made mandatory outdoors in densely populated areas. Unbelievable, I know.

Fauci said similar in relation to protests so seems applicable to any cities. I'd trust his science credentials more than yours.

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

i suppose you can make an argument for cruz in the 2016 primaries alright, if trump didn't do the same to him:

Cruz's eligibility was questioned by some of his primary opponents, including Donald Trump

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-cruz-clash-over-eligibility-new-york-values-at-gop-debate

Did Trump send Private Investigators to Cuba and Canada looking for his birth cert?

Did the whole GOP and Fox News spend 2 years banging on about it demanding that Cruz release the long-form version of his birth-cert to prove his claims?

Or did they only do that to the Black guy?

Does Trump tell Nancy Pelosi to "go back to where she came from" when she gets under his skin or does he only say that to the Black women?

Here's the thing the GOP fueled by Fox News have spent decades telling their supporters to fear "different" to fear "the other"

They have invested massively in telling their supporters that anyone that doesn't have the same beliefs as them , anyone that doesn't look,act and sound like them is a threat to their very existence.

"They are going to take your guns" , "They are going to take away religion" , "They are going to Destroy Suburbia" , "The WAR on Christmas" on and on and on and on, ad infinitum.

Call it Racism , call it Xenophobia , call it Sectarianism - Call it whatever you like.

It's the Politics of hate and fear.

To the GOP, anyone that is different is not someone to find common ground with - They are a mortal enemy.

Deleted User wrote: »

I would say given the infection rates that it wouldn't be a bad idea for them to be made mandatory outdoors in densely populated areas. Unbelievable, I know. Fauci said similar in relation to protests so seems applicable to any cities. I'd trust his science credentials more than yours.

I've seen numerous people waking the wilds of the burren in facemasks over the last week. Some people just have no comment sense.
Biden didn't say in crowded spaces, he said outdoors. People will take that at face value and believe he said outdoors.
Once you start using the Ant-Man quote your basically telling people if you don't mask up your threatening someones life, they government might get away with it here but not in Alabama. Your turning people against each other with no real world evidence, that is politically wrong.

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Dr. Siegel tells Tucker Carlson there is 'no science' behind Biden's mask mandate
Siegel called it 'the politics of fear'

Media not buying it after all, I'm sure CNN will retort later to say everyone is going to die if they don't listen to Professor Biden.

The same Dr Siegel who fawned over Person Woman Man Camera TV? Hardly an impartial observer.

He and Carlson do not represent “the media”

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/foxs-marc-siegel-gushes-over-trumps-cognitive-test-rant-he-was-extremely-sharp-on-every-second/

Kidchameleon wrote: »

He didn't "mention" it. He was asked the question by a reporter.

Let me guess was it OAN

drunkmonkey wrote: »

I've seen numerous people waking the wilds of the burren in facemasks over the last week. Some people just have no comment sense.
Biden didn't say in crowded spaces, he said outdoors. People will take that at face value and believe he said outdoors.
Once you start using the Ant-Man quote your basically telling people if you don't mask up your threatening someones life, they government might get away with it here but not in Alabama. Your turning people against each other with no real world evidence, that is politically wrong.

Just scientific evidence?

Igotadose

Overheal wrote: »

The same Dr Siegel who fawned over Person Woman Man Camera TV? Hardly an impartial observer.

From an interview on Hannity in March talking about H1N1:

"DR. MARC SIEGEL (FOX NEWS MEDICAL CONTRIBUTOR): Absolutely. And over 300,000 deaths in the United States alone when all the figures were counted. And let me tell you something, this virus should be compared to the flu. Because at worst, at worst, worst case scenario it could be the flu. And as you pointed out, the president has jumped in quickly, started the travel bans. He understands the public health issues. He's got top leaders advising him. Guess what the reason is? Try to prevent and slow the spread before it takes root here. "

---

He and Carlson do not represent “the media”

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/foxs-marc-siegel-gushes-over-trumps-cognitive-test-rant-he-was-extremely-sharp-on-every-second/

Overheal wrote: »

Let me guess was it OAN

Ding ding ding ding ding...

Give that man a prize!!!!

It was indeed the one and only Chanel Rion.

Overheal wrote: »

Let me guess was it OAN

In relation to this, they're not even the nuttiest group with a press pass. The Epoch Times have one and they're basically a new age religious cult.... I think they get a pass because they're anti-communism and pro Trump. They don't sell their newspaper, it's just an unsolicited newspaper you get through your letterbox, across the globe...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Epoch_Times

Quin_Dub wrote: »

Ding ding ding ding ding...

Give that man a prize!!!!

It was indeed the one and only Chanel Rion.

Oh man how could I have known! It definitely doesn’t have to do with coordination between OAN and the Trump Administration!