The key elements include six high speed charging hubs on motorways capable of charging eight vehicles simultaneously; 16 high speed charging hubs capable of charging four vehicles simultaneously; additional high power chargers at 34 current 50 kW locations; upgrading over 50 22 kW chargers to 50 kW, and replacing up to 264 locations with 528 charge points at the pre-existing pilot grade of 22 kW to next generation high reliability models.
Black_Knight wrote: » Looks like Ashford got an updated 22kW unit. One of the new eVolve Smart T models.
Laviski wrote: » random question. is there many people paying the membership or most just PAYG?
liamog wrote: » I'm on a membership, but only because they gave it to us for free for the first year. I'll be switching to pay&go when it's up.
slave1 wrote: » Was there last week, hardly saw an EV anywhere yet the place is littered with (mostly free) charge points, Tesla network up there great apart from weakness in Edinburgh where there is only two and they are in the airport car park
Black_Knight wrote: » Waterford 50kW is up to it's old tricks again of being down. At least they've installed that 44kW DC backup now. Think it's a battle between Waterford and Sligo for the most unreliable charger.
cruisey1987 wrote: The charger itself costs quite a bit more AFAIK, several times the cost of an AC unit. But yes even if they had to load balance the chargers and they weren't supplying the full 50kW all the time it'd still be better than AC units that aren't being fully utilised.
obi604 wrote: » its probably been discussed before............but just looking at the pricing below, seems to be no real incentive to do the membership thing. works out more unless you use the public chargers a lot, only seems to break even if you use > 120 kWh a month - Pay As You Go is charged at 26.8c per kWh - Membership is a €4.60 monthly subscription fee and a reduced charge of 23c per kWh
innrain wrote: » At 50 kW some cars depending their SOC would throttle the charging. at 25kW unless you're at 95% the charging goes full speed. You have the same number of outlets so theoretically you can charge @ 50kW all day long. .
liamog wrote: » Given the persons question was how much is the difference in the site works excluding the charging equipment, it answers it fairly well.
MJohnston wrote: » That "only" is doing an Atlas-worthy level of heavy lifting
liamog wrote: » it's only the charging equipment costs that would differ.
MJohnston wrote: » You can't simply say "up to the charger" when the price differential is at least 4x (it can be up to 10x). The retailer generally won't see any revenue from the charging, but they may have to put up some of the outlay for the hardware.
innrain wrote: » I believe that installation costs up to the charger are the same for a 2x22kW AC or 50 kW DC. For shops or private short stay car park owners 2x25kW DC makes more sense. Any car can charge full whack at 25kW DC so you always get max revenue. From AC in most cases you get one third and if you get a PHEV connected a sixth or less. Pricewise it's a factor of four but they are not that crazy. And prices are coming down fast. Just for the sake of argument if one unit delivers 25kWh for 8 hours a day 300 days a year it is generating €15k @25c kWh in revenue, with a cost of €8k (vs €2k for AC) . On the AC side you get people expencting it for free or cheaper ��. Slow charging for 47 mins does not make more sense so you will not get the same usage And when they are in use the output is a third, at best a half of it's capacity (I know Zoes and few Teslas but they ar fewer than PHEVs). So reduced usage, reduced output, reduced price. A cube of reasons not to.
innrain wrote: » I believe that installation costs up to the charger are the same for a 2x22kW AC or 50 kW DC. For shops or private short stay car park owners 2x25kW DC makes more sense. Any car can charge full whack at 25kW DC so you always get max revenue. From AC in most cases you get one third and if you get a PHEV connected a sixth or less. Pricewise it's a factor of four but they are not that crazy. And prices are coming down fast.
innrain wrote: » I believe that installation costs up to the charger are the same for a 2x22kW AC or 50 kW DC. For shops or private short stay car park owners 2x25kW DC makes more sense. Any car can charge full whack at 25kW DC so you always get max revenue. From AC in most cases you get one third and if you get a PHEV connected a sixth or less. Pricewise it's a factor of four but they are not that crazy. And prices are coming down fast. Just for the sake of argument if one unit delivers 25kWh for 8 hours a day 300 days a year it is generating €15k @25c kWh in revenue, with a cost of €8k (vs €2k for AC) . On the AC side you get people expencting it for free or cheaper 😏. Slow charging for 47 mins does not make more sense so you will not get the same usage And when they are in use the output is a third, at best a half of it's capacity (I know Zoes and few Teslas but they ar fewer than PHEVs). So reduced usage, reduced output, reduced price. A cube of reasons not to.
AndyBoBandy wrote: » Meanwhile EasyGo are emailing it’s users asking to help them identify new locations for 50kW DC chargers..... If only eCars had a similar approach...
cruisey1987 wrote: Yeah I could see it heading that way too, usually AC chargers are somewhat cheaper to install and better suited to unattended locations.
cruisey1987 wrote: I'm hoping that 50kW DC chargers will get cheaper soon with the push for higher power charging in service stations. IMHO 50kW still makes sense in a lot of places with a short visit time, like supermarkets for example.
AndyBoBandy wrote: » Just down in Kilcullen now getting a quick top up from one of the last few free ESB chargers in the country......